not to completely degenerate the conversation. but Morata keeps being the only real name that pops up as another option besides Lukaku. and if we are talking about those two, i'll take Lukaku. which is part of what i think needs to be discussed. who is better than lukaku and readily attainable, and that we don't have other concerns over how they would adapt etc?
FYI, Fox is losing their CL coverage in a year (or so?). Turner Broadcasting got english rights, so expect some of the team to follow. How Lalas remains employed is remarkable.
yeah, if those are the two options if Costa leaves, I'll take Lukaku. AND THEN SEND HIM ON LOAN TO WEST BROM
Are we talking Lukaku as part of a 2 striker lineup or as a replacement for Costa? As part of a 2 striker lineup, I soooo do not want Lukaku. The thought of Lukaku and Costa playing interchanges with each other gives me nightmares. As a replacement........eh. Lukaku isn't my first choice, and the price is ridiculous, but I suppose it could be worse. The problem remains is that I'm still very unconvinced by his ability against packed sides, which is what we tend to face against most of the league.
i also think he has limitations. but i seriously don't know who else we should go after instead. also, costa's not exactly an amazing passer or link player. he's alright. i don't really think in that regard costa has much of an edge on lukaku. costa is way more effective on the counter as well. lukaku gives quite an athletic and aerial advantage though. and he may not by himself be great against packed defenses, but that's why hazard and (insert RW here) are supposed to give us, is the chance creation. if you give lukaku chances, he'll likely get a shot on target or finish it. all this being said, i'd still like to see a lot more of Batshuayi towards the end of the season. see what we really do and don't have with him.
But can we buy like, half of Monaco's team, please? Mbappe is the real deal. Fabinho, Silva, Bakayako. What a team.
Muslera would be an adequate #2. http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation....saray-fernando-muslera-transfer-rumour-report
Courtois: “I have two years [left on my] contract, so far we have not talked about [a renewal]. Would I like to extend? Of course. I am very happy at Chelsea and if they wanted to continue with me, it would be great.” "I do not see myself at Real Madrid. I see myself at Chelsea, I feel like I'm a key to the team." “No, [I will not be at Real Madrid next year]”.
Hmm. Does that matter much anymore? Is there ANY history of players moving between clubs? Seems so silly in the modern era. I mean, we sell to Arsenal. Madrid is going to go hard after some top keeper. If United dont make CL, De Gea may be enticed. Lloris... I don't know. I think Navas has done quite well and he's not really part of Madrid's issue going forward. I can see Courtois being extended very soon.
It matters in Spain. Figo went from Madrid to Barca or vice versa but not too often do you see someone go from Atleti to Madrid or Atleti or Betis or Sevilla.
Oh I can. When things are going well, he is 100% Chelsea when it isnt things become a little more gray. If next season, something catastrophic happens I can see him jumping ship.
Does something qualify as worse than what went down last season? Think we're fine with him. It's Diego who outright said he had a foot out the door last summer
which brings us back to the big question, who replaces him if that's the case. i think we've yet to really find a viable, realistic alternative besides arguing the merits of Lukaku. most here are in agreement that the other big name that pops up (Morata), when compared to Lukaku, most take the Belgian.
this is where we get into the realistic target arguments. we could certainly make a list of better strikers out there, but who will be available and willing etc? if rumors are true, he's a target for madrid, which is possibly why Morata or Benzema will be available.