A tisket, a tasket, a goal by Lauren Bassett. She is the best blonde haired player to ever play for Japan. It's pretty sad that Japan only won by one goal again, after having a 12-on-10 advantage.
You're looking at this with USA colored glasses. No, they were not "placed" in the GofD. They put in a place and given 3 other teams to play against. As with any team that wants to advance, they won. Though history, the GofD does not always mean an more difficult group, or that a weaker group is easier. Ask France. You beat the teams you face. Many were predicting Canada to be in the Semis based on home field advantage. And? On paper this looks easy but Cameroon was certainly not an easy match (didn't see the Swiss match). And just because they won by "just one goal" does not mean they are less deserving. Again, you beat the teams you play. Had they won all their matched 6-5, would they more or less deserving? Huh? It would say it was fairly even. Japan had the advantage in fitness, overall, as some of England's players were done. But some of England's players were playing very well. It is my opinion that Japan would have advanced without additional luck in ET. That said, the winning goal was caused by a great pass to a player that was in perfect position. Regardless of the defensive mistake, it was still a goal scoring opportunity. Of course. They won when they had to. Not really. Japan won when they had to. Luck does play a part in victory. Perhaps, but you have also set up an excuse for the US if they lose.
WWC_Movement made a very cogent series of points but people didn't like the conclusion. I'll now go through why soccernutter did not adequately reply to his points, much less refute any Not placed in Group of Death? Huh? What? Everyone in the media called the group which the USA was placed in the Group of Death. Unless you're trying to construct some strange riddle or something why would you disagree with this point? It was obviously the toughest overall group by any measure, and Japan's was one of the easiest I agree Cameroon gave Japan quite the scare in that 2nd half. How does that support your contention that Japan did extremely well? And yes, generally speaking a powerhouse team is more impressive when they won't just win by 1 goal against greatly inferior opposition. Is this breaking news somehow? Look at the goal Japan let in from the Netherlands. How can that not make Japan go down in your eyes? Bizarre You just said it. It is entirely your OPINION that Japan would have beaten England in E.T. You don't know that. Noone does. But what we do know is that England was outplaying Japan especially in the 2nd half. We do know that! I am glad you admit luck plays a part in victory. This is part of why we feel Japan is the greatly weaker Finalist compared to the USA.
one stat; no team that won the Algarve Cup, has gone to win the WC the same year(US won this year's AC). I wouldn't underestimate Japan at all; they made two beautifully accurate long passes that set up both goals. They also have incredible patience getting through when other teams pressure them. But spending time on that 'patience' is exactly why they probably not going to score a bunch of goals or win big
Correct; USA was randomly drawn into the GoD. They were not placed into a rigged group. That would be cheating. You missed his point; see his double-quotes for emphasis. USA was obviously placed into an empty Group D as the seed, to fix its (fans') travel plans. At this point, it's not a GoD yet; it's a blank slate, exactly equal to the other 5 groups. Whatever happened after that was random. (At other WC/WWCs, the seeds are randomly drawn into their groups, so the knockout rounds are also random -- but perhaps that doesn't work so well with a host country as wide as Canada, from Vancouver to Moncton.) Hence, it would be correct for the original poster to have written: USA were drawn into the GoD. Hence the first reply, and this reply.
If you didn't see this ad, it was one of my favorites in the WWC: Class. pic.twitter.com/bOdvE6AYtZ— Jen Beattie MBE (@jbeattie91) July 4, 2015
I've been busy with personal matters so haven't been able to post in a while. Can someone tell WHY on earth didn't Carney start for England vs. Japan? She is their best or one of their best strikers and didn't come on till 10 minutes left! That is INSANE! I expected England to do to Japan what the USA did to Japan. I thought England would come out and overwhelm them and score at least 1 or 2 goals in the 1st half. If they started Carney maybe they would've!
It just makes NO sense whatsoever to leave your best player on the bench for 90% of the game! Talk about SUICIDE!
I just don't care about the matter much anymore. Sampson made a lot of great decisions, but made a couple of head scracthing ones.
I guess you know all too well when we mean business. 6-2 in a final is just good enough. I guess we even meant more business last year at Wembley for the utter disgrace that has happened there.
Relax man, I'm just trolling. Think what you want of England. I'm excited of what they can do at the Euro's. I'm glad I don't have an agenda against any team.
Agenda? Nah, for that you're just not important enough for us. We've had a hard time enough slugging the French.
That was invading Russia in winter. What has this got to do with visiting Paris with a few hundred thousand security agents? Hope you dont feel offended that it's the French(or the Dutch in men's footy) who are the real deal for us. That you take proud in bucking yourselves up by playing filler teams to make it that far into the last tourney is also kinda embarassing now.