Copa America: vs. Brasil, 1 julio (R) (News, etc...)

A mi tambien me gustaria ver a Peric en el arco se lo merece.. pero lo veo dificil.. (bravo para mi no se ve muy seguro.. nos salvo de una goleada pero esta muy nervioso en el arco)

El desastre ese de Fuentes contra Brasil seria una invitacion.. Preferia a Suazo en defensa

Se tiene que jugar con "balls" contra Brasil sin miedo compadres lo que paso, paso.. sigamos adelante!!

...mas encima este no es el mismo Brasil que jugo en Suecia..

Hoy estaba pensando que pena que no tenemos un lider como "il guerriero Zamorano", eso es lo que necesita la seleccion un lider que siempre moje la camiseta y juege con corazon.. p*ta que lo echo de menos!

bueno,
yo paro a chile asi, bien parecido

Pensando que Valdivia pueda jugar...si no Villanueva por Valdivia y Lorca con Suazo

------------Peric
Rocco Riffo Contreras
Fierro Iturra Sanhuesa tello
----------Valdivia
------------------ Villanueva
-------------Suazo

-No me convencio mucho Vargas
-es el momento de provar a Tello me gustaria verlo en la cancha.. siempre me a gustado mark pero el cabro no tiro casi ningun centro.. y seamos honesto le falta futbol..

 

Acosta dejaría afuera a Fernández para duelo con Brasil.

http://www.emol.com/noticias/deportes/detalle/detallenoticias.asp?idnoticia=260998

--

Robinho: "Vamos a jugarle a Chile sin marcas, abiertos".

http://www.emol.com/noticias/deportes/detalle/detallenoticias.asp?idnoticia=261047

--

Valdivia es duda ante Brasil por molestia en planta del pie.

http://www.latercera.cl/medio/articulo/0,0,3308_5804_279203422,00.html

--

Anderson sería reemplazante de Diego ante Chile.

http://www.latercera.cl/medio/articulo/0,0,3308_5804_279207501,00.html

--

Contreras apunta a Brasil: "Lo más conveniente será esperarlos".

http://www.latercera.cl/medio/articulo/0,0,3308_5804_279350623,00.html

Metro

 

A medida que pasa el tiempo me convenzo mas de que a Brasil hay que jugarle ofensivamente... como dijo johansome este no es el mismo equipo que nos goleo 4-0 en Suecia. Tienen muchas falencias defensivas... y con el Chupete en racha, por que no jugarles con un 3-5-2? Yo se que arriesgariamos el fondo... prefiero tener mas ocaciones de gol.

 

A que hora es este partido (horario Chile)?

Metro

 

i hope this time tello will play and we Besiktas fans can watch him live finally...

good luck Chile...

 

I prefer to play defensively and make Brazil desperate.

 

I don't think we possess enough defensive quality to be able to play bunker defense, or mostly all-out defense (and therefore, break out in the counter attack). We just don't.

In all likelihood, we're gonna get scored on anyway, so we might as well take advg. of our good attacking players and try to score ourselves (namely Suazo, Valdivia and Villanueva).

Furthermore, you need the actual players to implement a sytem like that, which we don't. You would need 2 quality CBs (definitely not Vagras/Contreras, much less Fuentes; maybe Riffo and Rocco, though I doubt it), 2 quality defensive mids (we have one that likes to initiate attacks--Sanhueza, one that gets forward a lot--Iturra, and one that is playing like sh!t--Melendez), and actual fullbacks, which we do not have in this squad.

Not to mention that 99.9% of the time when we try to play mostly defensive soccer, we get raped, anyway.

Metro

 

Excelentemente expuesto. En otras palabras... no seamos weones, no ratoniemos.

 

I think Acosta is doing the right thing in this one, bunker the first half and, if Brazil manage to score, and they probably will, attack during the second half with fresh players.

 

Why did we always play for the tie? Why do we have to wait to the 2nd half to attack?

I would attack from the beginning, and jump into the lead. Much like Mexico did.

 

I'll tell you why:

1- Our players are phyisicaly weaker than the brazilians:

This is no secret. They are fitter and stronger than the Chilean squad (on avarage). Mexicans got away with it cause they have a competitive league that also plays many matches on altitude, so they can run and run the 90 minutes. Chileans are not good at this, we usually run a lot and waste all the energy in the first few minutes and then walk for the rest of the match or vice versa, we walk a lot and run in the last minutes, like we did against Ecuador...which leads me to the second point.

2- For strategic reasons:

It is much better and clever if we bunker the first minutes, let Brazil do the hard work and try to score. They will be desperate and it is their desesperation what we must use against them, they will leave spaces and guys like Suazo and Mark can run behind them.

If necesary, in the second half we can go out full force.

 

Or one, for that matter.

Metro

 

aguante CHILE!!!!!!!

C'mon Chilenos I'm rooting for you, I hope you kick some ass today. The selecao is gonna throw the whole kitchen sink at you today. Let's hope you catch 'em sleeping on a counter or set piece.

Final
Chile 2 Brazil 1

 

Dios te escuche, socio!

Metro

 

Tvn has a bad ping. It takes a ****** to load.

 

Go Chile!!!!!!!

 

Estamos jugando bien, pero tengo mis dudas sobre el penal (en Europa no seria). Me conformo con el buen futbol que hemos mostrado y sobre todo el orden: Brasil no tiene por donde y tuvo que conseguir el gol gracias a un penal discutible.

Metro

 

Yep. Ya nos hicieron un gol... y ahora que hacemos, Pelao weon? Ya tienes lo que querias, gil... un gol en contra.

 

Jugando a la defensiva estamos jugando mejor que ellos.
Tranquilos, cabros: viene el empate. Lo siento!

Metro

 

see this ref is a disgrace

think Chile still have a chance