First winners of the SKHSR (Sorta Kinda High Speed Rail) funding sweepstakes announced. Initial baby step on the long path towards having a legit 21st century national intermodal transportation system...thought about.
I thought that's what Obama was doing with Florida this morning? Launching an 8B high speed rail line?
The vote in California was to provide state funding (via bonds) to start paying for the line -- this is federal funding which will be in addition to the state funding. The overall plan is something like $30-40 billion -- the state bonds so far are ~$10 billion, and now there is an additional $2.25 billion from the feds -- we still have a ways to go in paying for this thing.
Voting for it and getting way ahead of the curve in terms of planning for it meant you Californians get the lions' share of the federal HSR money, as far as I can tell. As opposed to say, our slothlike New England governors, who came up with their plan about 20 minutes ago.
If I'm reading it right, the dotted lines indicated money that will be spent on foundational work necessary to convert to high speed later but will not become high speed lines as a result of this expenditure.
Probably just improvements to the regular passenger line - for example, I don't think there ever will be a high-speed train to San Luis Obispo in California. But some of these I don't get. Madison, WI only has a half-million people (unless they are very serious about eventually connecting to Minneapollis, which actually does have a great deal of air traffic with Chicago).
It's not a free market - air and ground travel are heavily subsidized, much more than rail. Of course the railroad companies got their land mostly for free, but that was in the 19th century.
Every facet of coordinated public transportation is subsidized somehow, everywhere around the globe. (Or paid for via donations from wealthy barons, etc). In US developmental history, automobile interests co-opted to hasten the fall of the inner-city rail services, and as the nation grew larger in both population and urbanizing geography, it did so with more and more people and development patterns evolving around the car as opposed to mass transit. The US, as a continental nation, simply matured at a time when there wasn't a dynamic need to build transit oriented development. Alas, given the costs and permanence of land development it will now cost the nation tons to recover that level of efficiency, if ever. Edit: Just saw your post above. My meter must be off... - - - What gets me is the Tampa-Orlando run. I mean, they're telling me THAT 84 miles is crucial to the national rail network? No offense, but even in late revisions of the 90's Florida Overland Xpress project that was the last priority for Floridians. At least anything along the Miami-Orlando-Jacksonville corridor would've also contributed to the grand Eastern Seaboard concept. CHI-STL Hey, who didn't see this one coming? Seriously, though, worth it IMO. Heard LA-LV wasn't directly sponsored due to costs, but was still expecting something to go that way. Glad to see Raleigh-Charlotte getting some attention, and hoping that means Atlanta's improved accessibility is not too far behind. Takes the train overnight to get from there to DC right now; I can drive it 2 hours faster. Hopefully at some time of plenty in the not too distant future they'll be able to cough up the $50B it will need to make this stuff a reality, then the urban forms and efficiencies for the US will really take off.
the free market takes its time to react to needs that involve heavy capital investment, like large infrastructure projects. the free market would take care of it eventually, but it would be a slow, painful transition.
The free market will only provide it when 1) The railroads are given fair and equitable grounds to compete with the currently subsidized roads and air travel, and 2) When it makes financial sense. There are only a handful of lines in the entire world where it makes financial sense.
Never been to Atlanta myself, but if it's going to become the southeastern hub it was and should be, one that ties together NY/the mid-Atlantic, FL, New Orleans and Chicago, they'll have to do something about a proper terminal, no? Not to say that an edifice along the lines of #3 on this list would ever be erected again, but as I understand it, the current station is a ways out there relative to the city center and nothing much to talk about.