I don't see the US as a favorite to host the 2021 CWC anyway. With the 2026 WC taking place in the US already I predict FIFA going after other commercial markets they are interested in. Markets that feature prominently on the FIFA sponsor list. Yes, China. 7 of 19 corporate sponsors at Russia 2018 were Chinese. They are not eligible to bid for the WC until 2034. The 2021 CWC is probably the first bone thrown their way to bridge the gap. And Alibaba is presenting partner of the CWC until...wait for it...2022.
They're now in Amsterdam: ECA chairman Andrea Agnelli (pictured) said his members were collectively agreed on boycotting the event as it stands now because of an already congested calendar, despite reports that one or two major clubs were privately in favour. - insideworldfootball.com https://uk.reuters.com/article/uk-s...-to-play-in-2021-club-world-cup-idUKKCN1R71PW To which lengths is Infantino willing to go in order to push his expanded CWC through? Confed Cup already scrapped. Need a decision about 2022 soon. Can't keep your own flagship tournament hostage. Confeds need to finalize their WCQ formats and the draw should take place this July instead of postponing it. Is it out of the question to compromise wrt the CWC expansion? Like UEFA, CONMEBOL also prefers the December window because holding it in June interferes with the leagues. A good, old-fashioned horse trade about the calendar post-2024.
SoftBank Said to Be Sidelined by Soccer Clubs in FIFA's New Cup: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...e-sidelined-by-soccer-clubs-in-fifa-s-new-cup
I will say this: since normally FIFA breaks up the prize money for participating teams to a threshold prize for participating and bonuses earned with games won and advancement in the tournament, I would hope that teams that qualify early show some gratitude and award that first bit of money (the participation prize) to the players who got them there.
So, now that the December CWC is no more, European leagues will leave that break period fallow for players to recover... LOL no, the RFEF is already talking about making the Spanish Super Cup a Final 4 tournament in January Hence me always taking claims of "we need to give players more rest" with a grain of salt.
The Spanish Super Cup is held right before the season, and unlike the English Community Shield, Spain uses two legs. Moving it to January would lengthen the summer break for the clubs in the Super Cup, although they might just play more friendlies instead. I don't care much either way. Edit: I see that 2018 had one game in Morocco for the first time instead of two legs.
The Supercopa is usually played around the second or third week of August with La Liga kicking off the weekend after. La Liga halts for the winter break for Christmas/New Years and re-starts the first weekend in January (as long as January 1st doesn't fall on a weekend). The two-legged Copa del Rey knockout ties also take up the whole of midweeks in January/early February (six consecutive midweeks). If the Supercopa is moved I can see them bringing forward the start of La Liga by a week or two. This would then open up space in January for this ridiculous four-team Super proposal, a proposal which includes switching the Copa del Rey to single one-off ties until the semifinals.
Gianni Infantino: Expanded Fifa Club World Cup 'important' for Asian football https://www.thenational.ae/sport/fo...rld-cup-important-for-asian-football-1.845661 Preaching to the choir I see. When is he attending a UEFA event?
Well, if Copa del Rey ties are reduced from two-legged rounds to single match KO then there really isn't a problem with fixture congestion at all. Easy to fit-in the 4-team Supercopa (which I agree sounds stupid). 5 midweek matchdays are suddenly freed-up if CdR has just one leg per round.
@BocaFan @Blondo @EvanJ Ok, ok, a more realistic suggestion on my end: what about if, for those confederations with 3 berths in the new CWC and 4 different champions, they rank them based on their coefficient over the 4-year period in question and then have the two lowest-ranked sides play for the last berth? That way, no CL edition is inherently worth more or less than another at the outset; and if you have a Year 1 winner who's been back regularly to the CL since, they have a shot at qualifying directly based on consistent form over a fly-by-night winner showing up just before the CWC.
I'm okay with that, but Concacaf doesn't have coefficients for clubs or leagues. They have coefficients for spots such as MEX 1. AFC has coefficients for countries, but not for clubs. It could produce unique situations, such as a club already eliminated or that did not participate in the CL in progress clinching a CWC spot without a playoff when a club with a better coefficient gets eliminated or there is a repeat winner. For example, if the first three are won by X, Y, and Z; and the fourth Final is between Y and Z, all three will know before that game that they're going to the CWC. If the first three are won by X, Y, and Z; the fourth Final is between Y and Q; and X has the worst coefficient of the four; X will want Y to beat Q. The possibility of repeat winners is similar to how American MLS clubs can qualify for the CCL from the regular season, MLS Cup, or U.S. Open Cup.
Calculating them for clubs is straightforward, though, since we thankfully have the formula at our disposal. For instance, the 2018-21 cycle to date: CF Monterrey - 5 wins (15) - 2 draws (2) - 3 stages advanced (3) - 1 participation (4) - 1 championship (2) Total: 26 pts Chivas de Guadalajara - 5 wins (15) - 1 draw (1) - 3 stages advanced (3) - 1 participation (4) - 1 championship (2) Total: 25 pts Non-champions (Team: 2018 pts + 2019 pts = Total) Tigres UANL: 12 + 20 = 32 New York Red Bulls: 17 + 11 = 28 Toronto FC: 21 + 5 = 26 Santos Laguna: 0 + 21 = 21 Club América: 17 + 0 = 17 --- For instance, (and for the sake of simplicity), let's say that Tigres and Toronto win the next two CCLs with Monterrey and Chivas failing to qualify for either. Then, Tigres and Toronto would get direct berths to the CWC, while Monterrey and Chivas would enter a playoff for the last berth.
I think it would be much better to replace the current six continental championships with these four: African Champions League 32 champions from these countries qualify: Nigeria Ethiopia Egypt DR Congo South Africa Tanzania Kenya Sudan Algeria Uganda Morocco Mozambique Ghana Angola Côte d'Ivoire Madagascar Cameroon Niger Burkina Faso Mali Malawi Zambia Somalia Senegal Chad Zimbabwe Rwanda Tunisia Guinea Benin Burundi South Sudan American Champions League 32 champions from these countries qualify: United States Brazil Mexico Colombia Argentina Canada Peru Venezuela Chile Ecuador Guatemala Cuba Bolivia Haiti Dominican Republic Honduras Paraguay Nicaragua El Salvador Costa Rica Panama Puerto Rico Uruguay Jamaica Trinidad and Tobago Guyana Suriname The Bahamas Belize Barbados St. Lucia St. Vincent and the Grenadines Asian Champions League 32 champions from these countries qualify: China India Indonesia Pakistan Bangladesh Japan Philippines Vietnam Iran Thailand Myanmar Korea Afghanistan Iraq Uzbekistan Malaysia Nepal Saudi Arabia Yemen DPR Korea Australia Taiwan Sri Lanka Syria Cambodia Tajikistan United Arab Emirates Papua New Guinea Hong Kong Jordan Kyrgyzstan Laos European Champions League 32 champions from these countries qualify: Russia Germany Turkey France England Italy Spain Ukraine Poland Romania Kazakhstan Netherlands Belgium Greece Czech Republic Portugal Sweden Azerbaijan Hungary Belarus Austria Switzerland Israel Bulgaria Serbia Denmark Finland Slovak Republic Scotland Norway Ireland Croatia The other nations can add their best clubs in one of the leagues above. This way, we can see a true CHAMPIONS league again. The four continental champions can then play each other in the FIFA Club World Cup to determine the world champions.
Ah, the old Champions Cup set-up. Sadly, those days are long gone, my friend No way in hell UEFA would pass on the runners-up in La Liga and the EPL in favor of the Finnish and Azeri champs.
FIFA has announced the Club World Cup will be held in 2019 with the same 7-team format of the past several years. In June, the host nation will be announced.
If FIFA's actually planning on having a 7-team CWC in 2020, then here we have Infantino talking out of both sides of his mouth. Wasn't the whole idea that he would use his Thanos glove and disappear the current CWC and the Confed Cup from the calendar, so that the new 24-team tournament would have a net-zero effect on the # of fixtures for elite teams? I thought that FIFA was basically stuck with the 2019 CWC, but would drop the 2020 edition.
Too much time and energy is being devoted to expanding a CWC that will always have limited potential. Even an increase to 24 clubs would probably only involve representation from around 15 countries and most likely result in an all-UEFA tournament from the quarterfinals on. This would underscore how much of a gap there actually is between top European clubs and clubs from the rest of the world, and would probably diminish interest in top-tier competitions from other confederations. Creating more competitive games for national teams, many of which actually need them, and grouping countries based on results would be much more appealing for fans, which is why a Global Nations League is where the focus and resources should be placed.
The disparity will likely happen given the fact that only one team will make it out of each group. I would propose 2 teams making it out of each group, even though that would mean a majority of the teams would advance. It would provide for more confederational diversity and an increased likelyhood of an upset happening since the knockout stages are only dependent on 90 minutes of football (as opposed to dependency on multiple matches in the group stage) However I figure the real reason for expanding the CWC was precisely to diminish the participation of AFC/OFC/CAF teams and have more powerhouse European teams facing each others in knockouts. Just look at the last CWC -- how many people actually tuned in to watch Al Ain vs. Real Madrid? Yet if Real Madrid is facing, say, Liverpool or Man CIty in even QFs in 2021, they'll have probably 10x the audience, even if it's not a title-deciding match like the Al Ain game was. Basically the idea of an expanded CWC opening the doors to more international participation is a facade for creating a new all-European knockout tournament (probably with the exception of 1-2 South American sides) that will capture similar global attention as the Champions League, something the old CWC clearly could not do
Qatar gets the 2019 and 2020 CWC as a Confederations Cup replacement. Given today's announcement I am glad we get two editions to say goodbye to the current CWC format. It also gives FIFA a way out if it can't get the expanded format off the ground in 2021. In that scenario they can just keep the annual format. And from a sporting perspective it also means the rest of the world gets two more opportunities to steal a world title. Go ahead, bet your life savings on China being host in 2021. After the 2021 edition I would like to see the CWC always awarded to a confederation other than the World Cup host. So for 2025 it would exclude CONCACAF. I for one wouldn't mind a CWC in South America that year.