Changes to the Rep System

Discussion in 'Customer Service' started by Huss, Aug 25, 2004.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Iceblink

    Iceblink Member

    Oct 11, 1999
    Chicago
    Club:
    Ipswich Town FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, I kinda think this sucks.

    I went from being "a name known to all" to having one little green block and being on a distinguished road again.

    There was some rep I was proud of, from people important to me.

    This system kind of screws people who don't post all that much but post good stuff when they do.

    I think this needed to be a gradual shift... like... keep things for 100 days at first and have those gradually drop off... not like this. This was so sudden, and I lost almost everything.

    I really don't understand the point. I mean, it was annoying before, when I couldn't rep people who deserved it for two posts in completely unrelated forums.

    Personally, I think the limits should be taken off (if they haven't). Frankly, I was getting annoyed with those "You must spread some reputation around..." posts.
     
  2. Bajoro

    Bajoro Member+

    Sep 10, 2000
    The Inland Empire
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Is there a page that explains Rep Points in detail? If it exists, I couldn't find it.

    Thanks.
     
  3. Rocket

    Rocket Member

    Aug 29, 1999
    Chicago
    Club:
    Everton FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The pot calling the kettle black.
     
  4. Huss

    Huss Member

    Aug 1, 1995
    New York, NY
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Re: yeah

    Did you read gekman's post?
     
  5. Casper

    Casper Member+

    Mar 30, 2001
    New York
    Re: yeah

    I think the time frame is far too short. Contributions age well for more than a month.
     
  6. Cannon

    Cannon Member

    Arsenal
    United States
    Sep 2, 2001
    Washington, DC metro
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Re: yeah

    I did but somehow missed the point. So from now on it 60-90 and just this first cut was off. Got it.
     
  7. Casper

    Casper Member+

    Mar 30, 2001
    New York
    Re: yeah

    Point of Order:

    In US Soccer terms, 60-90 days is equal to "Any indefinite time frame long enough that you may forget when I said this."

    Usage: "The Metrostars will announce a stadium development in 60-90 days."

    IMO, this makes 60-90 days the PERFECT time frame for all BigSoccer decisions.
     
  8. Huss

    Huss Member

    Aug 1, 1995
    New York, NY
    Club:
    New York Red Bulls
    Re: yeah

    Yes. Just a screw up, unfort, on the first one.
     
  9. Lowecifer

    Lowecifer Member+

    Jan 11, 2000
    Baltimore, MD
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    Belgium
    I like the change, but I still think I got hosed in the deal. I demand a recount!

    :)
     
  10. swedcrip34

    swedcrip34 New Member

    Mar 17, 2004
    I disapprove.
     
  11. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I like this the new system. Now we'll be able to find out who are the really good posters instead of the popular ones. Good work Huss.
     
  12. mpruitt

    mpruitt Member

    Feb 11, 2002
    E. Somerville
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    This was probably going to be done eventually no matter what. As people are generally more supportive than destructive and with a number of people who on a consistent basis contribute well at some point you were going to have a bunch of people who reach a rep ceiling so to speak. While I don't like the fact that historically poor posters get a pass now, at very least they'll have an opportunity at rep redemption for whatever that's worth.
     
  13. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States

    It'll be the same as before.
     
  14. Shabs

    Shabs Member

    Jun 19, 2002
    NYC
    Er, no. For the most part, the most nipples will go to the popular users who post a ton (i.e. the community threaders), and not as much for the popular users who dont post as much. So nothing's really changed.
    Also, for the referee forum argument; any user whos been on a particular forum in BS long enough to know what nipples represent has been on long enough to know who the good/bad posters are in that forum.
     
  15. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I've often thought that a good way to prevent people's rep from getting too high is just reduce the number of points each repping is worth. I'd prefer that to a system in which it expires in just a couple of months.
     
  16. dfb547490

    dfb547490 New Member

    Feb 9, 2000
    The Heights
    Not that I really care, but I don't see how it changes anything, as the rep system hasn't been aroudn for much more than 60-90 days IIRC.

    BTW, is rep given by any poster now equal, because that's how it seems on my "My BigSoccer" screen? Which would suck, because two of the dozens of respected BigSoccer posters who have given me positive rep would then have their voices cancelled out by verybdog and Metrogo. :D
     
  17. tpmazembe

    tpmazembe Member

    Jun 13, 2002
    The Midfield (S.Fla)
    Could someone in the know address this question? I noticed some inconsistencies as well.
     
  18. Dan Loney

    Dan Loney BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 10, 2000
    Cincilluminati
    Club:
    Los Angeles Sol
    Nat'l Team:
    Philippines
    Yesterday my posts were great and today they suck and I'm sad
     
  19. Bill Archer

    Bill Archer BigSoccer Supporter

    Mar 19, 2002
    Washington, NC
    Club:
    Columbus Crew
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I...I'm sorry sweetheart....this never happened to me before. It's not you, really, it's me. Tough day at work, lots of stress. Maybe some Viagra.
     
  20. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Oh, i was lead to believe that this new system would eliminate someone trying to get a lot of rep points at a specific point at time and make it look like he's a great poster unlike someone else who has collected the points on a steady basis for a long period of time.
     
  21. Barbara

    Barbara BigSoccer Supporter

    Apr 29, 2000
    Club:
    DC United
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It is definitely not the case that everyone gives/takes away the same number of points.
     
  22. ElJefe

    ElJefe Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Colorful Colorado
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Heh, heh, heh.

    They're so naive at that age.
     
  23. ElJefe

    ElJefe Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Colorful Colorado
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Anyway, I'm with the people who think that this was a solution in search of a problem.
     
  24. JMMUSA8

    JMMUSA8 New Member

    Nov 3, 2001
    Webster
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Alright, I'll just go back to my home on the Revs board.
     
  25. ElJefe

    ElJefe Moderator
    Staff Member

    Feb 16, 1999
    Colorful Colorado
    Club:
    FC Dallas
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If I may say so, I think that a quick look at the members list, sorted by reputation, should show why this move was a bit dumb.

    Under the old system, you generally had BigSoccer's best posters and most consistent contributors up at the top of the list. Now, you've got some of those same posters behind some real asshats who might've in the past month written their one bon mot for the year.

    Of course, an astute observer will probably note that I am including myself in that list of "best posters," but honestly, I don't really give a rip who I'm behind. After all, I'm a moderator and I don't really give two craps what other posters think of me in the forums that I moderate, since in the end, I've got the hammer.

    I can understand why this change was made, but I don't think that it's going to work out quite as well as you'd like with such a short expiry date. The thing to do is to reduce the amount that other posters can affect your rep and to pick a much longer life for rep (like six months). That way, the cream will more visably rise to the top, while you don't have posters with the ungodly amounts of rep that you saw before the change.
     

Share This Page