2015 Revs Prediction Thread

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by patfan1, Mar 5, 2015.

?

How many points will the Revs get in 2015?

Poll closed Mar 8, 2015.
  1. Less than 30

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. 31-35

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  3. 36-40

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  4. 41-45

    3.1%
  5. 46-50

    9.4%
  6. 51-55

    34.4%
  7. 56-60

    34.4%
  8. 60+

    18.8%
  1. Jon Martin

    Jon Martin Member+

    Apr 25, 2000
    SE Mass
    This comes closest to expressing my view. Regression to the mean should be kicking in. Last year we had almost no significant injuries; we can't expect that to hold indefinitely. We will not have access to JJ and LN at times. We also have very little depth.

    However, there is nothing to say (other than 18 (17?) years of club history), that we can't pick up significant players during the season. Furthermore, there are huge advantages to playing together for years. Lastly, I have a really good feeling about Okoli.

    So I guess I'm in the 51-55 group.
     
    RevsLiverpool repped this.
  2. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    #27 henryo, Mar 7, 2015
    Last edited: Mar 7, 2015
    Methods explained:

    http://forums.bigsoccer.com/threads...s-projection-by-most-recent-meetings.2009760/

    Basically, the most recent, corresponding Home / Road results vs every other opponent are expected to repeat themselves once or twice in 2015 (except NYCFC & OCSC where 1-1 applies).

    For NER, the most recent results vs other Eastern Teams can be derived from those in 2014 season.

    However, results vs Western Teams would date back to 2013, base on the Home / Road match-up with them in alternating seasons, due to the Imbalanced Schedule currently in place.

    Hence, through the combinations of:
    • home/road scores for each conference from different seasons,
    • schedule changes across seasons, and
    • the late form of last season;
    the Projected W-L-T Outcomes are not simply a carbon copy of the previous season, especially in the case of NER:
    • 2014 Actuals: 17W-13L-4T, 55 points.
    • 2015 Projection: 14W-9L-11T, 53 points.
    For Cup Nemesis LA Galaxy, the differences are even more drastic:
    • 2014 Actuals: 17W-7L-10T, 61 points.
    • 2015 Projection: 12W-10L-12T, 48 points.
     
  3. Joeyfitzclick

    Joeyfitzclick Member

    Jun 9, 2008
    Newport RI
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Ireland Republic
  4. VTSoccerFan

    VTSoccerFan Member+

    New England Revolution, Vermont Catamounts, NCFC
    United States
    Jun 28, 2002
    Cary, NC
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    In the original thread I voted 46 - 50 points. My thought was that we will probably miss some key players (3+) for more games than last year. I guess I see us more in the 51 - 55 range. MLS is an odd beast. Very difficult to predict.
     
  5. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    LA is projected to finish with 10 losses and less points than the revs? That's pretty funny.
     
    henryo repped this.
  6. henryo

    henryo Member+

    Jun 26, 2007
    #31 henryo, Mar 9, 2015
    Last edited: Mar 9, 2015
    Yes, that's the fun part about the Projection Method, that the new season is not simply a replica of the last.

    TBH, I was equally surprised to see LAG projected at 5th in the West (esp. after the near miss on SS last season), but upon further verifications, the outcome was unmistakable:
     
  7. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Revs are currently 9-9-7 (34 pts), with 9 games left.

    So, they need to go 7-2-0 just to match last year's 55 pts.
     
    dncm and henryo repped this.
  8. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    It's always funny to look at this thread later in the year and see how wrong most people (myself included this time around) were.
     
  9. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Someone said the revs had a "decent chance to compete for 3 trophies." I guess "decent" and "compete" are subjective terms but knowing how we rarely are legit SS contenders come the fall and never have the depth to seriously compete in the USOC, it still made me laugh.
     
  10. BERich

    BERich Member+

    Feb 3, 2012
    New England
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If the Revs win 7 out of the last 9, then I'll be good!! 5 of the remaining games are against the bottom 4 teams in the east. So hey, anything is possible!
     
  11. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I voted in the 56-60 range like a lot of people did. Shows you how much I know! Pass me some of that Kool-Aid, I'm thirsty!
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  12. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    With two games to go, 18 voters are out, while 14 are still looking like they might be right.
     
    henryo repped this.
  13. BERich

    BERich Member+

    Feb 3, 2012
    New England
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As one who is out; I'll at least say I was right in my belief that the Revs would have more ties this year than last year. My problem was that I was reducing last year's loses with ties and the Revs this year also went and reduced wins to ties! :(
     
  14. IRguy

    IRguy Member

    Sep 28, 2004
    Vermont
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Don't feel too bad guys and gals, there are only a couple of teams that have a shot at more the 55pt. this season and they will need to win out to do so(somewhat unlikely).

    Kind of a weird season, pretty much every team as looked pretty bad for long streaks with the expectation of maybe Vancouver who have maybe been the most consistent team this year.
     
  15. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Even they had a pretty bad patch at one point during the season, but of course, nowhere near as bad as ours. While the idea of avoiding a 10-game winless streak is always a good idea, maybe the goal should only be to have a 3 or 4 game streak.

    56-60 points?! Man, I must have been really thirsty to make that prediction, cause I was surely drinking a lot of Kool-Aid!
     
  16. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    I would guess that this is probably about the most balanced, parity-wise, season the league has ever had. Not only are both conferences in contention for the supporter's shield this late, but only a few teams were eliminated from the playoffs up until the last week or so.

    And, even the weakest teams in the league have been able to live up to the "on any given day ..." standard.

    Pretty much every team that could be considered among the best in the league at one point or another, have also had some pretty brutal stretches: DCU, RB, LAG, Sea, Dallas, Revs, Vanc, Tor, ...
     
  17. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Nostradamus! :) You ended up being accurate in multiple ways with this post, congrats. (bolding mine). I was one of the pessimists that said 46-50 and we're just about there. Factoring in JJ's injury, Agudelo not meeting expectations and very little depth, here we are, about .500 heading into the home stretch.
     
    TheLostUniversity and Jon Martin repped this.
  18. Jon Martin

    Jon Martin Member+

    Apr 25, 2000
    SE Mass
    Thanks, brother.
     
  19. rkane1226

    rkane1226 Member+

    Apr 9, 2000
    Club:
    Stade Brestois 29
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Yay, I predicted accurately...:rolleyes:
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  20. RevsLiverpool

    RevsLiverpool Member+

    Nov 12, 2005
    Boston
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Are the revs not predictable? Just kind of sadly funny when you throw a dart at a bullseye and you're actually right.
     
  21. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Not me! I throw the dart first, and then I paint the bullseye around it. It works every time!
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  22. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The KADs say the NNNs dominate this board, yet 28 of 32 predicted the Revs would finish with more points than they actually did.
     
    TheLostUniversity, Crooked and patfan1 repped this.
  23. Revs in 2010

    Revs in 2010 Member+

    Feb 29, 2000
    Roanoke, VA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Are you sayin we got crappy NNN's?:eek: Come on -- We invented NNN's!!
     
    TheLostUniversity repped this.
  24. rkupp

    rkupp Member+

    Jan 3, 2001
    The comments are a lot more enlightening than a one-time poll, done at the height of anticipation of the new season.
     
  25. TheLostUniversity

    Los Angeles Galaxy
    Feb 4, 2007
    Greater Boston
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Now, how about a Playoff Prediction survey?....;)
     

Share This Page