2015 AFC Club Competition Rankings

Discussion in 'AFC: Tournaments' started by fridge46, Apr 24, 2014.

  1. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    #1 fridge46, Apr 24, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 24, 2014
    As already discussed, from next year, the distribution of Champions League and AFC Cup spots will be determined by a ranking. This will be made up using both club results and international rankings:

    - Club: Results from the past 4 club competition seasons (2011-2014) will make up 70% of the total rating;
    - International: Exact how this segment will be determined is unknown (FIFA Ranking? Results since 2011 in AFC Cup and World Cup qualifiers?), but will make up 30% of the ranking.

    Calculations of club competitions also have not been released, however, an indication of how these may be determined was found in the 2013 ACL assessment criteria (see here), but to summarise:

    - All matches will be allocated 3 points for a win, 1 point for a draw, and 0 for a loss;
    - Play-off matches will not be counted;
    - Bonus point for progression from group stage to L16, L16 to QF, QF to SF and SF to Final;
    - Total points collected for each country are divided by the number of teams said country had competing;
    - Points collected via AFC Cup are divided by 3;
    - There is no mention of AFC Presidents Cup.

    I have applied this to calculate the ranking of teams from the start of 2011 to the end of this group phase of 2014:
    upload_2014-4-24_22-39-32.png

    Points here will make up 70% of the final ranking (how these will be standardised with International Ratings is yet to be determined).

    In the final rankings, competition spots will be distributed via:

    - 1-24 (red) will receive ACL slots (direct group stage slots will be determined via assessment criteria).
    - 25-32 (yellow) will receive direct AFC Cup slots.
    - 33-47 (purple) will receive AFC Cup play-offs slots.

    Green shows countries still active in either 2014 ACL or AFC Cup.

    Countries that have not sent clubs into competition in the last four years are ranked using the current FIFA rankings of their national teams (as I dont know how these will be calculated).

    Additionally, below is the ranking including AFC President Cup results. I have assumed that points gained will be divided by 9:
    upload_2014-4-24_23-12-36.png

    If anyone notices any mistakes, please let me know. I will post updated tables after each round of competition to use as a reference of how countries are progressing and likely make up of 2015 ACL and AFC Cup.
     
    VLeague1, Edgar, artml and 2 others repped this.
  2. mdhm

    mdhm Member

    Southern District FC
    Hong Kong
    Nov 7, 2010
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Hong Kong
    I think AFC will use the FIFA ranking points for the 30% of international performance rating.

    I am also curious on the countries with higher FIFA ranking but not participated much in the 3 levels of club competitions, e.g. North Korea and Afghanistan, will they get 0/70 for the club performance rating?
     
  3. thewitness

    thewitness Member

    Melbourne Victory, Derby County
    Australia
    Jul 10, 2013
    Club:
    Derby County FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    You have skipped position #39 in both of your tables.
     
  4. thewitness

    thewitness Member

    Melbourne Victory, Derby County
    Australia
    Jul 10, 2013
    Club:
    Derby County FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    The AFC like using proportions for the assessment criteria, so i took the 2013 ACL club points system you used above and combined it with current FIFA rankings to produce what I would think the ratings would look like currently. Sth Korea's 60.000 club points was deemed the Max and given the full 70% available for the Club part of the ratings. All other countries were scored proportionally. Similarly Iran's 715 FIFA rankings points was deemed the Max and given the full 30% available for the International part of the ratings. Although they may not use FIFA rankings in the end and might go with performances in Asian Cup and World Cup Qualifying.
    Any way here is the table that that produces (this doesn't include Presidents Cup points):
    ACC.jpg
     
  5. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    #5 fridge46, Apr 28, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2014
    I agree that this is how I read things will be done. However I applied this these methods using the latest FIFA ranking to the 2013 assessment and got nowhere near the results the AFC got. I might have another go today.

    Just for reference, part of the 2013 assessment took into account club and international performances. This was worth 200 points out of a total of 1000. 140 of these were based off club rankings, 60 for international. The a brief method of this calculation (though not complete) can be found here (page 2) and the final points calculation can be found here (under the column "Technical Standard, page 4)
     
  6. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    #6 fridge46, Apr 28, 2014
    Last edited: Apr 28, 2014
    So after some fishing around, I found a document explain how the 2013 AFC Champions League Technical Standard Criteria was calculated.

    Firstly, the AFC decided to use 2009-2012, rather than 2010-2012!!!!!

    The calculations are as I and @thewitness have discussed previous. I have managed to recreate the 2013 ranking almost exactly (there a a few values that make no sense whatsoever). However, some interesting points regarding penalty shoutouts:

    1) In single leg matches, if a penalties are required to get a winner, the winner gets 3 points, the loser 0. ie -

    2013 CL L16: Al-Jazira v Al-Ahli, 3-3(aet); 2-4 penalties

    Al-Jazira had 0 points added to UAE ranking for 2013. Al-Ahli added 3 points to KSA ranking.

    2) In home/away legs, if penalties are required to get a winner, the winner of the shootout gets 3 points for that leg, regardless of the results after extra time. ie -

    2011 AC QF L1: Chonburi 0-1 Nasaf Qarshi
    L2: Nasaf 0-1 Chonburi (aet); 4-3 penalties

    Nasaf Qarshi added 6 points to UZB ranking. Chonburi added 0 points to THA ranking.

    Additionally, where groups have had teams withdrawn, results against the withdraw team are void. Points gained by teams are multiplied by 0.66 (ie Team A has 4 points from 4 games will actually add 6 points to the ranking). Also, the withdrawn team is treated as if they have not enter the competetion (ie Sharjah of UAE withdrew after 4 games of the 2009 CL. UAE points for 2009 was calculated added all points gained by UAE teams and dividing by 3, rather than 4. This could be important if Ninh Binh are disqualified from this years AFC Cup).
     
  7. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    2015 Rankings taking into account the above posts:

    upload_2014-4-28_19-52-58.png

    This includes all group stage matches and bonus points for L16.

    *I think the 23th October 2014 FIFA Ranking will be used for the final ranking, of course, these points will change monthly. For reference, teams with red numbers are playing in the FIFA World Cup, and those in purple will play in the AFC Challenge Cup.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. dinamo_zagreb

    dinamo_zagreb Member+

    Jun 27, 2010
    San Jose, CA / Zagreb, Croatia
    Club:
    --other--
    Nat'l Team:
    Croatia
    I wonder how on Earth they come up with an idea of joining club and national teams results for club competitions coefficients. :rolleyes:

    Are there any infos on how will this allocation look like? How many leagues will get 4 slots, 3 slots, etc, will there be equal number of slots for both conferences (East, West) and stuff like that?

    BTW, great stuff, guys!
     
  9. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    Zero word on allocation, as far as I know. Several formats have been "announced" over the years, but ultimately AFC Executive Committee, from under advice of the AFC Competitions Committee, will decided among themselves which countries get however many spots. There have been years when they have totally ignored rankings and suggestions from the Competition Committee, so who knows?!?!

    Earlier this year it was announced that the top 24 ranked nations will get CL playoff spots. They still need to pass other BS criteria set the ExCo to receive direct spots. Discussion on in the past can be found here. Countries ranked 25-32 get direct AFC Cup spots and 33-47 get AFC Cup playoff spots. But I wouldn't bet my mortgage on any of that happening.

    However, from now until at least 2016, East and West will be separated until the final. So in theory, we should see 16 teams in each half for the group stage. Of course the middle countries could end up in either half. India is considered west, but was in the east qualifiers this year and in the past, a team from Uzbekistan found their way into the east too.

    But ultimately, nothing is set in stone until the november ExCo meeting. Anything announced should be treated with caution until we see the final announcement because lets face it, this is the AFC, they like nothing more than making things as they go along!!!
     
  10. druryfire

    druryfire Member

    Sep 10, 2007
    England
    From the UAE Pro League Committee:

    Based upon the recent announcement of changes to AFC Champions League qualification criteria, Al Romaithi explained that the number of slots awarded to UAE clubs in next year’s competition will be decided 70% by clubs’ results in the ACL, and 30% by National Team ranking. The Chairman of the PLC stated that based upon current stats – and the guarantee that one UAE team will reach at least the Quarter Finals of this year’s competition – it can be anticipated that the UAE will be handed 2 direct slots and 2 play-off slots in the 2015 edition of the tournament, but the exact number and distribution of slots will not be confirmed by the AFC until November.

    http://web.agleague.ae/en/news/plc-board-meeting8.html
     
  11. greenlion

    greenlion Member

    Apr 22, 2004
    CHINA
    Club:
    Beijing Guoan
    Nat'l Team:
    China PR
    according to souces from china, slot distribution will be like this:
    based on the ranking of the two zone, west and east

    1st place and 2nd place country will get 3+1
    3rd place and 4th place country will get 2+2
    5th place country get 1+2
    6th place country will get 1+1

    lower ranking countries who is ranked into top 24 will also get play-off slots
     
  12. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    So this confirms what @druryfire posted yesterday. If this holds true, 24 teams gain automatic groups stage spots with 32 teams fighting for the remaining 8 berths.

    Will be interesting what format they go with for the play-offs. I would go with a straight 2 round knockout, each round over 2 legs (for 4 match days). But I have a feeling that the AFC will go with a similar system to this year whereby 16 teams start in QR1, 8 in QR2 then 8 in QR3, each over 1 leg.

    I have used the current ranking of the top 24 in post #7 (without Presidents Cup results) to guesstimate the allocation of slots:

    upload_2014-5-6_16-33-23.png

    * If both AFC Cup finalists are from the West, I predict a UZB team will switch to the East; if both come from the East, I predict IND will switch to the West.

    Also of note is that Australia are limited to 3 slots, so their 4th berth maybe reallocated (IDN maybe?) or not used at all. Additionally, I dont know what will happen if a teams qualify via league and being AFC Cup finalists.
     
  13. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    Updated Rankings after Last 16 matches in ACL and AFC Cup, includes bonus points for reaching quarter finals. Also May FIFA points added. For rankings with Presidents Cup, groups stage results have been added:

    upload_2014-5-14_21-0-26.png

    Potential ACL allocation as it stands:

    upload_2014-5-14_20-57-39.png

    Next update on June 6th, which will take into account Challenge Cup and pre-World Cup friendlies.
     

    Attached Files:

  14. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    Updated Rankings taking into account the new FIFA Rankings. These include pre-World Cup friendlies and the AFC Challenge Cup:

    upload_2014-6-5_16-1-25.png

    Biggest gainers are Challenge Cup winners Palestine. Their national team is now ranked 10th in the AFC and subsequently move into the top 24 in the club allocation rankings.

    Below is a guesstimate of how the ACL slot allocation stands given the information we currently know:
    upload_2014-6-5_16-5-25.png

    * As there is 17 teams in the West play/offs and 15 in the East using the current standings, I am assuming one of the UZB teams will transfer to the East.
     
  15. Matilda Maniac

    Matilda Maniac Big Soccer Memebr

    Sep 21, 2006
    Perth
    Club:
    Perth Glory
    Nat'l Team:
    Australia
    Australia still very unlikely to get 2 & 2 since their top league only has 10 teams (and effectively 9 as Wellington is OFC and ineligible) - move all the other playoff allocations up one, and give Myanmar the other East playoff spot.
     
  16. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    Updated Rankings taking into account todays FIFA Rankings. These include World Cup and recent friendlies:

    upload_2014-7-17_12-54-26.png

    ACL slots give the information currently known:

    upload_2014-7-17_12-58-41.png

    * A UZB play-off spot moved to East to balance out allocation
    ** As AUS can only have 3 teams, their 4th play-off spot transferred to VIE
     
    jonny63 repped this.
  17. Nurafshon

    Nurafshon Member+

    Jun 28, 2007
    Germany
    Club:
    Liverpool FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Uzbekistan
    why it is always Uzbekistan? Is there any explanation behind this decision?
     
  18. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    Because when there has been an unbalance in the past, AFC as always moved an UZB team from west to east, presumably being the most eastern of the western countries.

    See wiki articles for the 2013 and 2012 editions and reference therein.
     
  19. edrees

    edrees Member

    Nov 28, 2005
    With the revamp, I would prefer to see AFC Champions League and AFC Cup be more inlined with UEFA coefficients.

    The top leagues will have more entrances in continental cups, and more exposure, and the little teams will geta chance to prove their talent against bigger, better teams..
     
  20. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    #20 fridge46, Jul 22, 2014
    Last edited: Jul 22, 2014
    AFC released their calendar for 2015 today (I have upload the file incase the link doesnt work). Some items of note regarding ACL:

    1) Last 16 will be played over 1 leg again, after being played home & away for the last 2 years;
    2) Final will also be played over 1 leg, again a change from the last 2 seasons;
    3) The play-offs will be played over 3 single legged rounds.

    EDIT: Apparently they have 2 calendars for 2015. One with singled legged Last 16 and Final, one with home & away Last 16 and Final.

    So with respect to point 3, I think it is safe to assume that the format for each zone will be:

    PO1: Teams ranked 9-16 enter
    PO2: Teams ranked 5-8 paired with PO1 winners
    PO3: Teams ranked 1-4 play against PO2 winners

    In 2014, teams were ranked in accordance to MA's ranking, then by final league position.

    If AFC apply the same rules in formulating the 2014 draw to this year, using the current rankings highlighted in post #16, the play off draw could look like:

    upload_2014-7-22_20-7-32.png

    I have seeded AFC Cup finalists last in each case, they could move up the seedings depending on the MA the finalists belong.

    Also, the AFC Cup will have 3 rounds of playoffs, which make sense as the champions of MA's ranked 33-47 (and potentially the runners up of those ranked 25-32) will send a team in addition to the final 6 teams of this years AFC Presidents Cup

    Does anyone have any information on the proposed format for AFC Cup?
     

    Attached Files:

    druryfire, mdhm and dinamo_zagreb repped this.
  21. fridge46

    fridge46 Member

    Oct 23, 2011
    "JDT, however, have to compete in the qualifying tournament in February. If they fail to make the tournament proper, they will compete in tournament proper of the second-tier AFC Cup.

    If that happens, FA Cup champions Pahang will have to play in the qualifying tournament in the AFC Cup. Previously, the Super League and FA Cup champions were given automatic slots in the AFC Cup’s tournament proper."

    The second paragraph makes no sense to me. What if JDT get knockout in the 3rd and final play off round.... how can Pahang play in the AFC Cup qualifiers?!
     
  22. pak_sakoorgtloh

    Jul 2, 2013
    Club:
    Eintracht Frankfurt
    Things will be decided in the AFC meeting on November I think. thus, all this format and speculation from the writer are not to be trust 100%
     
  23. mdhm

    mdhm Member

    Southern District FC
    Hong Kong
    Nov 7, 2010
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Hong Kong
    It means 1.5 slots for Malaysia League in AFC Cup.

    If JDT get knockout in ACL qualification, they will go to AFC Cup group stage directly. (1 slot)

    Also, Pahang will play in AFC Cup qualification (should be in final round).
    If they win, they will get another slot in AFC Cup group stage too. (0.5 slot)

    This should be same situation for the teams from Hong Kong, Singapore, India, Bahrain, Oman, Lebanon etc
     
  24. pak_sakoorgtloh

    Jul 2, 2013
    Club:
    Eintracht Frankfurt
    well last season it seems much more good for Malaysian league as they got 2 slots for the AFC Cup. Same as Indonesian league as well. I think if they got 0.5 for ACL & 2.0 slot for the AFC cup will be great. If not, only one club in AFC Cup from Malaysia or Indonesia if this being apply to them too
     

Share This Page