Well we'll all remember the 1966 WC Finals..... With Brazil not makingt it passed the group stage.... Portugal coming back to beat N. Korea 5 - 3...... and ofcourse England winning their first and only WC. But should England have won it? Portugal were the surprise team of the tournament and they had at the time the best player in the world, the dark stallion Eusebio. Down 3 - 0 against N.Korea, Eusebio scored 3 goals in a Portuguese rally to beat N. Korea 5 - 3. Now many say in the semi final Portugal was robbed. Reports that the queen made the arrangement with FIFA to keep the cup in England. You thoughts...
Well I guess my post really didn't explain that much. What I really asked was your thoughts on the tournament itself.
Anyways, they (Portugal) tryed with all their might to kill GOD(PELE), i saw a special on it the other day, the hacked and hacked him to death, as far as i'm concerned, that's what they get! NEVER MESS WITH GOD, see what happened to Portugal when they finally made it in 2002, he never forgets.
Eusebio scored 4 goals...............so says my dad......... My dad wittnesed the game(england-portugal) and said portugal was robbed...........a handball that was never called..........the takle in which a english defender brock the best portugeuse midfielders leg............that was never called.......Think it was simoes not shure..........
Like ruudboy said. What goes around comes around. sure Portugal had a wondeful team, but what they did in the group stage vs. Brazil was a disgrace. Would've been cool if N. Korea had beaten them though... an Asian team in the semis!!! And making England's path to the final that much easier, thus adding another twist to how they won the Cup!