333 seems whimsical. 476 and 172 seem stodgy.
Doubtful. You want to assume me no matter what I do or say. Such a sad way to go through life
What history exactly, Dave?
I'll agree that it's less than good and should only be reserved for the most extreme circumstances, those of which we are not even close to today.
I never brought up Lincoln and Booth, race baiter.
The most consequential man of the 20th century, Gavrilo Princip was a regular man
Adding nothing, as always.
Jefferson was always an influence over Madison. But if this one doesn't work, I think we can agree that Hamilton pulls enough weight. From...
Yeah. And? Not thinking that assassination is on the table as a check against tyranny is lacking in historical perspective
Sure it was "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants" -some dude
Everyone made money in the stock market from 1986 to 1988. It was a blow fueled joyride. Trump has been a public figure for 4 decades. This part...
Are we talking about this now?...
Another reason for the 2nd amendment. The ultimate check on the President.
It's hard to pass on an exact clone of Eli, though
720+ is not as weird for some reason. Maybe it's because of it's divisibility
In 20 years it will be 650+ AI bots
Babies for bags! #yanggang
It's super judgemental
Got it. Thanks
Which law exactly? I read that they were asked for but not that they were subpoenaed
500+ is a much better number. UGH!
Bingo. It's also lazy to assume that the 23 year old male holds all power over the 14 year old female. Its very possible that she's the one...
Since we are talking about NY State, marriage age is 17 flat. Up until 2 years ago it was 14 with court permission. But then divorce wasn't legal...
So no
Unimportant. Can I legally give my underage daughter permission to screw a 23-year-old?