You have google and the IFAB site, don’t you? Why is it my job to give you this? http://static-3eb8.kxcdn.com/files/document-category/062019/cWIXzZbCMwpODfK.pdf
The question was about the definition in the LOTG, not just what everybody knows, since there was a suggestion to card the captain. Who is that?
I just turned on the TV and have no idea what came before; but based on that goal that just got ruled offside, I think Cameron should walk off the pitch.
Two things on VAR. First, everyone wanted it. Everyone. And now they’ve got it and we’ve got teams and announcers having issues with decisions via VAR. Nothing was solved. It’s perhaps been made worse. Relative to that point, we shouldn’t gloss over how bad the missed red card in the fourth minute was. You can think of it as a lucky break. But in the global sense, every time a red like that is ignited via VAR, it makes it harder and harder when one is properly given. If VARs aren’t saying that’s a clear red, then what happens when one finally does? And how do refs justify giving it in real-time. The VAR world could create and sanction more violence.
I just rewound and watched it a fourth time. There was a player in an offside position that was no way involved in the play. The player that received the pass was on side. Every single commentator on two different channels agrees that VAR blew it.
I'm bewildered about the confusion on this. It's not even really close from a VAR perspective. We've seen the ones where the drawn lines are literally an inch apart. This wasn't the case.
CR pulled the captain aside (the one with the armband). Told her to restart and she went back to meeting with players. Clear DTR.
Ah yes, the commentators are never wrong If one foot is offside, you're offside. One foot was offside. It was close, but it was clear.
To paraphrase the Fox Sports commentator, " where are they getting those lines? Does she have a 2-foot left big toe?" She was standing physically adjacent to an England player that you can clearly see she was not that far in front of. We do still have eyes, right?
We're three years into VAR and this is still an issue? Her entire foot was offside. It was a pretty easy call for the VAR.
As could have been predicted by anyone who ever sat through a referee association meeting where they discussed videos of fouls.
My God. I’ve expressed some doubt about camera frame speed and the moment of the ball being played, but this wasn’t—relatively speaking—close at all. They have 3D rendering to get this right. You have your eyes. I’m going with them. VAR. Solving everything and eliminating controversy. Since never.
I am as serious as a suggestion that the referee should caution a player without being able to name who that player is.
So you agree with me now that the lines were wrong? Good. The answer to your question is "any". In the absence of the incorrect lines, I look at the screen and I don't see her clearly offside.