Revs Roster Thread, 2019 Season

Discussion in 'New England Revolution' started by patfan1, Mar 14, 2019.

  1. BrianLBI

    BrianLBI BigSoccer Supporter

    Sep 7, 2002
    New Hampshire
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    You may have not have intended to speak literally, but I do not think Kraft sees any cash flows from expansion. His share of the growing MLS pie is certainly on his balance sheet. But hey it's MLS, so I'm not going to claim to know exactly how it works!
     
    rkupp repped this.
  2. patfan1

    patfan1 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Aug 19, 1999
    Nashua, NH
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    35 year old...
     
  3. a517dogg

    a517dogg Member+

    Oct 30, 2005
    Rochester, NY
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Just as long as they don't spend any TAM/GAM money or a DP slot on him, he'd be a good addition. Certainly better than Empty Roster Spot #3.
     
  4. Crooked

    Crooked Member+

    May 1, 2005
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    I'm fairly certain that the other owners do receive a check each time an expansion fee gets paid to the league.
     
    Revolusean and BrianLBI repped this.
  5. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Well, it's complicated, since they get revenue as part of their SUM share. Still, in the grand scheme of things, splitting the pie into smaller pieces is the downside to whatever money they get from expansion fees.
     
    BrianLBI repped this.
  6. Argyle

    Argyle Member

    Jan 31, 2002
    Plymouth, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Somehow I don't see the Revs spending money on a 35-year-old midfielder.
     
  7. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    That does go against Brad's MO, but desperate times call for desperate measures...
     
  8. Mike Marshall

    Mike Marshall Member+

    Feb 16, 2000
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    a517dogg and Jon Martin repped this.
  9. Mike Marshall

    Mike Marshall Member+

    Feb 16, 2000
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    To add on to the previous post, this came from Sam Stejskel this week...







    So, Mpoku plays for Standard Liege, who is currently involved the "Championship Round" of the Belgian Pro League. Basically, you play a 30-game regular season, and at the end of the season, the top six teams play a 10-game round robin to crown a champion and runner-up, both of whom get a spot in the Champions League.

    Liege lost to Anderlecht this morning. Mpoku didn't play.

    If Club Brugge beats Gent this afternoon, Liege would be eliminated from finishing in a Champions League position, thus possibly freeing Mpoku to join the Revs prior to the May 7th deadline.
     
    a517dogg repped this.
  10. Mike Marshall

    Mike Marshall Member+

    Feb 16, 2000
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    FT: Club Brugge 1-0 Gent

    If I'm right, Standard Liege is no longer in contention for a spot in next season's Champions League. They have a few matches left to play, but their season is effectively over.

    If the 2nd DP is M'Poku, the path to bringing him to MLS before the deadline on Tuesday has seemingly been cleared.
     
  11. TOAzer

    TOAzer Member+

    The Man With No Club
    May 29, 2016
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Let's here assume it is M'Poku.....how to characterize what he offers? Clearly pegged as "promising" when young, now by age 27-28 he is a twice injured solid-enough journeyman. That suggests he is more talented than most Brad has brought in, and has enough flaws and question marks that he is desperate enough to be brought in by Brad...... If it is him, I wish the best for himself and the Revs... but I am deeply sceptical there will be any sustained improvement in how the team plays.
     
  12. Jon Martin

    Jon Martin Member+

    Apr 25, 2000
    SE Mass
    Looks decent.

    Though at this point, one wonders who many DP's we would need to get some momentum. Or whether it doesn't start with a new coach.
     
  13. rkane1226

    rkane1226 Member+

    Apr 9, 2000
    Club:
    Stade Brestois 29
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    As possible as this seems I just don’t see it happening by Tuesday.

    Even if it does one has to wonder how much impact it can have on this roster.
     
    Feldspar repped this.
  14. ToMhIlL

    ToMhIlL Member+

    Feb 18, 1999
    Boxborough, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I can't believe I'm quoting Ian Dury and the Blockheaads for the second time in a week, but this probably sums up the timing of our newest acquisition:
    Yes yes
    Dear dear
    Perhaps next year
    Or maybe even never


    And that's from the song "Reasons to be Cheerful (part 3)," which ironically enough, there is hardly any reason whatsoever to be cheerful with this team right now.
     
  15. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Charlie Adams was released at the same time. I'd rate him higher than Fletcher at this stage
     
  16. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    About 36 or so hours until the window closes, what are the chances the Revs move Fagundez or Pennilla to get a CB? Both seemed to be on the outs with Brad and if the new DP is a wing type player which is being suggested, these two could be dropping further down the depth chart.
     
  17. Mike Marshall

    Mike Marshall Member+

    Feb 16, 2000
    Woburn, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Jon Martin, MM66, VTSoccerFan and 3 others repped this.
  18. Feldspar

    Feldspar Member+

    Nov 19, 1998
    Boston, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If true, Burns should be docked every cent that we lost on the missed opportunity.
     
    Mike Marshall repped this.
  19. propnut27

    propnut27 Member

    Barcelona, Tottenham Hotspur
    Germany
    Mar 15, 2009
    Naples Fl.
    Club:
    --other--
    How does picking up a piece of lint off the Standard LIege bench in any way measurably improve this steaming pile of poop that currently soils the atmosphere at Gillette Stadium?
     
  20. rkane1226

    rkane1226 Member+

    Apr 9, 2000
    Club:
    Stade Brestois 29
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Unforgivable
     
  21. rkane1226

    rkane1226 Member+

    Apr 9, 2000
    Club:
    Stade Brestois 29
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Can someone please come up with verifiable and plausible reasons why they wouldn't ship Somi? At this point it just seems like Burns/Friedel intend to keep him from playing out of total spite.
     
    pwykes repped this.
  22. ftruscott

    ftruscott New Member

    New England Revolution
    United States
    Jul 6, 2018
    If I could get into their heads, I imagine they might come up with reasons like the below.

    1. They would rather pay full price for a player they won't use than partial price for a player they can't use.

    2. They are afraid he might perform well for another team exposing their incompetence at player selection and management.

    3. They are "competing" with FCC for a playoff spot and do not wish to strengthen an opponent.

    4. They feel they have to show the rest of the roster that even sucking and not being deemed useful is insufficient to escape the career hell in which they find themselves. It motivates the rest of the players.

    5. They want teams and agents to know what badass negotiators they are.
     
  23. rkane1226

    rkane1226 Member+

    Apr 9, 2000
    Club:
    Stade Brestois 29
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If true, 1, 2, and 4 are reasons why players shouldn’t sign with this team; 3 is delusional. Item 5 - I think most teams and agents have them pegged, they don’t need to worry.

    May 7 has arrived...
     
  24. firstshirt

    firstshirt Member+

    Bayern München
    United States
    Mar 1, 2000
    Ellington, CT / NK, RI
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Only thing I can think of is that the Revs would have lost money on the trade or possibly Cinncy wanted the Revs to pay some of the salary
     
  25. NFLPatriot

    NFLPatriot Member+

    Jun 25, 2002
    Foxboro, MA
    Club:
    New England Revolution
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    The answer is obvious. This would leave the Revs with another empty roster slot, and Burns can't even fill the ones he has now.
     
    tsb11, MM66, rkane1226 and 1 other person repped this.

Share This Page