Cristiano Ronaldo: How overrated is his post-2015 legacy ?? Video analysis and discussion thread.

Discussion in 'The Beautiful Game' started by leadleader, Mar 21, 2019.

?

Cristiano Ronaldo in his post-2015 form ??

  1. Most overrated of all time, probably.

    26.1%
  2. Extremely overrated, for sure.

    21.7%
  3. Overrated, but not overrated in any unprecedented sense.

    21.7%
  4. Not overrated at all.

    21.7%
  5. Not overrated at all, if anything, I think he might be underrated.

    8.7%
  1. leadleader

    leadleader Member+

    Aug 19, 2009
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    #26 leadleader, Mar 21, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 21, 2019
    I wanted to re-phrase and add a few things concerning the above display of completely unwarranted vitriol.

    1. I think you have quite grossly taken out of context what was a fairly simple and self-explanatory statement concerning Messi's 2017/18 superior goal count vs. Ronaldo 2007/08. At no point did I actually stated that scoring is exactly equal across two different leagues when said leagues were played in different periods or eras. What I implied was actually quite simple: 34 goals by a playmaker like Messi 2017/18 can reasonably be directly compared to the 31 goals by a winger like Ronaldo 2007/08, even if the values are not literally the exact same thing across different eras and different leagues.

    2. Luis Suarez has scored open-play La Liga goals at more or less the same rate that Ronaldo did, but of course, Suarez didn't needed to convert Benzema into a peasant-farmer in order to replicate what Ronaldo does in terms of open-play end product.

    3. Luis Suarez has also scored La Liga Clasico open-play goals at a better rate than Ronaldo.

    4. Luis Suarez scored 31 goals in the 2013/14 Premier League, the same number that Ronaldo registered in 2007/08, except for the fact that Suarez did not enjoyed the benefit of playing for a dominant Manchester United side, a Manchester united side that could and in fact did continue winning the Premier League even without Ronaldo's super powers. Which brings me to my next point: Suarez's highest scoring season in La Liga is 40 goals, playing for a far more star-studded Barcelona side... It should be rather simple to adjust for the fact that Liverpool was inferior when compared against Barcelona's attacking potential, and that as such, the 31 to 40 goal difference is actually definitely smaller - and probably significantly smaller - than the 9 goal difference that you get if you just assume that Liverpool and Barcelona are equal platforms for a goal scorer like Luis Suarez.

    5. Ronaldo's scoring in La Liga was, for the better part of his La Liga career, significantly inflated by Benzema's unprecedented peasantry; to the best of my knowledge never had a player of Benzema's quality been employed (and demoted) almost exclusively as a peasant whose primary or exclusive purpose was to inflate the numbers of Ronaldo to maximum capacity. Said inflation is not an honest representation of how easy it was for Ronaldo to score in La Liga versus how much more difficult it was for Ronaldo to score in the Premier League, and Ronaldo would have almost certainly scored at a significantly higher rate on average in the Premier League, had Ronaldo ever played for Real Madrid (aided by the peasant-in-chief extraordinaire Benzema) but in the Premier League instead of La Liga.

    6. Fernando Torres suffered no drop in his goal scoring form when moving from La Liga to the Premier League... Torres scored 16 goals in La Liga 2004/05, 13 goals in La Liga 2005/06, 14 goals in La Liga 2006/07, and then immediately jumped to 24 goals in the Premier League 2007/08, and again another 14 goals (what was more or less his average in La Liga) in the Premier League 2008/09, and another 18 goals (above his La Liga average) in the Premier League 2009/10. What exactly was so difficult about the Premier League 2007/08 that you would credit Ronaldo's 31 goals much more highly than Messi's 34 goals in La Liga 2017/18??

    Fernando Torres had absolutely no problem adapting from La Liga to the Premier League, his statistics display the obvious and then there's Torres himself who didn't have a high opinion of the defenders of the Premier League.

    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/f...alkeepers-and-defenders-are-poor-quality.html

    "In England, the keepers usually come out too soon and try to go one on one with you.

    "The only exceptions are Edwin van der Sar and Petr Cech, who hold and hold and try to keep themselves big as you close in on them.

    "That's why, against Manchester United and Chelsea, I try to hit the ball early.

    "The rest of the Premier League keepers tend to come out at you and throw themselves down at the ball too quickly.

    "In general, that's the reason so many goals are scored when a striker dribbles down the right or left and the keeper goes down at his feet. But if you anticipate what's coming, it's easier to score.

    "The central defenders are usually big, strong, aggressive lads. I guess it is probably because of these characteristics that the majority think they can solve problems by getting tough with me.

    "But the truth is most of them lack defensive positioning as a result of their reliance on strength and aggression and so leave so much space for you to take advantage of."

    7. Can you provide a solid argument that a playmaker (not a striker) like Messi scoring 34 goals in the 2014 - 2018 La Liga has significantly less statistical significance historically or else versus Ronaldo scoring 31 goals in the 2005 - 2009 Premier League?? Do you have a clear-cut convincing argument other than simply ignoring how Ronaldo (assisted unprecedented peasantry) was scoring as many goals as Messi??

    8. Messi - the playmaker - scoring 34 goals in an era of La Liga where Suarez's highest measure is 40, is extremely impressive regardless of who you compare it against. Messi scored 34 goals, scored a ton of assists, scored a ton of pre-assists, arguably single-handedly won La Liga for Barcelona, and Barcelona was a dysfunctional side. Logical questions arise: Is Ronaldo - at any point in his Real Madrid career - even capable of scoring 34 goals himself without inevitably disrupting the tactical flexibility that would have (in better circumstances) allowed Luis Suarez to produce similar open-play numbers to the ones Ronaldo is expected to deliver??

    Ronaldo arguably if not certainly needs the peasantry of a Benzema or a Mandzukic doing his best impression of Benzema, which would explain his drought in terms of La Liga titles after having won only 2 out of his 9 La Liga campaigns. If you are Ronaldo, how do you win league titles when Messi can routinely replicate the same or even better open-play end product that you offer, but without necessarily putting a strict limit on the goal scoring capabilities of all the other forwards not named Messi (which is an ability that you cannot realistically offer)??
     
  2. DazerII

    DazerII Member

    May 27, 2011
    Ohh boy, we are back at this nonsense again, to make it worst this is after seemingly impossible comeback against arguably the best defensive team in Europe, Atletico!!! Funny enough on the 12th I spoke to the other guy at Atleti store (Gran Via) and he was so sceptical because of one particular guy...as you know it happened. Ironically people in Barcelona as well (of course those I interacted with respect the guy), maybe because they want to appear neutral, I don't know.

    Anyway I feel any discussion that even suggests that a player who has helped his team to three consecutive CL titles while being a best player in each of those seasons (this is not up to discussion btw) is overrated is insane. To back up his claim he individually pushed his team to what I consider one of the greatest come backs in CL history (my opinion of course) with a different team that clearly lacks creativity and is not as attacking minded like the likes of Madrid/Barca/even PSG. Anyone who watches Serie A games and is objective will attest to this, Juve games are probably the most frustrating games on TV.
     
    carlito86 repped this.
  3. Bavarian14

    Bavarian14 Member

    Bayern München
    Jun 1, 2017
    #28 Bavarian14, Mar 23, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2019
    A straight 8 for defensive contribution of a forward. It doesn't get any better from a Real Madrid fanpage :ROFLMAO:
    Did Messi get half of those chances against Roma that Ronaldo got against Bayern or Liverpool?

    You forgot to mention that Messi destroyed the same Juventus in Group Stage

    Again you are convoluting the fact that league form has little to no relevance with UCL. Real Madrid finished 3rd in the La Liga last season but they won the Champions League.
     
  4. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    #29 carlito86, Mar 23, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2019
    I know it can be easy and tempting to cherrypick quotations from players to build your narrative around
    You picked the worst example possible(for your case at least)

    Seeing as Fernando Torres is now the ultimate authority on EPL players during the relevant time period let’s take a look what he said when Cristiano Ronaldo beat him to all individual awards in England(Europe and the world)during 2007/08

    “No-one can rival him," the Spaniard told France Football. "He is in a class of his own. I have never seen a comparable player."
    For me he is the best player in the world," Torres explained. "A machine. Incomparable."

    https://www.goal.com/en/news/1713/liverpool/2008/11/24/980237/liverpools-torres-ronaldo-is-a-machine

    His 2007/08 campaign was one of and still remains one of the most dominant individual campaigns in the history of football


    La Liga isn’t and never has been as great defensively as the PL 2006-2010
    La Liga teams have never dominated the champions league latter stages(particularly in the SFs and finals) as English teams did during that era
    I know you are a fan of objectivity and myth busting but this a fact for you to get your head around

    Another thing which I didn’t want to address because the point is so stupid to begin with
    (Regarding Suarez scoring more La Liga el Classico goals or whatever)
    Obviously this is part and parcel of your misinformation campaign so lets set the record straight

    Not every goal scored in el Classico is equal
    Suarez didnt score his el Classico goals against a team that averaged 65-75% possession
    Ronaldo didn’t score his goals against a Barcelona languishing in 10th place with a disastrous defensive record(as Suarez did this season)
    You are as per usual disingenuous omitting important details that would(and have) completely derailed your narrative

    Barcelona won the league with 100 points in 12/13
    15 points ahead of Real Madrid
    Ronaldo scored 6 goals in a single season against this team
    Are you really saying a rebound/tapin hattrick by Suarez against Real Madrid in 10th place is equal to 6 goals by Ronaldo against a team that won the league with 100 points

    No doubt you will say
    What about Thomas muller
    What about this/that/whoever could also score Multiple goals against Barcelona 12/13
    Thomas muller was a proven scorer in big games
    Check his record in the World Cup,the CL ko stages pre 2015,Bundesliga
    There was no doubt about his quality and knack for finding himself in goalscoring positions against any opponent he faced
    Even if Suarez is a greater technical player he does not have the record of Tmuller in important games

    He never had it in Liverpool
    Never in the champions(QF-final) except 1 rebound tapin against Buffon in 2015
    Never decided a copa Del Rey final.
    In big games against big club opponents he is not in the same league as Thomas muller(matter of fact he is also worse than fillipo inzaghi)

    There is no difference between the 13/14 Suarez who choked in every big game he played and the one for Barcelona
    Except in Barcelona he had higher quality playmakers and could as a consequence make the difference in some rare games
    As in the 14/15 el Classico
    Or the rebound tapin against juventus

    I’m sure you would also argue Gareth bales copa Del Rey winner against Barcelona 2014 was equal to CRs against 10/11 Barcelona (which was in your own opinion the greatest team of all time)
    While 13/14 Barcelona very arguably wasn’t even a top 5 team of the season
    Real Madrid hadn’t won the copa Del Rey in like 20 years before 2011
    The significance of that trophy can’t be overstated enough in how it loosened the grip on Barcelona’s dominance in Spain and gave way to a golden era at Real Madrid
     
  5. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    The source being managingmadrid webiste ? C'mon man. Those ratings are ludicrous. I mean the "8" rating first comment is "Didn’t get on the score sheet, despite having a number of chances to do so" ... so a forward wastes scoring opportunities and gets an 8 ? Sheesh ...

    You don't need this to make your point.
     
  6. leadleader

    leadleader Member+

    Aug 19, 2009
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    That irony - IRONY - is just completely lost on Benficafan3, I'm afraid. Said poster repeatedly choces to ignore the fact that Ronaldo's actual defensive contribution as a forward/striker is relatively average, really nothing special at all, which means that what Ronaldo excels at in terms of work-rate is in terms of making himself a target for passes, not in terms of actually doing a lot of defending off-the-ball.

    In other words, if Ronaldo not only doesn't score any goals, but actually makes a mess out of clear-cut chances - as was demonstrably the case in both legs vs. Bayern Munich - then it is absolutely ludicrous to give Ronaldo an 8 out of 10 rating on the basis of Ronaldo failing at the only thing that his off-the-ball activity actually creates.

    I mean, if Ronaldo had Didier Drogba's defensive ability, maybe he might deserve a 7 out of 10 even in a game where he makes a mess out of easy chances, but the fact is that Ronaldo's defensive contribution is nothing special and has never been anything special, and the fact also remains that even for Drogba the highest possible rating for such a performance would be a 7 out of 10, not an 8 out of 10.

    At any rate, the fact that Ronaldo gets a mandatory 8 out of 10 just because he apparently "did everything but score" (he did not do everything but score vs. Bayern), actually further demonstrates my point that he is overrated to such an unprecedented extent that even when he's plainly and unequivocally mediocre, people like Benficafan3 will still find some hilarious way of rationalizing a world class 8 out of 10 performance, etc. I honestly cannot find any precedent for this type of veneration.
     
  7. leadleader

    leadleader Member+

    Aug 19, 2009
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    #32 leadleader, Mar 23, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 23, 2019
    I don't understand what it is that you think you have demonstrated or proven with the above??

    I mean, how is it that you fail to understand the fact that you are completely contradicting yourself??

    Your argument:

    "Ronaldo's 2007/08 campaign was one of and still remains one of the most dominant individual campaigns in the history of football."

    My argument:

    Messi's 2017/18 La Liga campaign also was one of the all time great league performances, and unlike Ronaldo 2007/08, Messi actually directly outclassed Ronaldo in La Liga, and Messi not only directly outclassed Ronaldo in La Liga but Messi ALSO dominated La Liga in a period in which La Liga dominated the Champions League: Real Madrid 2014 (Atletico Madrid 2014 also in the Final), Barcelona 2015, Real Madrid 2016 (Atletico Madrid 2016 again in the Final), Real Madrid 2017, and Real Madrid 2018.

    The Champions League had never before been dominated so thoroughly by just one league; Messi DOMINATED the league that dominated the Champions League; Messi DOMINATED the league where the great Cristiano Ronaldo also played in...

    What part of the above do you fail to understand??

    In addition to the above, Ronaldo 2007/08 did not have any serious competition in the Premier League...

    1. Chelsea 2007/08 was distinctly erratic and uninspiring in the league, which is precisely why Jose Mourinho was fired mid-season.

    2. Liverpool 2007/08 lurked in 4th place with only 76 points.

    3. Arsenal 2007/08 while competitive was not a serious candidate in any sense of the word - Barcelona and Bayern Munich routinely dispatched Arsenal in the Champions League in the years to come. The truth is, Arsenal lost something in 2004/05, and Arsenal never truly recovered from whatever it was that they lost in 2004/05. Furthermore, Eduardo's career-ending injury in 2007/08 (was it?) also further facilitated Manchester United's easy road.

    Ronaldo was playing on the best team in the Premier League, with Chelsea in their worst shape ever under Jose Mourinho, with Liverpool in their worst shape in recent years, with Arsenal in their worst shape in recent years (especially after Eduardo's horrific career-altering injury), etc. Ronaldo did not played against the truly great versions of Jose Mourinho's Chelsea, and Arsenal declined heavily, and Liverpool just wasn't a serious candidate (especially after age finally caught up with Sami Hyypia, who had been absolutely crucial to Liverpool's impressive defensive game throughout the 2004/05 Champions League and the 2005/06 Premier League), etc. In conclusion: Manchester United continued winning the Premier League even after Ronaldo's departure, more than anything else because Chelsea and Arsenal had both declined.

    How can you compare Ronaldo's non-competition in the Premier League 2007/08, with Messi 2017/18 directly outclassing Ronaldo during Real Madrid's Zidane Era??

    I am indeed a fan of objectivity, which is why I find it hilarious that you think that La Liga has not dominated the Champions League latter stages the way that English clubs did... WTF are you smoking??

    Barcelona 2014 - 2016 was eliminated ONLY by Atletico Madrid.

    Real Madrid and Atletico Madrid played two Finals; 2014 and 2016.

    Real Madrid played 4 Finals; 2014, 2016, 2017, and 2018.

    Barcelona played 1 Final; 2015.

    When did English clubs ever dominated the Champions League latter stages in such a way??
     
  8. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    In the Bayern tie I think he messed up 1 or 2 clear chances. It wasn't many. But yeah, considering the source website of the rating , it's ludicrous to take it seriously. He was probably impressed Ronaldo came back a few times and stole a ball.

    With regards to Ronaldo overall, the narrative that is definitely over the top is for example this one that he put Juve over the top vs "the best defensive team in Spain".

    Now, starting with Juve pre-Ronaldo. In the past half decade Juve have knocked out Barca from the CL. They have knocked Madrid from the CL (with Ronaldo). They made 2 CL finals. Morata scored goals vs Madrid and Barca mind you. They also beat Madrid last season (with Ronaldo) 3 x 1 at the Bernabeu and came within a min of sending the game to ET. Ironically enough Mandjukic had 2 headers as you stated but I wouldn't say they were harder than Ronaldo's. So the narrative of Ronaldo "taking Juve to the next level" is a bit BS as Juve have shown recently to be a team of knocking top teams out of the CL so why not Atletico without Ronaldo ?

    Atletico's defense for that matter conceded 3 goals to Madrid (without Ronaldo) this season. Yes they have a good GA record in La Liga, but let's not exaggerate things as them being an iron curtain. Not to mention they were missing both their starting FBs.

    Having said that, Ronaldo's headers were definitely high quality. I have ragged on some of his goals in that crazy stretch of goals he had 2 years ago, but these headers were really good. Not to say another player couldn't have performed them. And also the service was great. Good cross AND great header can be true at the same time.

    And I feel that's one of Ronaldo's main advantage over Messi. Obviously the header which has bailed his team out a few times. But also he has been able to transition easily playing ore as a striker instead of a winger. His anticipation in the box is very good. And that's impressive. He has a physical advantage over Messi who has to most of the time use his brain to break down teams rather than a physical attribute. Specially as his dribbling has gotten less effective.
     
    Bavarian14 and leadleader repped this.
  9. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    That's a strange statement given Spanish teams won the CL the last 5 years in a row and Atletico made 2 finals (with all spanish finals). Only reason they probably didn't have 3 teams in SFs is because Atletico met Barca twice in QFs. The only thing that period of English dominance had over Spain's is that they had 4 teams instead of 3 that actually had a shot at winning it all.
     
  10. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    This is really terrible revisionism and the first time I’ve heard all of these theories
    Ronaldo did not play against strong Chelsea sides or strong Arsenal sides LMFAO
    What are you babbling about?
    Ronaldo put on a MOTM performance against the invincibles arsenal in 2004/05 FA cup final

    In the very same season he scored 2 goals at Highbury to beat Arsenal in a thrilling 4-2 encounter
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/2354689/Ronaldos-double-sinks-Arsenal.html
    He did this at 19 years old

    Ronaldo played a Chelsea side that was so dysfunctional and distinctly average that they could still make a champions league final(with Jose mourinho being sacked mid season) and only lost to Manchester United via a penalty shootout.



    Messi did dominate the league that dominated the champions league but he did not dominate the champions league so once again your point is obsolete
    Ronaldo was over a 3 season stretch (2007-2009) the best champions league player
    in 2006/07 he propelled his team to a SF finish with 3 goals+5 assists+3 per assists
    He did this playing from a deeper position than Kaka who was really a SS and not a AM any more after shevchenco left
    http://forum.football.co.uk/showthread.php?31382-Kaka-attacking-midfielder-or-striker
    In 2005 he was a AM behind sheva and inzaghi
    5A0E3374-B9EE-4A2F-810D-7483F7CD0A79.png


    In 2007/08 ronaldo was the best CL player
    In 2008/09 he was either the second or third best behind Messi/Xavi and the best player in the champions league KO stages


    During the Zidane era 2016-
    Messi was outclassed by probably 10 different players in the champions league
    Including Cristiano Ronaldo 16-18
    Roberto firmino 17/18
    Mane 17/18
    Salah 17/18
    Neymar 16-18
    Isco 16-17
    Marcelo 17-18
    Casimero 16/17
    Modric 17/18
    Modric 15/16
    Harry Kane 17/18
    Could be more but then I’d be delving into subjective territory

    Your new founded love for Liverpool is absurdly hilarious
    Liverpool declined from what exactly?
    In 2004/05 the amazing Liverpool finished 5th place in the PL in a year according to yourself:
    Arsenal were so distinctly average And for your info so were Manchester United who were knocked out the CL Groupstage by benfica

    Liverpool were thoroughly dispatched by Milan in the 2005 CL final first half
    It wasn’t even a competition but just 1 way traffic
    Liverpool came back into the tie through luck and a penalty(your not very fond of those goals at least from what I remember)


    CRonaldo was the best player in the best league in the world football
    And he was for the best part of 3 seasons
    No amount of revisionism will change this fact
     
  11. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Nice try with the Kaká comment . Look at his goals and tell me it was because he benefitted playing close to the goal . No gimmes in his 6 open field goals.
     
  12. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    Please tell me which strong teams he scored his CL goals against
    Bearing in mind Liverpool is no longer a strong defensive team post 04/05(at least according to factleader)

    I never called Kaka a CF(as inzaghi) but he was not pulling strings creatively as he had been doing in the 2004/05 CL campaign for example(and even 2003/04 which was most likely kaka at his best)


    There is no such a thing as a legendary CL run when 6 of your 10 CL goals come against Aek Athens
    ,anderlecht and Celtic

    CR doesn’t get away with this even in his worst season
     
  13. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    The quality of the goals is non-debatable . None were dished on a platter . Not to mention 3 vs ManU. Those goals were harder than many or most of the goals Ronaldo scored vs so called big teams.
     
  14. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    #39 carlito86, Mar 24, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2019
    False on two counts


    Also say it how it is:
    Kaka scored his goals against a defensive pairing of Wes brown and Gabriel Heinze
    Not Ferdinand And vidic who were both injured
    DA2DB70B-8701-40E2-B3EC-C5A9CB2BA152.jpeg
     
  15. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Still very high skilled individual goals. Specially important because Milan were not a dominating side that season.

    Guess I can also say last season for example, every team Madrid beat were missing major players for at least 1 leg. Neymar, Dybala, Robben, and Salah in the Final.
     
  16. benficafan3

    benficafan3 Member+

    Nov 16, 2005
    It was literally the first thing that came up on Google. Not worth putting any further effort in for such a low-effort thread. Literally take a look at what @leadleader writes for each of Ronaldo's Champions League campaigns. He dislikes Ronaldo. It's extremely obvious.

    For Ronaldo's 2016/2017 season when he destroyed Atletico, Bayern and Juventus, he writes that the ref was Real's best player and that Ronaldo had a lucky/deflected goal in the final. Does he mention anything else? Like scoring a brace at Bayern? A hat trick against Atletico? A non-deflected goal against Juventus (as if the deflected goal is of lesser value anyway loll) ? No, of course not. That's his summary of the entire campaign for Ronaldo. It's horseshit and you give him credence and credibility which he eats up and reps to build his deluded sense of opinion.

    You think he'd ever write that one of Messi's CL triumphs came at the hands of Ovrebo? Absolutely not. I've wasted more than enough time on this guy over the years. And this thread has moved into Bada Bing levels of delusion.

    You literally just need to read what he wrote for Ronaldo's entire CL campaign, year by year, to see that this is not a person who is looking to have an objective discussion. He actually states as much as when he says he has no information regarding 2007/2008 but is sure it was overrated. lol okay. Definitely a person seeking objectivity. It's actually someone who already has a very subjective view of the player in his head. He's always a good laugh though, I'll give him that.
     
    carlito86 repped this.
  17. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    We are talking about missing defenders against a fast counter attacking side as Milan 04-07 who could and did expose slow ass players as Heinze and Wes brown
    I don’t recall ronaldo scoring any of his goals when Atlético were missing godin,juventus missing chellini,Barcelona missing pique,alvez,Bayern missing boetang/hummels
    Defensively they were always fully manned and described on many occasions as “impenetrable”
     
  18. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Kaka was the counter-attack.

    Great teams are not necessarily harder to score against. Not when the team you play on, are the same quality or better than they are. Good CBs are as good as the protection the rest of the team gives them based tactics. Tell me why, Madrid having two World Class CBs in Ramos and Varane, concede so damn much ? It's because they are often left exposed. It can be harder to score against a medium strength team that parks the bus than a higher quality team that comes out to play more attacking football leaving spaces to be exploited.

    The hat-trick vs Bayern BTW ... overrated. 2 goals one of which was off-sides and trapped with his arm and the while the last one, ignoring the slightly offsides position, a tap-in in garbage time.
     
  19. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    A hattrick against Bayern in a champions QF can never be overrated(overhyped maybe)
    Even if he scored all 5 goals with his chin(or thigh)

    There is also no such as a thing as scoring in garbage time when you are the scorer of all 5 of your teams goals
     
  20. Danko

    Danko Member+

    Barcelona
    Serbia
    Mar 15, 2018
    I think the last 3 years, CR is basically a Van Basten or Gerd Muller. Dominates the hell inside the penalty box but isn't contributing much in terms of playmaking, building up play, as a dribbling threat etc. Comparing him to Drogba though is really harsh because he is not just better but way way more consistent. No one in this era other than Messi has been as dominant as CR. That's a fact.

    I find CR a bit overrated when fanboys come out and suddenly call him GOAT. I mean he himself was a better player circa 2012 then he is now and (almost) nobody mentioned him as a GOAT back then. But in another sense, he isn't overrated because he does what his job is really really well.

    I've never cared about accomplishments that much. Messi could win the CL the next 5 years and most people would say he is definitely the GOAT. To me personally he is already the GOAT by now or he never will be. Sure longevity can help your case a bit but you are either a GOAT caliber player or you aren't. No amount of CL titles will suddenly convince me either way. Likewise for Ronaldo last 3 years have validated his career but if you had him #20 all time 3 years ago and now you have him at #4 you should rethink your way of judging players. Sure we can just judge based purely on accomplishments but what debate is there then? Anyone can count titles...

    Or we can determine the GOAT in terms of accomplishments and debate the best player of all time (BOAT) separately. Which is how I try to spin things sometimes. And to me who is BOAT is more relevant than who is GOAT. Being GOAT requires great teammates, weaker opponents, being healthy, and luck on your side.
     
    Bavarian14 and carlito86 repped this.
  21. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    #46 carlito86, Mar 24, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2019
    The “BOAT” is strictly determined by skillset(what you can and cannot do with the ball
    Which categories you excel in and those you lack in)

    The GOAT is determined by
    Consistency
    Titles
    Skillset

    And other qualities as leadership,good gamesmanship etc


    If CR wins the CL as the main star with juventus he will be a greater historical legend than Lionel Messi(for now because we don’t know how Messis career will end)

    Messi will still be better(more complete in skillset) but not greater
    This is why Michel platini with a inferior skillset to zico is considered a greater historical legend(Euro 84-essentially a handful of games)

    The same for Van Basten and Thierry Henry
    the french man arguably wasn’t inferior at his peak (especially at league level) however he lacked some defining moments for his legacy (in major tournament)

    Same for Gerd Muller who was limited in skillset compared to Romario but ranked historically higher for higher contribution to major titles+big goals that Romario did not have(especially in the WC +EC)

    It just isn’t the case that no matter what CR does or wins he can’t surpass Messi.
    Major titles won by players who pull of iconic performances have always swung the pendulum in GOAT player discussions
     
    Danko repped this.
  22. celito

    celito Moderator
    Staff Member

    Palmeiras
    Brazil
    Feb 28, 2005
    USA
    Club:
    Palmeiras Sao Paulo
    Nat'l Team:
    Brazil
    Overrated / overhyped ... whichever.
     
  23. carlito86

    carlito86 Member+

    Jan 11, 2016
    Club:
    Real Madrid
    #48 carlito86, Mar 24, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2019
    Nope


    Overhyped if I was to say ronaldos hattrick vs Bayern was better than R9 or Rivaldo vs Valencia only because CL>league and Bayern>Valencia WITHOUT factoring the technical difficulty of R9(and particularly Rivaldos)hattrick

    On the other hand a hattrick against Bayern in a CL QF can never be overrated because it’s not like any Johnny nobody could do the same thing
    It doesn’t even matter what types of goals they were
    like I said even if he scored a hattrick of penalties(or with his shin)it’s still a landmark goalscoring performance against a heavyweight(and in a big match)

    If you can’t appreciate that I’m sorry celito but that’s your problem not mine
     
  24. schwuppe

    schwuppe Member+

    Sep 17, 2009
    Club:
    FC Kryvbas Kryvyi Rih
    Sure, Ronaldo had quite a few things going his way, but he still had some outstanding showings in the CL while having some of the hardest draws possible.

    However I've seen a (rare) subset of his fanbase that wants to push the story that CR somehow had a special Euro in 2016 carrying his nation to a trophy - that's some MASSIVE overrating of his contribution. He was useful in 2 out of 6 games against Hungary/Wales (his "heroic" comeback against Hungary was only necessary, because he was godawful in the first 2 games missing countless chances and a penalty) who aren't exactly world-beaters and missed the most important game against the strongest team.

    The likes of Henrik Larsen and Angelos Charisteas had more legendary Euro contributions. Just because it's better than what Messi did on an NT level (which is highly questionable) doesn't mean it's historically relevant for an all time great contender.
     
    leadleader repped this.
  25. leadleader

    leadleader Member+

    Aug 19, 2009
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    #50 leadleader, Mar 24, 2019
    Last edited: Mar 24, 2019
    Arsenal 2004/05 was not "the invincibles" as you are conveniently and rather desperately trying to argue here... Arsenal 2004/05 finished 12 points behind one of the strongest Chelsea sides ever, the point being the fact that it is virtually impossible to not win the league by a MASSIVE difference of 12 points when you are invincible??

    The facts are crystal clear:

    Arsenal 2004/05 suffered defeats vs. Manchester United (Premier League), vs. Liverpool (Premier League), vs. Bolton Wanderers (Premier League), vs. Manchester United again (Premier League), and vs. Birmingham City (Premier League). In other words, Ronaldo had a MOTM performance against a declined version of Arsenal, and Arsenal 2004/05 was in fact the beginning of the end of the Arsene Wenger's Arsenal.

    At the same time, Ronaldo had a very strong Chelsea 2004/05 side to compete against, but again, Ronaldo 2004/05 was fairly average vs. Chelsea, Manchester United was defeated in both their league games vs. Chelsea. For example, Spain's magical dribbler Joaquin Sanchez had much better performances vs. Chelsea 2005/06 and vs. Liverpool 2005/06, compared to what Ronaldo did (against those same clubs) at any point between the 2004/05 season and the 2005/06 season. Another example would be Messi vs. Chelsea 2005/06 who played at a much higher level than anything Ronaldo did vs. Chelsea 2005/06 or Chelsea 2004/05. Furthermore, Ronaldo 2004/05 was also a non-factor in the Champions League Round of 16 vs. AC Milan.

    Basically Ronaldo was only good or great against declining 'big teams' like Arsenal, a club that declined heavily after season 2003/04, a club that further declined after Patrick Vieira's departure, and also a club that continued its long term and seemingly permanent decline in the years to come. At any rate, Ronaldo 2004/05 being MOTM against Arsenal 2004/05 in one specific important game doesn't really tell me much of anything other than the fact that Ronaldo is impressive vs. previously great clubs that are no longer great when Ronaldo is great against them, the greatest example of that being Atletico Madrid, Ronaldo vs. Ateltico Madrid 2016 - 2019 is much better than Ronaldo vs. Atletico Madrid 2013 -2016, almost purely because Atletico Madrid 2016 - 2019 itself was not a patch on their earlier version.

    Cristiano Ronaldo simply doesn't stand out as anything truly special at any point prior to his 2006/07 season, when he began to play at a higher level. Thierry Henry was rated higher in 2004/05. Frank Lampard was rated higher in 2004/05. Wayne Rooney was probably not rated as an inferior talent to Cristiano Ronaldo 2004/05.

    Ronaldo 2007/08 did not played against a strong Chelsea nor against a strong Arsenal. That's just a fact, and not revisionism at all. Jose Mourinho was in fact fired mid-season due to how mediocre and unconvincing Chelsea was. Arsenal became a shell of itself after the Eduardo injury. Manchester United was the best team in England, which is precisely why Manchester United continued winning league titles well after Ronaldo's departure. In other words: Ronaldo 2007/08 definitely and unequivocally benefited from playing in a league where he had no rivals.

    Furthermore, Jose Mourinho was loved by Chelsea, he won 2 league titles in his first 2 seasons with the club (Chelsea had not won a league title in 50+ years), but Chelsea 2007/08 was so thoroughly unconvincing that Chelsea had to find a new coach. Think about how bad Chelsea 2007/08 had to be, that they had to get rid of the title-winning coach but also the celebrated 'special one' personality that was Jose Mourinho at the time??
     

Share This Page