Trump's Presidency IV: Stupefaction Jackson

It's not a question of me not wanting to continue, its your fellow believers that want it to stop.

I'm more than game to continue but I bet the others following the thread will not enjoy it.

 

Says the guy that cannot be moved by any evidence...

 

You've got that right. We've been hearing your whining about Hillary for nearly 2 years.
I'm guessing that you don't like her.

 

On other fake news..

https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...5875b7d1876_story.html?utm_term=.5f057ca709ec



There are secondary headlines on the Trump cover that tout stories on President Barack Obama, climate change and the financial crisis. Two of those are taken from a real March 2, 2009, issue of Time, which featured actress Kate Winslet on the cover. But the issue makes no mention of Trump.

Another possible clue to the fake cover’s origins: The fake bar code on the bottom right. An identical bar code shows up online in a graphic-design tutorial posted in 2010, in which a Peruvian designer laid out how to make a fake Time cover — complete with this bar code, for extra realism. The graphic designer did not immediately respond to questions from The Post.

/quote

 

Anybody seen this. You just can't 'make it up' But Trump certainly can

Time magazine has asked the Trump Organization to remove copies of a fake cover of President Trump that were on display at the company’s golf clubs, The Washington Post reported Tuesday afternoon.

The request came after the newspaper reported that at least four Trump-branded golf clubs had displayed a fake Time magazine cover that depicted Trump with the headline “Donald Trump: The ‘Apprentice’ is a television smash!”

The cover, dated March 1, 2009, was never published by the magazine at any point, a spokeswoman for Time confirmed.

 

You cheated. I had it first.

 

You are gonna have to be more pacific.* There is so much going on here.

(j/k pet peeve of mine, when people say pacific instead of specific)

 

Why? What the hell difference does it make to his wife's credentials if Anthony Weiner (or Carlos Danger for that matter) cheated on his wife and sent dick pics?

You know who should vet employees a little better???
Donald Trump!

 

I grew up with the evangelical beliefs about the antiChrist and the end times. It's all ridiculous, I know. But by Zeus, Trump is such a picture-perfect example of the evangelical antiChrist. It almost makes me want to reconsider throwing that religion down the "long drop" (aka outhouse) where it belongs.

 

It's ok if Trump appoints foreign agents into the highest position of National Security Advisor because Hillary!

I have many witnesses who can confess that in February of 2016 I was predicting Trump would become president. I knew Hillary would be the Democratic nominee and that she had 0% chance of winning. Regardless of how she ran her campaign, she was too hated by the religious right. There was no way in hell should we win. And while she got millions of more votes, she didn't win (contrary to what President Idiot says, the electoral college is highly biased in favor of Republicans - it's much harder for Democrats to win than Republicans).

 

But what about the 2 Corinthians.

 

Revised history? You know very well the reason she lost is because she stole all those top secret emails that ended up causing loss of life at BENGHAZI! This was all explained by someone in the know for many pages not long ago!

You have the memory of a moth!

 

And yet they still overwhelmingly supported him.

 

Yes, that "Top advisor" to Trump has a wife who is a total bitch. She is probably going to jail due to some shady dealings involved with Chinese trademarks and conditions at the factory making her crap.

Also, Trump's top "unpaid advisor" has a husband who just lawyered up bigly. Primarily due to things that happened prior to Trump assuming the mantle. And some awfully shady deals involving a $238,000,000 loan with the Russian money laundering bank of choice.

He should have vetted those slimy f*ckers much more closely.

Also, I would like to remind you that Clinton did not "hire someone for a top advisor to the President position" as Clinton was not and is not President.

Plus your argument, as it relates to Anthony Weiner, is nonsense.

Weiner was not convicted of a felony when he stepped down from Congress.
Weiner was not convicted of a felony when his wife was hired by Clinton.
Weiner was not convicted of a felony when the election occurred.

He pled guilty on May 18, 2017.
His wife filed for divorce about the same time.


By the way, Anthony Weiner is a vile, disgusting and very troubled human being.
He absolutely should not have done what he did.
It is too bad, as he was a pretty tough Congressman in his day.

 

Well...I certainly wouldn't want to pee[ve] you off so I'll just say I went from living close to the Atlantic Ocean to a mile away from the Specific.

 

When did you adopt Greek polytheism?

 

Almost a decade ago I decided it was more realistic than Christian monotheism - but that's a pretty low bar. (But I'm really an atheist now - I just like the Greek gods for their realism).

Not to mention the Greek gods were quite ok with gays!

 

I think i made a magazine cover at Hershey Park when I was a kid.

 

Ill just respond to you but it applies to the others, too.

When did I say anything about Trump? How, exactly, do you get from criticism of Clinton being defense of Trump?

Deflection?

 

It looks to me like someone (or multiple someones) way, way too easily allowed someone else to rile them the hell up.

 

Trump tower Toronto to dump Trump.

Toronto’s Trump International Hotel and Tower will soon no longer bear the Trump name, a change experts say is likely the result of the U.S. president alienating customers who disagree with his politics.

JCF Capital, the new owner of the hotel and condominium tower, said Tuesday that it has reached an agreement with a unit of the Trump Organization to buy out management contracts for the property for an undisclosed
amount.

 

I didn't, other than you specifically stated when hiring an Advisor to the President and, well, Clinton ain't President, and the orange ignoramus is in the White House.

This is not deflection at all. It is pointing a major fallacy in your argument.