CBS report gives a chart (at the end) from 2000 to 2015 with the netto per person for each individual year. So yes. And the EC website has data sets of total contribution from the NL for every year aswell. No combination of years would in any way support your chart. Your chart says its using only 2014 for the sums received by countries atleast btw.
I didnt say the EC stats are not accurate. I just said that not even the EC stats support your chart. The EC stats you can find on their website with reports and datasets. They do not support your obviously false chart. Your chart, which claims to be from the EC yet is nowhere to be found on the EC's website or anywhere else in media or whatever as I mentioned before and is not accurate to the actual stats found on the EC's website/publishings/tools. I dont know how much longer you want to keep this up. But you wanted to know : You got my answer and argumentation. Now you really ought to start providing evidence for your chart being accurate and being made by the EC or supported by the EC stats to prove you are not spouting the false shit as I claim you are.
^^^^^^ but at the end of the day, do you agree or disagree that the Dutch are net contributors into the EU???
How is it that it took the police so long to give the right name of the London WestMinster attacker? How can someone go under a totally different name than the one he was born with? He was born as Adrian Russel Elm. His mother marries a man with the family name Ajao and he continues as Adrian Russel Ajao and in the end is shot dead named Khalid Masood.
Reading the Guardian on line I came across this article. You see a woman with headscarf with a facial expression clearly in distress. According to the article it was used by people to make hate comments about muslims. Part from the article: "A tweet of the image by a Trump supporter with the comment, “Muslim woman pays no mind to the terror attack, casually walks by a dying man while checking phone” drew nearly 2,000 retweets. He later tweeted it again alongside a photo of the Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood performing CPR on a victim with the caption “the main difference between Muslims and Christians”. Fake mongers, what a disgusting shit holes they are without any shame at all. One of the Christian commands is: "Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour" https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...er-bridge-attack-victim-photo-misappropriated Photo of woman in hijab passing attack victim on bridge 'misappropriated' Anti-Islam blogs claim that photograph taken in Westminster is evidence for Muslims’ indifference to suffering A second photo (above) shows the woman visibly distressed as she passes the scene of the attack on Westminster Bridge. Photograph: Jamie Lorriman The photographer whose picture of a woman walking past a victim of the Westminster terrorist attack was claimed by anti-Islam blogs as evidence for the faith’s indifference to suffering has defended her and said the image was “misappropriated”. The picture, showing a woman wearing a hijab and looking at her phone on Westminster Bridge as people gathered around an injured person, was held up by some on social media as evidence of her lack of concern. It was widely republished and commented on. Facebook Twitter Pinterest The image that was shared on social media showing the woman looking at her phone. Photograph: Jamie Lorriman Jamie Lorriman, who took the photo and is based in London, told Australia’s ABC the series of images he took showed the woman’s distress. “The people who took on that picture are being rather selective,” he said. “In the other picture in the sequence she looks truly distraught ... personally I think she looks distressed in both pictures. “It’s wrong it’s been misappropriated in that way.” Before Lorriman’s response, Tim Young, who calls himself a political comedian, tweeted from the US: Tim Young (@TimRunsHisMouth) This photo taken by UK parliament today after the London terrorist attack could end up being one of the most iconic of our time #westminster pic.twitter.com/Xnq7ytJf93 March 22, 2017 He also condemned a man for appearing to take a selfie at the scene. A tweet of the image by a Trump supporter with the comment, “Muslim woman pays no mind to the terror attack, casually walks by a dying man while checking phone” drew nearly 2,000 retweets. He later tweeted it again alongside a photo of the Conservative MP Tobias Ellwood performing CPR on a victim with the caption “the main difference between Muslims and Christians”. His tweets, and others making the same comparison, were met with a variety of responses, ranging from scathing to supportive. Defending the woman, some users shared images of the scene on Westminster Bridge that showed other passers-by appearing unconcerned. Zane Asmiri (@ZaneTheSane) If anyone posts that pic of the Muslim woman walking by this scene in #London, reply with this pic showing a man doing the same. https://t.co/9sWFqSND8v March 22, 2017 Many people argued that she was likely to have been in shock and phoning family or friends. Amy Ashenden (@AmyAshenden) Some disgusting hateful memes spreading re #Westminster of a young woman in hijab most likely in deep shock & calling family/friends. V sad March 22, 2017 Rajwinder (@Rajeh1980) People tweeting the photo of the lady in the hijab walking past share the same form of hate as the killer #Westminster #WeStandTogether March 23, 2017 Dr Alan McManus (@gumptionology) Young woman wearing hijab on #Westminster bridge saw 6 people already w/ victim, looks shocked at unfolding events. #Islamophobia #hindsight March 22, 2017 Lorriman, who had been taking photographs of parliament at the time of the attack, told The Guardian he felt the pictures clearly showed the woman in distress. “Looking back at the pictures now she looks visibly distraught in both pictures in my opinion,” he said. “She’s in the middle of an unfolding horrific scene... I think her expression to me says that she’s horrified by what she’s seen and she just needs to get out of the situation. “We were all being told to clear the bridge at various stages, so it’s not unreasonable to think she’d been told to leave the bridge at some point just like everybody else.” Lorriman said he felt the stronger reaction to the photograph had been from people coming to the woman’s defence. “People going, ‘you weren’t there, you didn’t see it, you’ve no idea what that woman’s thinking, so how can you possibly assume that she’s just casually on her phone?’” “It’s good to see that that seems to be the overwhelming response to the messages that are being put out there by certain people.” He told the ABC it was “impossible to know” what was going through the woman’s mind. “The look on the woman’s face, she’s horrified, she’s in the middle of a traumatic situation. She probably just wanted to get off the bridge. “I feel so sorry for the woman in the picture. If she’s seen this, she must feel awful.” Shameles shitholes these tweeters are.
After 7 years of continually voting to repeal the ACA, trumpcare, the replacement collapses when both the moderate & ultra conservative wings of the GOP revolt ! It is apparently dead now for the near future & won't be brought up ! What a massive f*** up & a total failure for Trump. This is what he campaigned on (& the GOP for 6-7 years) & he has a Super-majority, both houses. This guy is a complete incompetent tool who has no management skills but got lucky because of his dad's money. Totally rushed the bill, couldn't get the votes or convince his own people, an absolute mess !
Statement from the Muslim woman photographed on Westminster Bridge during #WestminsterAttack (via @TellMamaUK) pic.twitter.com/BhbfB8XgwY— Steve Rose (@steveplrose) March 24, 2017
@ BD I called you out on false/fake news you posted, you called me a retard and claimed it was from the EC, I pointed out that it wasnt and that the content is false.. So back up your chart and its authenticity with evidence which you can all easily find on the EC's website (except that all evidence proves that its not authentic or accurate). Or just grow a pair and admit that you posted false/fake news, and Im not going to bother you as to the why.
You didnt answer my question. Here it is again: https://www.bigsoccer.com/threads/comments-unrelated-to-football.2035295/page-81#post-35268396 Also, how do you know the stats you posted from cbs.nl are accurate and my chart isnt?? Were you there personally when all the data was collected??
You are just continuing not backing up your own chart or authenticity by asking stupid questions which has nothing to do with the subject.Subject being you posting a false/fake chart. FYI I already answered that question in my posts multiple times. Including linking the CBS report which proved exactly that and has a title exactly that. I dont know how to put this in terms easy for you to understand, im just repeating myself. Your chart says its from the EC. But the EC's website does not have this chart. The content of your chart is not reconcilable with the official EC stats its supposed to be based on. So now its your turn to give an answer and produce what ive been asking you for.
Alright dude, I think people generally shouldnt put others on ignore no matter what the differences as long as both parties are somewhat respectful and more importantly atleast willing to discuss things, but if those prerequisites are not there then there is no point going on. So just so you know and its in the open, I am going to do us both a favour and put you on ignore, and we can move on with this thread.
You shouldn't do that. It doesn't remove his posts it just prevents you from getting triggered. Shows lack of self control. We haven't even got a dozen regular posters on this forum and people feel like they have to put each other on ignore...
Senseless trolling coupled with constant personal attacks which is apperently fine as long as just one side does it. If the other side would do the same the thread would get shut down. Its not just this though, he is not willing to back up or explain anything he posts, so everytime I question him about something it turns into this senseless trolling with personal attacks. If he is completely unwilling to explain or discuss anything, then im just not going to bother reading his post. Its not like im punishing him, he can spout out whatever shit he wants, I dont make the rules here. Im just not going to bother reading it anymore.
Looking for news about the 80th Kuip birthday I stumbled over this: http://www.ad.nl/rotterdam/turken-bellen-massaal-naar-rotterdam-in-de-vs~ae31fcba/ "Turken bellen massaal naar Rotterdam... in de VS De spanningen met Turkije zorgen óók in de gemeente Rotterdam in New York State in de Verenigde Staten voor onrust. De telefoon van het politiebureau daar stond vorig weekend roodgloeiend toen in het Nederlandse Rotterdam twee Turkse ministers geen campagne voor het referendum mochten voeren. Marjolein Kooyman 21-03-17, 08:44 Laatste update: 09:01 2k 95 M 1 Bij de Shenectady County emergency dispatch, waar de gemeente Rotterdam (30.000 inwoners) onder valt, kwamen op zaterdagavond 11 maart tientallen boze telefoontjes uit Turkije binnen. De Turken dachten Nederland te bellen, maar vergisten zich."
LOL..... that's hilarious. There's also a town named Amsterdam in New York state. Thats where all the drug dealers live https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amsterdam_(city),_New_York
https://dailygazette.com/article/20...4aa-5561-4639-862e-3d8c331651a7.1490608664719 "The problem with being named Rotterdam Wrong number: Turks angry with Netherlands city call local dispatch center Stephen Williams | March 15, 2017 The Schenectady County Unified Communications Center was inundated with calls from Turkey last weekend. Photographer: Marc Schultz When the Schenectady County emergency dispatch center began getting strange overseas calls Saturday night, dispatchers quickly figured out something odd was going on. Turkish nationalists were calling to harass the Rotterdam police in response to a heated diplomatic dispute Turkey was having with the Netherlands, and were reportedly playing recordings of Turkish nationalist songs."