Okay, so please explain further. And I mean please explain further, because I have yet to see a valid argument from any of you. All I've heard so far was "troll" and '"I dont take you seriously". None of these are valid counter-arguments, sorry
So Geertje koekepeertje does as if something new happened and you just repost it without checking what geertje liegebeestje presents to his easy gullable audience. He saw from DT that you can lie the shit out of everything to your imbecil followers and they swallow it as they would swallow manure being a gourmet treat: Oude video vechtpartij in 2015 AZC Apeldoorn duikt weer op - Drimble https://drimble.nl/.../oude-video-vechtpartij-in-2015-azc-apeldoorn-duikt-weer-op.ht... 1 dag geleden - Oude video vechtpartij in 2015 AZC Apeldoorn duikt weer op. Bron: Apeldoorn ... Wilders twittert oud filmpje vechtpartij in asielzoekerscentrum. So he posted the message that since 2015 he didnot have anything on his pet targets to stirr up his imbecils, so he treats those demented Alzheimerists with old news. And typically you without checking the truth of your liar leaders allegations post it here. Where is that rep of your pal under that post?
I hope we keep this thread going, and I also hope O14 doesnt use his mod powers to shut this thread down
Why should he? We are very civil to you. The condescending remarks are towards the followers of your pet politicians in general That was me, by the way, and I explained why. So no, not without supporting explanation, being that I have the suspicion you are just toying to get reactions. Fine with me as it gives the opportunity to post seriously ment items for those interested. I have to check the number of posts in here and the views to see if we 4 or 5 are the only ones reading it.
This is the point where we (again) have to first agree (and actually follow up this time) that we wont escalate this into personal attacks or insults. Otherwise its a guarenteed trainwreck.
I'm constantly on this thread reading it, probably more so than any other. I enjoy reading comments from Trump supporters, funny little creatures they are.
Okay, so anyone who leans slightly Right and who 99% of this forum might disagree with, should be shut down, banned, or have his posting privileges taken away??? Am I doing this right?? FTR I am not trolling. I stand by everything I write. Even though that might not be popular (on this site). But is bigsoccer.com now banning people because their posts are unpopular??? Sounds a bit like China
Okay then please construct some kind of counter-argument, because so far all I've heard from you is "troll". Surely you can do better than that, no??
How about you come to terms with the fact not everyone is going to agree with your politics?? Is this so hard to understand?? Do you feel the personal need to have everyone agree with your point of view?? That sounds to me like you feel the need for acceptance from other people of the opposite side of the political spectrum. Me honestly, I could care less if you agree or disagree with me on politics. Heck, sometimes I find opposite views very interesting, and on the odd occasion I will even change my mind on certain things (its rare, but it does happen). And thats because I'm willing to be open-minded. But hey, thats just me
So, back to relevant news, here's a research into who voted for Brexit. Sad to see it were a lot with the attitude they didnot have anything to loose, which connects to my post about that Nobel prize winner a few days ago. https://www.buzzfeed.com/jamesball/...-and-who-didnt?utm_term=.wxjk1Embk#.un1LwYyXL Here’s Who Voted For Brexit – And Who Didn’t Leave voters were older, poorer, less educated, and far more likely to think the country was getting worse than Remain voters, new research shows. posted on Dec. 7, 2016, at 1:02 a.m. James Ball BuzzFeed Special Correspondent Tweet Tumblr Leon Neal / Getty Images Five months after British voters shocked pollsters and markets alike by voting to leave the EU, leading British social research institute NatCen has delivered the most comprehensive analysis yet of why the UK voted to leave the EU and who voted Leave in the ballot box.
I have not once said what my political affiliation is, I just said I don't want to read about politics. Nor have I ever threatened to ban you or anyone else. I come to this forum to read about soccer and what's going in the Netherlands, trust me, I would ignore this thread if I wasn't a moderator. It seems people are becoming upset with other's opinions and could lead down the road to having this thread closed won if people can't remain civil. There is a political forum on BigSoccer which I hope you are very active on, because I'm sure others would love to read your opinions as well.
So far everyone is being civil and the use of the emoticons reinforces that. My only point earlier is that when we have beaten a topic into submission we should all move on to something else. To BD regarding the Hilary news clip: I think this was aired during the campaign season. Note that she was laughing at the results of the polygraph test and that it destroyed her faith in it as a reliable tool. She was a young lawyer at the time and in the US everyone is entitled to a defense as they are presumed innocent. The guy said he was innocent and she was his defender. He ended up plea bargaining admitting guilt. What's wrong with that? It's how our justice system works. What is most disturbing to me these days is the wide belief in fake news. The son of Trump's appointee for security advisor just got kicked off the transition team for continuing to believe the bogus child porn story (I drove past that restaurant last night and didn't see any kids walking in and out of the joint! So this disturbed guy from NC drives up during the weekend with an assault weapon, wanting to put an end to something that doesn't exist. There are lots of people in this country that believe stuff like this. Rather than going out on pep rallies, the President Elect could give a serious speech on this topic and maybe put an end (or big dent) in it. We are on the verge of turning into a laughing stock of a country.
You have not said what your political affiliation is, but I can probably take a guess. And if you dont wanna read about politics, then why are you even responding to this thread?? I mean that with all due respect. I'm not here to start a fight. Cheers
Even though that audio made Hillary look insensitive, I do agree with you that everybody deserves a fair trial. So WOW, we actually agree on something
How about an advisor to the president in secret service affairs that is very deep in believing in conspiracy theories, especially against them. These 4 years are going to be hilarious.....disastrous
Even though that audio made Hillary look insensitive, I do agree with you that everybody deserves a fair trial. So WOW, we actually agree on something I'm very sorry, but I don't have a racist bone in my body
Yes, it was so strange how that whole thing unfolded. My younger daughter lived right across the street from the restaurant and the other stores for two years not long ago. She and friends used to go to that restaurant.