2022 WC qualification--tracking the rankings (R)

Discussion in 'CONCACAF' started by Robert Borden, Nov 1, 2018.

  1. Blondo

    Blondo Member+

    Sep 21, 2013
    @ThreeApples I'm trying to be helpful by sharing a link to that site. It's a good source for this sort of thing. Also, soon he'll update the hex projections (with I-factor = 25 instead of 15). That FIFA doesn't publish a list of which games are included in the rankings any longer is a pain in the ass for him as well (needs to make small adjustments himself).
     
  2. nfitz

    nfitz Member

    Aug 20, 2007
    Toronto
    It does seem that Canada has a better chance of finishing "best of the rest" and then taking on the number 4 team in the Hex, rather than playing in the Hex, and finishing better than 4th (or even worse, 5th or 6th).

    But what do we get out of that - another year of playing minnows like Cuba and St. Vincent ... which are getting increasingly hard to fill stadium, and get much interest.

    Need better competition to improve. Canada needs to be in the Hex.
     
  3. Paul Calixte

    Paul Calixte Moderator
    Staff Member

    Orlando City SC
    Apr 30, 2009
    Miami, FL
    Club:
    Orlando City SC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This isn't even a question: much better to take their chances in the Hex (and possibly claw their way to 3rd and straight to Qatar) then having to go through FIVE playoff rounds to reach the Promised Land.
     
    BocaFan, slaminsams and edcalvi repped this.
  4. edcalvi

    edcalvi Moderator
    Staff Member

    Olimpia
    Guatemala
    May 1, 2005
    US
    Away games in Central America are no easy task.

    I mean even the USMNT struggles in Guatemala City for example, imagine Canada?

    The Hexagonal is a much better option to qualify than an early playoff elimination versus a CA opponent
     
  5. nfitz

    nfitz Member

    Aug 20, 2007
    Toronto
    I'd prefer to be in the Hex, but Canada hasn't performed well in the Hex. Could easily finish 4th, 5th, or 6th.

    Canada is 1-1-1 playing in Guatemala.

    To succeed in the Hex, Canada still has to win away in Latin America - against tougher teams than Guatemala or Cuba!
     
  6. Paul Calixte

    Paul Calixte Moderator
    Staff Member

    Orlando City SC
    Apr 30, 2009
    Miami, FL
    Club:
    Orlando City SC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I doubt Canada sputtering out in 1997 is in any way indicative of how they would do now.
     
    jagum repped this.
  7. Robert Borden

    Robert Borden Member+

    Chelsea
    Canada
    Apr 19, 2017
    Toronto, Ontario
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    And we did qualify for the intercontinental playoff for 94...which we lost to Australia
     
  8. Robert Borden

    Robert Borden Member+

    Chelsea
    Canada
    Apr 19, 2017
    Toronto, Ontario
    Nat'l Team:
    Canada
    I recall Forge FC doing well against Antigua GFC
     
  9. edcalvi

    edcalvi Moderator
    Staff Member

    Olimpia
    Guatemala
    May 1, 2005
    US
    WCQ is a different animal from club football.
     
  10. edcalvi

    edcalvi Moderator
    Staff Member

    Olimpia
    Guatemala
    May 1, 2005
    US
    That Canadian win was in the semi-final round of WCQ for Germany 2006.

    Guatemala had already clinched qualification to the hexagonal and the game was played with mostly non-starters (not taken seriously). The first match was a 0-2 victory on Canadian soil.
     
    nfitz repped this.
  11. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    In a Hexagonal of Mexico, USA, Costa Rica, Jamaica, Honduras, and Canada, Canada would play the top two Central American teams. Antigua isn't close to one of the top two Central American clubs. They're tied for 27th among Central American clubs in ArsenalMetro's coefficients.
     
    edcalvi repped this.
  12. ChuckBlazersCat

    Tottenham Hotspur, Celtic FC, FC St. Pauli, Chicago Fire
    United States
    Mar 25, 2019
  13. Blondo

    Blondo Member+

    Sep 21, 2013
    I guess the one for El Salvador was due to rounding as well. That could very well be a close battle with a Hex spot at stake.
    The link is to (Dutch) Ed's site (previously Romanian Ed). I'm just sharing it, not mine. A few errors there too, unusual.

    I've been rounding to two decimal places (a while back I could check FIFA but they don't show the decimals any longer). Yet my numbers were a bit off as well. Rounding to four or more decimal places would do the trick.
     
  14. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    New official rankings--I was off by one point for Jamaica and El Salvador. Seems that the pre-window friendlies that I overlooked because I didn't know about them were not recognized by FIFA. As of now I'm only aware of MEX vs. TRI scheduled to play out-of-window on Oct. 2.

    MEX 1603 (-1)
    USA 1545 (-3)
    CRC 1442 (-3)
    JAM 1435 (+10)
    HON 1359 (+9)
    SLV 1327 (-15)
    --
    CAN 1322 (+10) [+1]
    CUW 1320 (+11) [+1]
    PAN 1316 (-15) [-2]
    HAI 1277 (-11)
    TRI 1226
    ATG 1137 (+1)
     
    appwrangler repped this.
  15. edcalvi

    edcalvi Moderator
    Staff Member

    Olimpia
    Guatemala
    May 1, 2005
    US
    This is interesting.

    I never in my mind thought that one day we were gonna be taking these FIFA rankings seriously.

    At least for now, every game counts.

     
  16. EvanJ

    EvanJ Member+

    Manchester United
    United States
    Mar 30, 2004
    Club:
    Manchester United FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    #117 EvanJ, Sep 22, 2019
    Last edited: Sep 22, 2019
    FIFA doesn't give any decimal places. Using two decimal places would be sufficient. With one decimal place you run the risk of double rounding producing errors such as .45 to .5 to 1 when it should be rounded in one step and round to 0. Even if you're adding and subtracting changes from different games, three decimal places should be safe. I didn't like that even when FIFA gave two decimal places, rankings were based on whole numbers, so teams with 100.49 points and 99.50 points were tied. If MLB has a tie for the batting title when using the normal three decimal places, they will use as many decimal places as necessary, and there can't be a tie for the batting title unless there is an exact tie.

    In WCQs for 2014, Cuba got a bye to the Semifinals for being in the top six. I don't think fans considered the one of the top six, and they got 1 point and 1 goal from 6 Semifinal games when they ended with a 1-1 draw hosting Panama. It's easy for a team to get their only point(s)* and/or goals in their last qualifier if they're eliminated in a two game aggregate, but it's harder to do that if they're eliminated in a group.

    * I know points aren't used in aggregates. If you prefer, you can change "point(s)" to "games they didn't lose."

    Being in the top six then didn't matter as much as it does now.
     
    edcalvi repped this.
  17. ChuckBlazersCat

    Tottenham Hotspur, Celtic FC, FC St. Pauli, Chicago Fire
    United States
    Mar 25, 2019
    Cuba is just kind of it's own case, since they can certainly assemble a team that can put together a series of good results in the short term, and then lose the players responsible for those results very quickly.
     
  18. Kyle_The_Hill

    Kyle_The_Hill New Member

    Toronto FC
    Canada
    Oct 3, 2019
    Will the Mexico vs T&T game count towards FIFA points since they both used over 3 subs?
     
  19. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Up to 6 subs are allowed in friendlies. For example, the USA used 6 subs in the recent friendly against Uruguay, and that counted in the rankings. I don't see any reason this game shouldn't count in the rankings. It's outside the FIFA window, so that means it gets a weighting factor of 5, half the weight of a friendly in the window.

    I'll post more completely later, but Mexico won 2-0, and I have it as +1 point for Mexico. Not too big a deal.
     
  20. Kyle_The_Hill

    Kyle_The_Hill New Member

    Toronto FC
    Canada
    Oct 3, 2019
    Thank you!
     
  21. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    OK, this means almost nothing, but it happened.

    2 October


    Friendly
    Mexico(1603) vs. Trinidad & Tobago(1226) 2-0
    1-(1/(10^(-377/600) + 1)) = 0.1905
    5 * 0.1905 = 0.9525
    MEX +1 TRI -1

    MEX 1604 (+1)
    USA 1545
    CRC 1442
    JAM 1435
    HON 1359
    SLV 1327
    --
    CAN 1322
    CUW 1320
    PAN 1316
    HAI 1277
    TRI 1225 (-1)
    ATG 1137
     
    Ciro Di Marzio and wixson7 repped this.
  22. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Back in business with the Nations League.

    10 October

    League A

    Honduras(1359) vs. Trinidad & Tobago (1225) 2-0
    1 - (1/(10^(-134/600) + 1)) = 0.3742
    25 * 0.3742 = 9.355
    HON +9 TRI -9

    Haiti(1277) vs. Costa Rica(1442) 1-1
    0.5 - (1/(10^(165/600) + 1)) = 0.1532
    25 * 0.1532 = 3.83
    HAI +4 CRC -4

    MEX 1604 (+1)
    USA 1545
    CRC 1438 (-4)
    JAM 1435
    HON 1368 (+9)
    SLV 1327
    --
    CAN 1322
    CUW 1320
    PAN 1316
    HAI 1281 (+4)
    TRI 1216 (-10)
    ATG 1137
    (point change since last official rankings)

    Honduras continues to take care of business. In three matches it has increased its margin over the line from 19 to 46. Haiti got a late equalizer for a draw, but that's not enough to revive any faint hope.

    Next:

    League A
    USA vs. Cuba
    Bermuda vs. Mexico

    League B
    Antigua & Barbuda vs. Guyana
     
    wixson7 repped this.
  23. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Three games today, but nobody near the cutoff line.

    11 October

    League A

    USA(1545) vs. Cuba(940) 7-0
    1 - (1/(10^(-505/600) + 1)) = 0.1259
    25 * 0.1259 = 3.1475
    USA +3 CUB -3

    Bermuda(987) vs. Mexico(1604) 1-5
    1- (1/(10^(-617/600) + 1)) = 0.0857
    25 * 0.0857 = 2.1425
    MEX +2 BER -2

    League B
    Antigua & Barbuda(1137) vs. Guyana(960) 2-1
    1 - (1/(10^(-177/600) + 1)) = 0.3364
    25 * 0.3364 = 8.41
    ATG +8 GUY -8

    MEX 1606 (+3)
    USA 1548 (+3)
    CRC 1438 (-4)
    JAM 1435
    HON 1368 (+9)
    SLV 1327
    --
    CAN 1322
    CUW 1320
    PAN 1316
    HAI 1281 (+4)
    TRI 1216 (-10)
    ATG 1145 (+8)
    (point change since last official rankings)

    Next:

    League B
    Montserrat vs. El Salvador
    Jamaica vs. Aruba
     
    bigsoccertst1 repped this.
  24. ThreeApples

    ThreeApples Member+

    Jul 28, 1999
    Smurf Village
    Club:
    San Jose Earthquakes
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    If nothing else, today's contending teams followed Rule #1: Don't lose to CONCACAF minnows.

    12 October

    League B

    Montserrat(912) vs. El Salvador(1327) 0-2
    1 - (1/(10^(-415/600) + 1)) = 0.1690
    25 * 0.1690 = 4.225
    SLV +4 MSR -4

    Jamaica(1435) vs. Aruba(890) 2-0
    1 - (1/(10^(-545/600) + 1) = 0.1099
    25 * 0.1099 = 2.7475
    JAM +3 ARU -3

    MEX 1606 (+3)
    USA 1548 (+3)
    CRC 1438 (-4)
    JAM 1438 (+3)
    HON 1368 (+9)
    SLV 1331 (+4)
    --
    CAN 1322
    CUW 1320
    PAN 1316
    HAI 1281 (+4)
    TRI 1216 (-10)
    ATG 1145 (+8)
    (point change since last official rankings)

    For the first time there is a tie in ranking points in my unofficial rankings. A tie for third place doesn't matter, but it does raise the possibility that this whole process could end with a tie for sixth place. I'm sure that FIFA's internal calculations use fractional point totals, so nobody's really tied when you extend the decimal places, but it rounds off to integers in the published rankings and considers teams to be tied when they have the same integer total.

    It would be a very CONCACAF-esque end to all this if there were a tie in the published point totals, and then they had to tell us "Team X is 'really' the 6th-place team according to the numbers in FIFA's internal computers."

    Next:

    League A

    Costa Rica vs. Curacao
    Honduras vs. Martinique (will not count)
     

Share This Page