2019-2020 UEFA Referee Discussion [Rs]

Discussion in 'Referee' started by MassachusettsRef, Jun 3, 2019.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. socal lurker

    socal lurker Member+

    May 30, 2009
    I don't believe that, outside MLS, there are OFRs on OSP. It's a factual matter and the VAR reports the facts to the R.

    You're losing the three dimensional aspect here. Look at the line going down from each player, which shows where the most advanced body part that matters is. That's why the red line is where it is--onside behind the blue line. It's the angle/perspective that makes it look like he is ahead of the defender.
     
  2. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This is the saved penalty that wasn’t retaken today. His right leg is in the air so it’s slightly closer than it looks, but still a pretty obvious violation. And again, the VAR in this match was just a VAR at the U20s. So two different standards in effect.

    https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D9XgyoYX4AAYsZE.jpg
     
  3. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Group C

    England - Romania: EKBERG (SWE) [VARs: Pinheiro, Godinho (POR)]
    France - Croatia: GOZUBUYUK (NED) [VARs: Kamphuis, Nijhuis (NED)]
     
  4. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    This penalty stood with no VAR intervention, which given the standards that have already become established, I find baffling:

    https://streamable.com/qjs6g
     
  5. sulfur

    sulfur Member+

    Oct 22, 2007
    Ontario, Canada
    It's similar to the ARG v SCO one yesterday. The Scotland player got the ball, bounced it aside (though not as forcefully as this one), opponent fell over.

    "Clear" penalty. :)
     
  6. code1390

    code1390 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 25, 2007
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Were you looking at the same replays as the rest of us? That was a stone cold penalty.
     
    MassachusettsRef repped this.
  7. El Rayo Californiano

    Feb 3, 2014
    #82 El Rayo Californiano, Jun 20, 2019
    Last edited: Jun 20, 2019
    I hope it's alright to put this here. In Spain Deportivo de la La Coruña and Mallorca are playing a two-match playoff to determine the final promotion from second division to first division. The first match was today in La Coruña, Deportivo in blue and white and Mallorca in red and black. The referee was Trujillo Suárez.

    A scary moment in the 40th minute. Video here, starting around 0:25, of Mallorca #6's challenge to Deportivo #4. I'm pretty sure the referee signaled advantage with his left arm. In any event, he allowed the Deportivo attack to continue, whistled to stop play when Mallorca gained possession in its defensive third, and then sprinted back up field to the injured player. By the time the camera panned back to midfield, Deportivo's bench personnel were already on the field tending to #4. I presume the fourth official advised him over comms that the injury was serious and that Mallorca #6's challenge merited a red card. Play restarted with a dropped ball.

    Here's another video of the incident:

    For other reasons, Deportivo's second goal may merit attention. It's at the link above, and more angles below. No goal-line technology or VAR in Spanish second division.
     
  8. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Group A

    Spain - Poland: MADDEN (SCO) [VARs: Kamphuis, Nijhuis (NED)]
    Belgium - Italy: JOVANOVIC (SRB) [VARs: Dingert, Stieler (GER)]
     
  9. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Group B

    Denmark - Serbia: KULBAKOV (BLR) [VARs: Guida, Fabbri (ITA)]
    Austria - Germany: TREIMANIS (LVA) [VARs: Attwell, Tierney (ENG)]
     
  10. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Group C

    France - Romania: KABAKOV (BGR) [VARs: de Burgos, Estrada Fernandez (ESP)]
    England - Croatia: GRINFELD (ISR) [VARs: Pinheiro, Godinho (POR)]
     
  11. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
  12. El Rayo Californiano

    Feb 3, 2014
    So Red #17 interferes with an opponent on the shot? Is that how they get the offside infraction?
     
  13. Thezzaruz

    Thezzaruz Member+

    Jun 20, 2011
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Sweden
    Unfortunately the video isn't clear enough to be sure but it looks like that the white player touches the ball again after the touch by the red player. If that's correct then I have no issues with the PK.
     
  14. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I'm pretty sure they were reviewing to see if the referee actually blew the whistle before the ball went in the net. Once they determined that the whistle did go first, he had to stick with the patently obvious incorrect offside call that the AR flagged in the build-up.

    OR, yes, they made something up about the fallen player somehow interfering with an opponent or maybe even the ball touching the player. But, you know, that all looks false.

    This is a lesson in why not only the delayed flag is important in the VAR era, but so is a delayed whistle if there is any hope of the ball still going in the net. Unkel appropriately waited in MLS a few weeks ago and got blasted because the audio output was wrong. In this case, the referee simply blew the whistle when he shouldn't have after the AR raised an incorrect flag when he shouldn't have (even if it was correct). This was their second live match with VAR, I think.
     
    El Rayo Californiano repped this.
  15. balu

    balu Member+

    Oct 18, 2013
    Semifinals

    Germany - Romania: GRINFELD (ISR) [VARs: Guida, Fabbri (ITA), Observer: Rosetti (ITA)]
    Spain - France: KABAKOV (BGR) [VARs: Pinheiro, Godinho (POR), Observer: Cortez Batista (POR)]
     
  16. Thezzaruz

    Thezzaruz Member+

    Jun 20, 2011
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Sweden
    So... No discussion about this call? https://streamja.com/2oy6
    Have to say that I was a bit surprised to see it given considering history/precedence (Neuer at the 2014 WC for one) but maybe it being youth football makes a difference.
     
  17. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I hadn't seen it.

    It's a good call. Part of me will say "times have changed" because I know my position on Neuer, but another part of me would simply say this is much worse because there's no need to lead with the knee like that on that play (whereas on the Neuer play, I felt the position of the knee in question was part of a natural jumping motion, but there's no need to re-litigate that again!).

    Was this given with or without VAR help? And was there a card accompanying the penalty?
     
  18. Thezzaruz

    Thezzaruz Member+

    Jun 20, 2011
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Sweden
    According to the UEFA site it was given by the ref as a PK + caution and then VAR checked it and left it alone.


    I'm torn. Partly I like the PK as the knee is very much out (whereas Neuer made contact with the thigh/hip) and keepers need to be forced to take a bit more care than they historically have expected to do.

    But I also think that the attacker is moving into the situation a lot more than the keeper is and that without having any idea about where the keeper (or anyone else) is and that means that he takes out the keeper in a big way. And he's nowhere near challenging for the ball, he doesn't even try.

    In the end I think I want it to be called as a PK but I don't think there really is precedence to do so and as a one off decision I'm not sure I like it. But yea I'm torn.
     
  19. socal lurker

    socal lurker Member+

    May 30, 2009
    And the keeper got the ball, while the defender had no chance at the ball.

    As was discussed on the prior debate, the knee coming up is a natural part of jumping off one leg—just like a basketball layup. This does seem pronounced, however, and I don’t have a problem sending the message to keepers that regardless of how they naturally jump, they have an obligation to control the knee when jumping at head height. But, IMHO (and perhaps biased as a former GK), that needs to be announced/distributed as a policy (perhaps it has been), and doesn’t work as one-offs by individual refs. The goal is to stop the behavior, not to create PKs.
     
    Thezzaruz repped this.
  20. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Good. I think that's right.

    I guess I just don't see it this way. The attacker is in an area where there is expected to be traffic--there are four defenders right around him. I just can't see faulting an attacker for moving toward goal. The fact that he's doing so at what one might call a meandering pace by the time the foul occurs is an indicator that he realizes the ball is too high for him to even bother challenging for it. So, to that point, I don't think you can fault him for not challenging for a ball that he couldn't possibly challenge for.

    The goalkeeper has to have some degree of responsibility for where he lands and who he might nearly murder on his way to the ball. Getting the ball on the turf with a slide doesn't excuse an otherwise accidental foul. And it definitely doesn't excuse it if the action is reckless or worse. This isn't a knee slightly out because a forward jumping motion requires it; the knee is out and brought up--we've probably all heard goalkeepers in the past claim they do this for "protection."

    Precedence is really the only good argument for not calling this. But everyone has been on the head injury train for about 5 years now. Like the Hamid challenge in MLS last month, eventually we have to start punishing unacceptable foul actions that risk serious head injuries, no matter the lack of precedence, or it's all just lip service.
     
  21. Thezzaruz

    Thezzaruz Member+

    Jun 20, 2011
    Club:
    Arsenal FC
    Nat'l Team:
    Sweden
    I agree with everything except the highlighted part. He might not have gone for the ball but even with a knee to the head he still sent the keeper tumbling through the air. I don't faul't him for not going for the ball, I fault him for his part in creating a collision in a situation where he couldn't possibly challenge for the ball.
     
  22. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    I guess we just see it differently, though admittedly I'm not passionate about this because it's a difficult call and it's happening in a time when we are trying to change approaches.

    For me, if one field player hit another field player like that in the center circle, we wouldn't fault the guy who got hit in the head with the knee. I understand we sometimes (bordering on often) call the guy who didn't jump for "tripping" when he upends the opponent who goes into an aerial challenge. But not if the guy gets a knee to the head.

    What makes this difficult is that we know keepers jump with different timing than their opponent, because they can grab the ball higher in the air than the opponent who can head it. And we know that might mean a knee could be in the wrong place at the wrong time. So it's tough. But this one just seems blatant to me and falls in the category of something that we need to be calling going forward.
     
  23. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Grinfeld had a very good and gutsy DOGSO red. I haven’t found a good clean clip yet, though.

    Kabakov had this. https://streamable.com/6m4d6
     
  24. code1390

    code1390 Moderator
    Staff Member

    Nov 25, 2007
    Club:
    Tottenham Hotspur FC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    roby and refinDC repped this.
  25. MassachusettsRef

    MassachusettsRef Moderator
    Staff Member

    Apr 30, 2001
    Washington, DC
    Nat'l Team:
    United States
    Foul only.
     

Share This Page