[The Year Was1955]

Has it been confirmed that we only have him for only a year then? I haven't read this anywhere, if so I'm pretty surprised, I thought this was the only thing our Trevor had gotten right so far.

We can’t even get a bosman right anymore. I know Trev is pretty financially restricted and starting his job in a pretty restricted environment (what with the downfall of the football market and all), but if it turns out we don't even have De Lucas long term then I think he has so far been quite a disappointment.

But this is the kind of thing that would have been reported on the Chelsea site though surely?

Plus I am starting to wish we had of just kept SDB even if it ment letting him go on a free next season.

Unless we were really desperate for cash?