This last week has been an unusual one to say the very least with regard to the stadium.
Firstly on Tuesday evening, club chairman Karl Oyston was a guest together with the chairmen of both Burnley and PKE on BBC Radio Lancashire. And he did himself absolutely no favours with his "performance" and attitude, especially about the stadium.
Yet again he said that there are no plans to start building the South Stand. This despite before the season started he claimed that he would be focussing entirely on getting the SW Corner and the South Stand completed this season. His reasons beggar belief as he claims that there is no need for it to be built as the current stands are not full every game.
Even though 50% of all home games have been sold out for home fans and it is very likley that most of the remaining home games will be virtually sold out. So the fans are doing their bit. The other 50% have been not far from full. Plus even though our average home attendance is third bottom in the Championship, we are TOP in terms of percentage of capacity (89%) so what more can the fans do?
The Blackpool Gazette and the BBC have picked up on the anger from Blackpool fans.
So what happens next? On Thursday it emerges that the club have applied for planning permission to increase the capacity at the ground! Great news? Not at all.
The East Stand (or the GK - Gene Kelly) Stand for away fans, was erected in 2003, and under the agreement when it was built, was that it had to be removed by 1st September 2008. So what have the club done? Applied to add a further six rows to the back of the East Stand, which will add 972 seats and increase capacity in the stand to 2,937. Which then of course means if it receives planning permission that the "temporary" stand can then get another new date for it to be removed. Maybe another 5 years?
What has angered Blackpool fans is a number of things - this wasn't even mentioned on Radio Lancashire. It only came out because a Blackpool fan found it on the Blackpool Council website and posted it on a 'Pool forum and the BBC have now picked it up and posted an article on their sports website, even stating on there that 'Pool fans are unhappy. Also even though it is great that at last we should have a total capacity above 10,000 (capacity would increase to 10,670) it then also means that away fans could have up to 28% of the stadium which is ridiculous. Isn't it supposed to be "Fortress Bloomfield"? Also some fans suspect that one of the main reasons the club are doing this is because the stand would otherwise have to come down in September.
And meanwhile "we have no plans to build the South Stand". So the club are quite happy to increase capacity of the East Stand which for some games this season has been half empty yet will not increase capacity for home fans who have sold out 50% of games and who have been close for thne other 50%. You couldn't make it up.