Home > Soccer Forum > World of Soccer > FIFA and Tournaments

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 08 Aug 2002, 07:45 PM   #1
kasai
BigSoccer Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: California
Default The Battle for Control of US Soccer

People are forgetting that South Africa lost out on the 2006 WC by one vote. FIFA will not be able to award the cup to any other confederation IMHO. Africa will have WC2010, and South Africa is the logical choice.

What wouldn't surprise me is if by 2007 or 2008 it is determined that South Africa cannot host the cup and it is moved to another country. Then maybe the U.S. is a good choice.





MOD NOTE: This was split from the Future of U.S. Soccer thread

Last edited by geordienation; 08 Aug 2002 at 10:06 PM.
kasai is offline   Quote 

TRY BIGSOCCER
NOW!
NEWS, SCORES & TABLES FOR 1,300 CLUBS

Connect in the web's largest forums.
Blog about soccer from your point of view.
Shop 17,000 authentic soccer items.




On sale for $102.44
at our soccer store

On sale for $112.44
or buy soccer jerseys

Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:07 PM   #2
saabrian
BigSoccer Member
 
saabrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Default The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by kenntomasch
You think they'd consider a split-season for MLS in 2010 if the US hosted the Cup?

You'd have to not play during that timeframe (mid-June to mid-July), but it'd be strange to just have a month disappear out of the heart of your season. A split-season, while it would obviously draw the ire of most traditionalists (but what doesn't?) might be at least one workable solution to what's sure to be a sticky wicket.
Africa will host the 2010 World Cup. Most likely South Africa. The next opportunity for the US would be 2014.
saabrian is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:13 PM   #3
voros
Totalled Football
 
voros's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Parts Unknown
Default Re: Re: Must Disagree

Quote:
Originally posted by Vicar


South Africa's one chance was 2006.

There is no African country that can host a world cup. There won't be for some time. There's probably only 4 or 5 countries in Europe that can host it, maybe 2-3 in Concacaf (Canada might be able to if the political will were behind it), perhaps 2 in CONMEBOL. I don't think we'll see one in Asia again for some time.
You're forgetting Australia in the discussion. They could probably do it without too much trouble (with Sydney 2000 as a blueprint).
voros is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:26 PM   #4
kenntomasch
BigSoccer Member+++
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: El desierto

Supporter: West Ham United FC
Foe: Chelsea FC
Default Re: The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by saabrian
Africa will host the 2010 World Cup. Most likely South Africa. The next opportunity for the US would be 2014.
Well, there you have it. Book your flights now.
kenntomasch is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:32 PM   #5
geordienation
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago

Supporter: DC United, FC Barcelona, Newcastle United FC
Default Re: The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by saabrian


Africa will host the 2010 World Cup. Most likely South Africa. The next opportunity for the US would be 2014.
Give me 8 stadia that could host it in South Africa.

OOPS. They don't have 8 WC-Quality stadia.

And unlike Korea and Japan, who actually have working economies, they don't have the money to build them.
geordienation is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:41 PM   #6
saabrian
BigSoccer Member
 
saabrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Upstate NY
Default The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by geordienation


Give me 8 stadia that could host it in South Africa.

OOPS. They don't have 8 WC-Quality stadia.

And unlike Korea and Japan, who actually have working economies, they don't have the money to build them.
I guess you must be more informed than the FIFA Executive committee of which a 50% - 1 voted for South Africa's 2006 bid and in which SA missed a majority only because of Oceania's rep abstained even though the confederation told him to vote for SA
saabrian is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:53 PM   #7
kenntomasch
BigSoccer Member+++
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: El desierto

Supporter: West Ham United FC
Foe: Chelsea FC
Default

http://www.worldstadiums.com/africa/...h_africa.shtml

They have several large stadia in South Africa, but I have no idea if they're in good shape or not. Ditto with their infrastructure or economy, I have no idea.
kenntomasch is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 09:59 PM   #8
geordienation
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago

Supporter: DC United, FC Barcelona, Newcastle United FC
Default Re: The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by saabrian


I guess you must be more informed than the FIFA Executive committee of which a 50% - 1 voted for South Africa's 2006 bid and in which SA missed a majority only because of Oceania's rep abstained even though the confederation told him to vote for SA
Look, I don't want to get into a pissing match. Africa has deep, deep problems which have only gotten worse since that vote was taken. South Africa had huge stadia issues even at the time of the vote and would have required an influx of cash to stage the WC. They have also been counting on foreign investment to create more accomodation infrastructure, but that's dried up as well. If the same vote were taken today, it wouldn't be nearly as close.

As a rule of thumb, look at losers in the Olympic bidding process. Often times, runners up will drop out and not re-submit (Beijing being a notable exception). When South Africa re-submits their bid and there are no credible alternatives from more developed parts of the world, then they'll the be front-runner.
geordienation is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 10:04 PM   #9
geordienation
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago

Supporter: DC United, FC Barcelona, Newcastle United FC
Default

OK, I split the threads. Africa discussion here and U.S. Soccer Federation talk over there.
geordienation is offline   Quote 
Old 08 Aug 2002, 10:24 PM   #10
superdave
Best team of this era
 
superdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Raleigh

Supporter: DC United, Blackburn Rovers FC
Foe: New York Red Bulls
Default Re: Re: The Battle for Control of US Soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by geordienation
South Africa had huge stadia issues even at the time of the vote and would have required an influx of cash to stage the WC.
With the cash crunch at FIFA, caused by the bankruptcy of Sepp's TV pals, this isn't going to fly too well.

Plus, Africa was one of the leading confeds trying to oust Blatter this spring.
superdave is offline   Quote 
Share

Reply

  Home > Forums > World of Soccer > FIFA and Tournaments


On sale for $39.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $59.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Share
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump

World of Soccer
On The Pitch
Equipment & Gear
Soccer Store
England
Europe
USA
Americas
Asia, Oceania & Africa
Women's Soccer
Not Soccer Related
Customer Service







All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:44 AM.



 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.