Home > Soccer Forum > World of Soccer > Business and Media

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 07 Aug 2002, 01:16 AM   #1
MetroDug
BigSoccer Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York, NY USA
Default FIFA banning ads on shorts

From the 8/6 New York Times:

FIFA has told the Mexican federation that it must ban
advertising on players' socks and shorts. The Mexicans said they stand to
lose $40 million if the sponsors' names have to be erased. ...

I wonder why fifa is not cracking down on MLS then too, since the league has always put sponsor logos on shorts
MetroDug is offline   Quote 

TRY BIGSOCCER
NOW!
NEWS, SCORES & TABLES FOR 1,300 CLUBS

Connect in the web's largest forums.
Blog about soccer from your point of view.
Shop 17,000 authentic soccer items.




On sale for $194.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $14.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Old 07 Aug 2002, 01:28 AM   #2
jmeissen0
BigSoccer Member++
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: page 1078
Default

because you answered it yourself... sponsor names... not logos
jmeissen0 is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 07:46 AM   #3
Footer Phooter
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Falls Church, VA
Default

Can someone give me one good reason why they're doing this?
Footer Phooter is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 08:05 AM   #4
jd2084
BigSoccer Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Rhode Island
Default

I don't really agree with FIFA doing this, but if they are trying to make the a decision in the name of good taste then it's the right one. MFL uniforms are starting to look more like NASCAR than soccer.
jd2084 is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 08:11 AM   #5
Topo
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Wheaton, MD
Default

I hope this means that the A-League team that has the Target symbols on their asses to advertise the store (Richmond, I think) can still have them.

Those are funny.
Topo is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 10:49 AM   #6
MetroDug
BigSoccer Member
 
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York, NY USA
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by jmeissen0
because you answered it yourself... sponsor names... not logos
hey, i must be too stupid to understand the difference betweem Chivas having CORONA or SOL plastererd on thier shorts and the Galaxy having BUD or'quakes havig YAHOO SPORTS.

would you be kind enough to enlighten me?
MetroDug is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 11:04 AM   #7
Native Aztexan
Is it 2010 yet?
 
Native Aztexan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Austin, Texas
Blog Entries: 1

Supporter: Austin Aztex U23, FC Dallas, Stoke City FC
Foe: Houston Dynamo, Chicago Fire
Default

I think it's bad that FIFA is telling MFL how to do their business and where to put their sponsors ads at (e.g. Leon). MFL and any other leagues needs all the sponsors they can get.
Quote:
Originally posted by Topo
I hope this means that the A-League team that has the Target symbols on their asses to advertise the store (Richmond, I think) can still have them.

Those are funny.
Maybe it's (Target symbols) there to show their opposition where to strike the ball at.
Native Aztexan is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 11:49 AM   #8
LMvCP
BigSoccer Moderator
 
LMvCP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Philadelphia
Blog Entries: 1

Supporter: Club América
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by cj90red
I think it's bad that FIFA is telling MFL how to do their business and where to put their sponsors ads at (e.g. Leon). MFL and any other leagues needs all the sponsors they can get.

I beg to differ. We are not hurting with sponsors.

I personally dont like it, but what bothers me more is the fact that FIFA is trying to tell us how to run our own domestic league.

Clubs are expected to lose anywhere from 30-40 million. The problem is, if FIFA pursues this, they may find themselves in a lawsuit. Grupo Modelo, Omnilife, Cemex, etc have contracts and they have already forked out the money. FIFA should take into consideration the contracts and wait until they expire.
LMvCP is online now   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 11:56 AM   #9
SoFla Metro
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Footer Phooter
Can someone give me one good reason why they're doing this?
So the players don't look like stock cars.
SoFla Metro is offline   Quote 
Old 07 Aug 2002, 12:11 PM   #10
kenntomasch
BigSoccer Member+++
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: El desierto

Supporter: West Ham United FC
Foe: Chelsea FC
Default

I agree that MFL teams (and have you ever seen Mexican baseball uniforms and their umpires?) do look like stock cars, but if it's the difference between having a league and not having a league (potentially), I think some folks need to learn to get used to a little commercialism unless they want strikers to make 10 pesos an hour.

Could hurt A-League teams. Many of them have short logos, don't they?
kenntomasch is offline   Quote 
Share

Reply

  Home > Forums > World of Soccer > Business and Media


On sale for $13.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $24.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Share
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump

World of Soccer
On The Pitch
Equipment & Gear
Soccer Store
England
Europe
USA
Americas
Asia, Oceania & Africa
Women's Soccer
Not Soccer Related
Customer Service







All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.



 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.