Quote:
Originally posted by DaMunk
I've got a few questions I hope you can help me answer:
Is an 'E' license necessary? I've read elsewhere that the 'D' course begins with a primer that pretty much covers the 'E' material. I understand there's a pregression of the materials, but will I be at a disadvantage having not taken the 'E' course?
|
The E and D licenses are administrated through the state office, while the C, B and A licenses are administrated through the national office. Thus, the quality of instruction and follow-up for E and D varies from state to state.
In any state, though, you should be able to apply for a waiver of the E provided you have certain levels of playing and coaching experience.
Some states, like Minnesota, do as others have indicated and use the first part of the D license as "review" of the E material. Thus, you often have some coaches taking parts of the E along with the D license candidates and then splitting off or finishing.
It is hard to tell if you will be at a disadvantage, because I don't know how much playing and/or coaching experience you have.
The main thing that you will get in either course is an introduction into the principles of coaching and planning as supported by the USSF. Those include an emphasis on using a progression of drills to isolate individual skills or game situations and building to a game situation; freezing a player/s to correct or praise that player/s' actions; and keeping as many players involved as possible (eliminating lines, sitting).
None of this is rocket science, nevertheless, I think it's worth the time and the money.
Final note on personal experience: My observation when I took the courses (they were offered jointly) was that the E course had more of the soccer moms and dads who wanted to learn how to coach their kids better and the D course had more former players/coaches of competitive teams.
This, of course, meant that the E participants were intimidated and reluctant to take part in the drills. So the two groups separated pretty quickly. This was a couple of years ago, so maybe they don't offer them jointly anymore.
But if there's a bias I've heard about the USSF courses (especially C and above), it's that they tend to be dominated by former players.
Hope this helps. If you have a decent knowledge of the game and you're anything more than ambulatory, I encourage you to take the D course. I think it's worth it.
jgw