Home > Soccer Forum > World of Soccer > Business and Media > TV, Satellite & Radio

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 20 Apr 2003, 08:58 AM   #1
geordienation
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Chicago

Supporter: DC United, FC Barcelona, Newcastle United FC
Default United vs. Fire telecast gaffe

In the grand scheme of things, showing the game as 1-0 for several minutes was a howler. I know the broadcasters are in L.A. and the restart was very confusing, but WOW was that bad.

At a minimum, a spotter at the stadium should be on the phone confirming that there was no goal. If you're going to do remote crews, then you've got to have somebody confirming that what you put on the screen is accurate. Period.

MLSNet had this on their event log: DC -50th Minute. Offside by 20-Eliseo Quintanilla.

That should set off a few alarms.
geordienation is offline   Quote 

TRY BIGSOCCER
NOW!
NEWS, SCORES & TABLES FOR 1,300 CLUBS

Connect in the web's largest forums.
Blog about soccer from your point of view.
Shop 17,000 authentic soccer items.




On sale for $7.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $24.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Old 20 Apr 2003, 12:02 PM   #2
anderson
BigSoccer Member+
 
anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002

Supporter: Houston Dynamo
Default

It was also pretty apparent from Marco's reaction (scowled at the linesman as he walked slowly back) and the lack of any goal celebration that the goal was probably offside.

Then again, I've also often heard Spanish-language announcers (esp. Pablo Ramirez) get well into their elongated goal call when it's obvious that the goal was called back for offside.
anderson is offline   Quote 
Old 20 Apr 2003, 02:41 PM   #3
Kryptonite
Guinness
 
Kryptonite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Columbus

Supporter: Columbus Crew, Columbus Crew, Columbus Crew
Foe: Chicago Fire, Toronto FC
Default Re: United vs. Fire telecast gaffe

Quote:
Originally posted by geordienation
At a minimum, a spotter at the stadium should be on the phone confirming that there was no goal
Paging Christian Miles... Paging Christian Miles...

Yeah, that was bad. But what do you expect when the TV announcers are ~3,000 miles away?
Kryptonite is offline   Quote 
Old 20 Apr 2003, 05:13 PM   #4
AndyMead
has a posse
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Seat 12A
Blog Entries: 74
Default

The factual errors or ambiguities bothered me. There were numerous mentions to DC's "first game" as opposed to "first home game". At one point Caligiuri even was making the point that it looked like Chicago was the team playing their first game instead of DC United.... I guess away games don't count.

At least I got some good camera time at the end of OT.
AndyMead is offline   Quote 
Old 21 Apr 2003, 01:52 PM   #5
SoFla Metro
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

The announcers made a number of errors, from confusing players (do Quaranta and Quintanilla even look remotely similar? Whitfield and Faria?)

And I know it's confusing when Hristo used to be on the team his current team is playing against, but he wasn't unavailable to the Fire due to suspension. He was unavailable to the Fire due to his being a United player.
SoFla Metro is offline   Quote 
Old 21 Apr 2003, 02:22 PM   #6
chayes
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Raleigh, NC
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by SoFla Metro
The announcers made a number of errors, from confusing players (do Quaranta and Quintanilla even look remotely similar? Whitfield and Faria?)
Don't you know, all white people think all ethnics look alike.

Salvadorans, Brazilians, blacks, Italians... all one in the same.

Only when they are blonde haired and blue eyed can they be distinguishable.
chayes is offline   Quote 
Old 21 Apr 2003, 03:05 PM   #7
AndyMead
has a posse
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Seat 12A
Blog Entries: 74
Default

I was also wondering about the product placement. I don't know if it was intentional or not, but it wasn't very well done. Cal started talking about the exciting young players in MLS and how he was reading about Freddy Adu in the latest issue of 90 Minutes magazine. Which struck me as odd since he didn't actually name any of the exciting young players in MLS, or seem to realize that Freddy Adu was not in the league.

If it was a product placement for 90 Minutes, then I would want my money back. If not, I want to know what Paul's address is so I can send him the latest issue of the ECG - especially since the next issue will have an interview with him in it...
AndyMead is offline   Quote 
Old 21 Apr 2003, 03:21 PM   #8
SoFla Metro
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by AndyMead
I was also wondering about the product placement. I don't know if it was intentional or not, but it wasn't very well done. Cal started talking about the exciting young players in MLS and how he was reading about Freddy Adu in the latest issue of 90 Minutes magazine. Which struck me as odd since he didn't actually name any of the exciting young players in MLS, or seem to realize that Freddy Adu was not in the league.

If it was a product placement for 90 Minutes, then I would want my money back. If not, I want to know what Paul's address is so I can send him the latest issue of the ECG - especially since the next issue will have an interview with him in it...
Now that's product placement, ladies and gentlemen!
SoFla Metro is offline   Quote 
Old 22 Apr 2003, 03:04 PM   #9
GoDC
BigSoccer Member++
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Hamilton, VA
Default Re: United vs. Fire telecast gaffe

Quote:
Originally posted by geordienation
In the grand scheme of things, showing the game as 1-0 for several minutes was a howler. I know the broadcasters are in L.A. and the restart was very confusing, but WOW was that bad.

At a minimum, a spotter at the stadium should be on the phone confirming that there was no goal. If you're going to do remote crews, then you've got to have somebody confirming that what you put on the screen is accurate. Period.

MLSNet had this on their event log: DC -50th Minute. Offside by 20-Eliseo Quintanilla.

That should set off a few alarms.
Of course the scoreboard at RFK had it as 1-0 for about 2 minutes!!!
GoDC is offline   Quote 
Old 22 Apr 2003, 04:30 PM   #10
AndyMead
has a posse
 
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Seat 12A
Blog Entries: 74
Default Re: Re: United vs. Fire telecast gaffe

Quote:
Originally posted by GoDC
Of course the scoreboard at RFK had it as 1-0 for about 2 minutes!!!
Not quite that long, but Mike Lastort did catch the scoreboard celebrating
AndyMead is offline   Quote 
Share

Reply

  Home > Forums > World of Soccer > Business and Media > TV, Satellite & Radio


On sale for $54.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $90.45
or buy soccer jerseys

Share
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump








All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:41 PM.



 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.