Home > Soccer Forum > Americas > Canada

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 24 Sep 2002, 09:05 PM   #1
DoyleG
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, CAN
Blog Entries: 7
Default Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

It was reported in the Edmonton Sun today that the city council here is planning to push ahead with plans for a $7 Million + indoor soccer facility.

Money that could be used to build an outdoor stadiums for pro soccer in this city is being wasted.

http://www.canoe.ca/EdmontonNews/es.es-09-24-0030.html
DoyleG is offline   Quote 

TRY BIGSOCCER
NOW!
NEWS, SCORES & TABLES FOR 1,300 CLUBS

Connect in the web's largest forums.
Blog about soccer from your point of view.
Shop 17,000 authentic soccer items.




On sale for $44.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $9.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Old 24 Sep 2002, 09:57 PM   #2
Daniel from Montréal
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Montréal
Thumbs down

Yeah, wasted on hundreds or thousands of kids who can now play the game year round?

What the fµck is that about?

Shlt, what Edmonton needs is a 20,000 seat stadium where NO ONE CAN FµCKING PLAY IN IT SEEING AS THERE IS NO PRO TEAM!
Daniel from Montréal is offline   Quote 
Old 28 Sep 2002, 08:59 PM   #3
JRedknapp11
BigSoccer Red Card
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: tsacademy.net
Default

Edmonton is one of the very few cities who happens to have an all grass stadium....the stadium isn't the issue....it's getting backers to fund a soccer team.
JRedknapp11 is offline   Quote 
Old 28 Sep 2002, 09:34 PM   #4
DoyleG
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, CAN
Blog Entries: 7
Default Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by JRedknapp11
Edmonton is one of the very few cities who happens to have an all grass stadium....the stadium isn't the issue....it's getting backers to fund a soccer team.
Commonwealth is far too big for a pro team in this city. The outdoor stadium inquestion would make up for when the city ripped apart Clarke stadium, which was a 20,000 seater.
DoyleG is offline   Quote 
Old 28 Sep 2002, 09:41 PM   #5
DoyleG
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, CAN
Blog Entries: 7
Default Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by Daniel from Montréal
Yeah, wasted on hundreds or thousands of kids who can now play the game year round?

What the fµck is that about?
We have plenty of indoor facilities in Edmonton for that. While we spend on that, the outdoor game here is suffering.


Quote:
Originally posted by Daniel from Montréal
Shlt, what Edmonton needs is a 20,000 seat stadium where NO ONE CAN FµCKING PLAY IN IT SEEING AS THERE IS NO PRO TEAM!
Other tenannts would be CJFL football, Rugby, and as well as an alternate concert venue to Commonwealth and Skyreach.
DoyleG is offline   Quote 
Old 30 Sep 2002, 01:22 AM   #6
Daniel from Montréal
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Montréal
Default Re: Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by DoyleG
Other tenannts would be CJFL football, Rugby, and as well as an alternate concert venue to Commonwealth and Skyreach.
Yeah, CJFL and Rugby are real cash-spinners from what I hear. And as your statement of "there are enough indoor facilities" (what's enough?) is there even a demand for an alternative concert venue. Think Think Think before you post the same stuff over and over.

PS: Just wasted my 700th post.
Daniel from Montréal is offline   Quote 
Old 30 Sep 2002, 02:20 AM   #7
DoyleG
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, CAN
Blog Entries: 7
Default Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by Daniel from Montréal


Yeah, CJFL and Rugby are real cash-spinners from what I hear. And as your statement of "there are enough indoor facilities" (what's enough?) is there even a demand for an alternative concert venue. Think Think Think before you post the same stuff over and over.

PS: Just wasted my 700th post.
Since when does making money matter at all. Having one home is a lot better than having the teams swap home fields constantly. It would also give rugby a decent home in this country, which it obviously lacks. And yes, in Edmonton their is a demand for an alternate concern venue as well.

We have two well stocked facilities in Edmonton plus a number outside the facility. It's more tha enough for indoor soccer in this city.
DoyleG is offline   Quote 
Old 30 Sep 2002, 03:59 AM   #8
Krammerhead
BigSoccer Member+
 
Krammerhead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: North Vancouver

Supporter: Vancouver Whitecaps, Leicester City FC
Foe: Toronto FC, Montreal Impact
Default Re: Re: Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by Daniel from Montréal


Yeah, CJFL and Rugby are real cash-spinners from what I hear. And as your statement of "there are enough indoor facilities" (what's enough?) is there even a demand for an alternative concert venue. Think Think Think before you post the same stuff over and over.

PS: Just wasted my 700th post.
Don't know the situation in Edmonton, but how would these indoor facilities be any bigger of a cash spinner than outdoors ones?
Krammerhead is offline   Quote 
Old 30 Sep 2002, 01:33 PM   #9
DoyleG
BigSoccer Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Edmonton, CAN
Blog Entries: 7
Default Re: Re: Re: Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by Krammerhead


Don't know the situation in Edmonton, but how would these indoor facilities be any bigger of a cash spinner than outdoors ones?
The plan for the proposed facility was first made several years back. One of the reasons it was initially dropped was because no need was seen for it. Even today the need is questionable.

As for an outdoor facility, it would help benfit soccer comapred to the poor-quality facilities that this city has.
DoyleG is offline   Quote 
Old 02 Oct 2002, 01:44 AM   #10
Daniel from Montréal
BigSoccer Member+
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Montréal
Default Re: Re: Re: Another example of misplaced priorities in soccer

Quote:
Originally posted by Krammerhead


Don't know the situation in Edmonton, but how would these indoor facilities be any bigger of a cash spinner than outdoors ones?
An indoor facility means play year round, in any weather and most of the time more than one game at a time. Also, it is accessible for many youth teams (I suppose, as that is how it's done here). When was the last time a U-13 girls tournament was played at Swangard, CCR or Varsity? ...

PS: Link doesn't work anymore.
Daniel from Montréal is offline   Quote 
Share

Reply

  Home > Forums > Americas > Canada


On sale for $17.99
at our soccer store

On sale for $7.99
or buy soccer jerseys

Share
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Forum Jump



World of Soccer
On The Pitch
Equipment & Gear
Soccer Store
England
Europe
USA
Americas
Asia, Oceania & Africa
Women's Soccer
Not Soccer Related
Customer Service







All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:45 PM.



 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.