Home > Blogs > Dan Loney Blog

BEAT ENGLAND

Share

Rate this Entry

"Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it

Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Facebook Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Yahoo! Buzz Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Digg Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Google Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to del.icio.us Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to StumbleUpon Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Furl Submit ""Two Teams, One Cup" is a cheap headline, and I will not stoop to use it" to Reddit
Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 03:30 PM by Dan Loney

You know what, there are some really interesting tidbits in this MLSnet preview. Whoever did it deserved more pub than "MLSnet staff." (Hopefully it wasn't the same guy who put a pick of Jhon Kennedy Hurtado up on the home page for this game; Kennedy was red-carded in the semifinal.)

Is anyone else the tiniest bit suspicious about the "We hate each other. Grrr." business from Hanauer and Payne leading up to this? I mean, maybe it's real, but it's also good publicity. And, while MLS is better than the NFL or WWE in admitting potentially embarrassing stuff on its own website, it's not like "Bakary Denis fistfight" turns up anything on from the search engine.

But however good a job MLSnet is doing for its USOC coverage, Josh is still the place to be. Even if Josh is in a different place now. It's thecup.us - as in, who does the Cup belong to? Us!

For example, thanks to the data on thecup.us, we learn that today, DC United is hoping to break an Open Cup record that has stood for eighty years. Can you guess what that record is?

"Duh, attendance in the final."

Well...yeah. There's no need to be a smartass about it.

The posted record for an Open Cup final, and I imagine an Open Cup game of any kind, is the suspiciously round number 20,000, set in April 1929, six months before the Crash. Hakoah All-Stars of Brooklyn were the home team, Madison Kennels of St. Louis were the jobbers - the All-Stars, loaded with former Austrian pros, Hebrew hammered the dog show 3-0 on the day, 5-0 aggregate.

Oh...yeah. They had two-leg finals in those days, so if DC United technically wants to set an attendance record, they'd need to draw 38,000.

Part of the reason that record has stood for eighty years was the Depression. Part of it was the Soccer War that split the big eastern leagues into twain, thrain and quatrain. Part of it was the NASL shunning the tournament. But for the last decade or so, the big reason that's still the record is the complacency of the USSF, and lack of motivation from MLS teams. A post-MLS Cup consolation match never drew, and now it seems midweek distraction matches have trouble drawing.

The Fire have come the closest, going over 18K in 1998 and 19K in 2000. If one is sufficiently suspicious about the 20,000 number, then one might think Chicago did set the record, and the record is only nine years old instead of eighty. If anyone out there has any idea how one goes about double-checking the gate receipts from Dexter Park in Brooklyn from the Jazz Age, then please inform.

Last year, DC United missed the record by a mere 11,000 fans or so - hey, it's better than a lot of hosts have done, even/especially in the MLS era. Still, unless DC either breaks 20K, or breaks the Sounders to the tune of 6-0, I'd expect claims that Seattle would have broken the record yesterday. In the afternoon. Before a Mariners game, or whatever. Doesn't really pass the smell test, but if the Sounders win tonight in front of 2,000 fans, expect an ear-shattering mixture of gloating and complaining.

DC is both trying and not trying to become the first team to win the Open Cup two years in a row while missing the MLS playoffs two years in a row. I mean, they want one but not the other. You know what I mean. If that does happen, Tom Soehn will almost certainly be fired after having won a trophy for DCU every single year of his employment.

By the way, that particular record is in serious jeopardy - Soehn ain't winning no Supporters Shield this year, and while anything can happen in MLS Cup playoffs, that can't. Especially if you don't get there.

DC is also trying to become the first team in 25 years or so to win the Cup back-to-back, which would also make Soehn's dismissal a bit brutal for us Open Cup fans. I mean...if it isn't even a Consolation Cup, then how do we justify the thing? At least the New York Pan-Cyprians acted happy to win the thing.

Oh, right, who's gonna win. I dunno. They're both two games over .500. DC's in a little more trouble playoff-wise but they did have an important win in Chicago. (Just like everyone else, but that's not the point - if DC had lost, they'd be in complete free fall right now.)

MLSnet tells me - well, all of us - that Tyrone Marshall is questionable. Marshall's prime is way, way back there in the distance, but he does tend to come up big in big games, and it's not like DC United is intimidating anyone this year.

So usually when I have no idea who's going to win a game like this, I pick out some random stat and infuse it with overarching importance. DC United hasn't lost at home this year in the league, Seattle is 2-4-5 on the road. You'd think that would be enough of a clue.

Although, in 2005, San Jose was invincible at home in MLS, their only loss in Spartan Stadium coming in...the Open Cup. Still, I think this is DC's night, 2-1.
Views 1621 Comments 21 Email Blog Entry

Share
Post a Comment Post a Comment
Total Comments 21

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    Reignking's Avatar
    And who knew the trophy was sponsored by a brand of scotch?
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 04:13 PM by Reignking Reignking is online now
  2. Old Comment
    As a fan of soccer in general I wish MLS teams and the media had a little more regard for the USOC. In my eyes, a trophy is a trophy. As a RBNY fan I'd be as thrilled for my team to be in this final as I was for last years MLS cup. Yes, I blame all this lack of excitement on the USSF. I would like them to really start selling this and making it big event. What's going on Labor day that there's nothing else on TV? I would that that it could be sold to a network or a time buy. Make it a goddamn event for chrissakes! There's nothing else like it in the US with the other team sports and it makes soccer more special to me than the other sports.
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 05:57 PM by gibroni gibroni is offline
  3. Old Comment
    I thought the record you were referring to would be "Most consecutive home Open Cup matches played". But I forgot, they already own that one.
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 07:32 PM by Crewster Crewster is offline
  4. Old Comment

    I know!

    I know a record that DC United will definitely break today:

    MOST OPEN CUP FINALS LOST TO SEATTLE.

    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 08:13 PM by irodrigo irodrigo is offline
  5. Old Comment
    tigersoccer2005's Avatar
    Whats the point of DC United winning the US Open Cup and earning a trip to CCL, if every year under Soehn they've thrown away their CCL opportunities. This year they're not even trying...
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 08:28 PM by tigersoccer2005 tigersoccer2005 is offline
  6. Old Comment
    It's over. Seattle wins (obviously). Thanks for playing, DC.
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 09:31 PM by testarazo testarazo is offline
  7. Old Comment
    Oh and let me be the first to humor Dan...

    If the final would have been in Seattle... we would have broken the attendance record, guaranteed.
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 09:47 PM by testarazo testarazo is offline
  8. Old Comment
    avocats's Avatar
    Seriously, Dan--I accept that Seattle made a lousy bid for the Open Cup, and that D.C.'s was better. That conceded, I have no doubt that we would have broken 30,000. In the afternoon. No matter what other team is in town. (Oh, BTW, we also would have allocated the opponents' supporters seats that had concession service during the game and no bird crap or weeds growing in the seats. Seriously, did they think that having the beer four ramps away from our seats would make a difference?)
    Posted 02 Sep 2009 at 11:39 PM by avocats avocats is offline
  9. Old Comment
    Sounders win FLAT OUT..

    DC had nothing
    Posted 03 Sep 2009 at 01:40 AM by BROSUF BROSUF is offline
  10. Old Comment
    Dan Loney's Avatar
    A little harsh to say they had nothing - even allowing for Bretos' sugar rush, that was an exciting finish. But Wicks - as the French say, quelle dumbass.
    Posted 03 Sep 2009 at 02:01 AM by Dan Loney Dan Loney is offline
Post a Comment Post a Comment
Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:45 PM.


 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.