Home > Blogs > Bill Archer Blog

Share

Rate this Entry

Tragedy in South Africa

Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Facebook Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Yahoo! Buzz Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Digg Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Google Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to del.icio.us Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to StumbleUpon Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Furl Submit "Tragedy in South Africa" to Reddit
Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 09:53 AM by Bill Archer
Updated 08 Jul 2008 at 10:40 AM by Bill Archer

With Euro 2008 behind us, the focus of world soccer is now shifting to the 2010 World Cup in South Africa. And what people are seeing is not giving anyone a warm, comfortable glow.

A year ago, FIFA Chief Poobah Sepp Blatter famously declared that "only God can prevent South Africa from hosting" the finals in 2010. He didn't provide any particulars, but the assumption was that Blatter was referring to, say, an earthquake or a tsunami and not simply a fit of pique, where the Lord wakes up one morning in a bad mood and says "Screw it".


Be that as it may, whenever Blatter has been questioned on the subject of whether there is a "Plan B" in case SA can't pull it off, his standard reply has always been "South Africa is Plan A, Plan B and Plan C".

This response apparently became inoperative last week when Blatter finally admitted that FIFA does now have a real, actual, in place "Plan B" prepared in case they need to move the thing someplace else.

Which, of course, has always been true. FIFA is a multi-billion dollar corporation, and the World Cup is their biggest - almost their only - money-producing venture. To march blandly (and blindly) into the future without some kind of contingency planning would be little short of lunacy.

Nevertheless, the response from South Africa was immediate and vehement: Blatter was "selling them out" in and "outrageous" piece of "bad faith".

Local organizing chairman Dr. Danny Jordaan, who is half of one of the great ventriloquist acts of all time (you can barely see Sepp Blatter's lips move) assured everyone that Blatter was simply referring to the aforementioned Heavenly intervention; who can argue with the fact that, should the Supreme Deity decide to chop SA off from the continent and set it adrift that FIFA needs to have a backup plan?

This explanation has done little to quell local fears that FIFA is getting ready to cut bait on SA, although one SA media outlet is suggesting that Blatter is "just trying to scare us" into getting their act in gear, and posting that it's actually a good thing.

Others aren't so sure. The problems in South Africa are very real and, incredibly, getting worse.

It does now appear that all of the stadiums will be more or less completed by the time the tournament rolls around, although there will undoubtedly be a good deal of damp plaster and still-tacky paint.

Of more concern is whether those buildings will have electrical power in a country which is experiencing massive unemployment because major industries cannot get the power they need to run their plants and mines.

Jordaan assures us that every stadium will have it's own backup generator so that in case the national power grid goes down the matches can go on.

Which will be great until the fans have to find their way home in the dark through one of the worst crime-infested countries on Earth, where - anti-immigrant rioting and murders aside - foreign hotel guests are routinely dragged out of their rooms, taken to the basement, beaten and raped.

The government has assured everyone that - astonishingly - crime won't be a problem in SA in two years because they're going to increase the size of their police forces by "10% each year" between now and then.

Cynics are suggesting that making an inefficient, corrupt, outnumbered and scared-to-death police force a little bigger by adding thousands of barely-trained, inexperienced rookies isn't likely to do anything much beyond making the problems worse.

It certainly isn't going to come anywhere close to the massive, ruthlessly efficient security forces South Korea deployed, the kind of intensely trained, highly motivated professionals who made visitors to that country feel safer than they did back home.

And that's to say nothing of the still-missing transportation, communications and hotel space that an event like this demands. They simply don't exist and are so far behind that few beyond the simply delusional are suggesting that they'll be in place in less than two years.

And now, looming ever larger, is the increasingly out-of-control political and humanitarian crisis is neighboring Zimbabwe, where Robert Mugabe's thugs are ruthlessly stamping out any form of dissent and causing human suffering on a massive scale.


South Africa has an enormous ability to affect events there, and the international community is increasingly upset with President Mbeki's compliance with, even complicity in, the tragedy unfolding just across his border.

Voices are now being raised against the Mbeki government itself, suggesting that if they refuse to use their influence to try and force Mugabe to act like something other than a slobbering murderer, that SA does not deserve to conduct the World Cup.

Finally, there are increasing voices in South Africa itself who are seeing the enormous expenditures of desperately needed monies on white elephant stadiums in a country where people are suffering and dying due to lack of basic human services and wondering whether the whole thing was a mistake in the first place.

Opponents of this view argue that South Korea built a bunch of basically useless stadiums as well, a point which ignores the fact that SK is a booming, successful economy that cold well afford it. South Africa cannot.

All of which brings us back to Sepp Blatter, whose insistence on an "African" World Cup was a payback for the African votes which won his re-election, as well as what he sees as a down payment on the Nobel Peace Prize which he has squarely in his sights.

Blatter is caught between a rock and a very, very hard place: pull the WC and be called the worst kind of racist, anti-African liar. Let it go on in an atmosphere of chaos and risk presiding over the wort calamity ever to befall world sport.

Either way, Blatter will wait until a minute before midnight to make his decision, and if it's pulled at the very last second - and we're talking referees with whistles and national anthems here - then the only possible alternative will be a country that can literally flip the switch overnight and pull off an event of this size.

There's only one country on Earth that can do that, and it's the USA.
Posted in Uncategorized
Views 3795 Comments 50 Email Blog Entry

Share
Post a Comment Post a Comment
Total Comments 50

Comments

  1. Old Comment
    The US certainly has the means to do it, but it still takes a year or so to get all the planning and logistics nailed down. Sepp will have to make a go/no-go decision before the end of this year.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 10:28 AM by Claymore Claymore is offline
  2. Old Comment
    110toyourleft's Avatar
    Quote:
    It does now appear that all of the stadiums will be more or less completed by the time the tournament rolls around, although there will undoubtedly be a good deal of damp plaster and still-tacky paint.
    Are there enough stadia for the confederations cup thats kicks off in 11 months?
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 10:41 AM by 110toyourleft 110toyourleft is offline
  3. Old Comment
    Ghermez's Avatar
    There is only one country on Earth that can do that, and that is GERMANY
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 10:41 AM by Ghermez Ghermez is offline
  4. Old Comment
    I would guess England and perhaps Spain could pull it off as well.

    The Confederations Cup only has, what, 8 teams so you don't need so many stadia to run it.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 10:56 AM by GlennAA11 GlennAA11 is offline
  5. Old Comment
    Actually, Blatter has always admitted to having a Plan B in case of a natural disaster. This is nothing new.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:00 AM by evangel evangel is offline
  6. Old Comment
    metros11's Avatar
    Germany is very unlikely. It would either be USA or England.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:03 AM by metros11 metros11 is offline
  7. Old Comment
    ENGLAND was mentioned as a back-up to SA, and i think they might even consider the US. Germany will not get the WC again. Spain might be another choice.

    I wouldn't be surprised they pull the plug before the confederation CUP. SA has too many issues that cannot be solved within the course of 2 yrs. It would be a bad publicity if during the games, some of the fans become victims of crime. Blatter needs to wake-up and realize the reality of the situation.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:05 AM by stingbee30 stingbee30 is offline
  8. Old Comment
    BokenTerp's Avatar

    The New Giants Stadium

    As a point of reference, this is what a stadium should like at this moment, that needs to be ready by August 2010:

    http://www.nyg2010.com/cam.html
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:12 AM by BokenTerp BokenTerp is online now
  9. Old Comment
    Mexico could probably handle it as well, though they wouldn't be the first choice since they've already had the World Cup twice.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:15 AM by evangel evangel is offline
  10. Old Comment
    Truth of the matter is that the US could host a World Cup right now using stadia all larger than 65K and none of which were used for the 1994 Cup. Without building a thing.
    Posted 08 Jul 2008 at 11:18 AM by kgilbert78 kgilbert78 is online now
Post a Comment Post a Comment
Total Trackbacks 0

Trackbacks


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:41 PM.


 

Copyright © 2009 Big Internet Group, LLC. All rights reserved. PRIVACY POLICY. TERMS OF USE.
The BigSoccer name and logo and 'Share the Passion!' are service marks of Big Internet Group, LLC.
The BIG Network: Soccer | Aussie Rules Football | Travel | Cricket | Lacrosse | Music
Views expressed by the bloggers and users of BigSoccer do not represent the views of Big Internet Group, LLC.