ChrisB
11 Apr 2009, 01:05 PM
Twenty per cent said they would support Lansdowne, compared to 16% for the Kanata stadium. Nearly a third (29%) said the city should help fund both proposals, while 31% said the city shouldn't contribute to either project.
However, when asked to choose between the two stadium proposals, most selected Lansdowne (58%) over Kanata (32%). Seven per cent had no preference. ...
The poll found about an equal number of Ottawans would likely attend CFL games at Lansdowne (32%) and MLS games in Kanata (31%) on a regular basis. The poll is based on 501 telephone interviews between April 4 and 7, and is accurate to within 4.4 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
While a third of Ottawans say the city should help fund both stadiums, it remains uncertain if the city will help pay for either.
http://www.ottawasun.com/News/OttawaAndRegion/2009/04/11/9080671-sun.html
However, when asked to choose between the two stadium proposals, most selected Lansdowne (58%) over Kanata (32%). Seven per cent had no preference. ...
The poll found about an equal number of Ottawans would likely attend CFL games at Lansdowne (32%) and MLS games in Kanata (31%) on a regular basis. The poll is based on 501 telephone interviews between April 4 and 7, and is accurate to within 4.4 percentage points, 19 times out of 20.
While a third of Ottawans say the city should help fund both stadiums, it remains uncertain if the city will help pay for either.
http://www.ottawasun.com/News/OttawaAndRegion/2009/04/11/9080671-sun.html