AAGunner3
19 Feb 2004, 11:27 AM
In the Washington Times' article, "Two New Problems for ACC" ( http://www.washtimes.com/sports/20040218-115932-8423r.htm ) Mr. Daly says the following regarding problems the ACC may face adding VaTech and Miami to their league. At the end of the article:
Williams' boosters are saying the kid deserves a 12th chance. He hasn't stolen anything, they argue, in 18 whole months, when he ripped off $3,800 worth of stereo equipment. The university is mulling its options and, if it's smart, counting the silverware. Vick's attorneys, meanwhile, undoubtedly plan to offer the Freddy Adu Defense. (I have no idea what that means, it just sounded funny.)
If he has no idea what it means, why put it there other than to possibly slander Mr. Adu and/or bash soccer? Or is there something I am not aware of regarding the criminal history of Freddy Adu?
Williams' boosters are saying the kid deserves a 12th chance. He hasn't stolen anything, they argue, in 18 whole months, when he ripped off $3,800 worth of stereo equipment. The university is mulling its options and, if it's smart, counting the silverware. Vick's attorneys, meanwhile, undoubtedly plan to offer the Freddy Adu Defense. (I have no idea what that means, it just sounded funny.)
If he has no idea what it means, why put it there other than to possibly slander Mr. Adu and/or bash soccer? Or is there something I am not aware of regarding the criminal history of Freddy Adu?