beineke
27 Dec 2003, 10:05 AM
In other discussions, PK's have been coming up ... I figure they might as well have their own thread. For now, here's a bit of info ...
1999
PK Attempts: 45
PK Misses (not saved): 4
% Missed: 8.9
2000
PK Attempts: 72
PK Misses (not saved): 9
% Missed: 12.5
2001
PK Attempts: 54
PK Misses (not saved): 3
% Missed: 5.6
2002
PK Attempts: 51
PK Misses (not saved): 1
% Missed: 2.0
2003
PK Attempts: 60
PK Misses (not saved): 0 *
% Missed: 0.0 *
It's an encouraging trend that today's penalty-takers have been less likely to shank it. This also appears to explain why PK conversion percentages have risen.
* The numbers above include both regular season and playoff PK's. In the League Stats section on mlsnet.com, they began to break down PK numbers in 1999. From 99-02, they included some details about the cause of the PK, i.e. who drew the foul, who committed it. In 03, they abandoned some of that info ... let's hope they bring it back. All 2003 pk's were coded as "G" or "S," but I'm assuming that a missed PK would be coded "M," or some such thinig.
1999
PK Attempts: 45
PK Misses (not saved): 4
% Missed: 8.9
2000
PK Attempts: 72
PK Misses (not saved): 9
% Missed: 12.5
2001
PK Attempts: 54
PK Misses (not saved): 3
% Missed: 5.6
2002
PK Attempts: 51
PK Misses (not saved): 1
% Missed: 2.0
2003
PK Attempts: 60
PK Misses (not saved): 0 *
% Missed: 0.0 *
It's an encouraging trend that today's penalty-takers have been less likely to shank it. This also appears to explain why PK conversion percentages have risen.
* The numbers above include both regular season and playoff PK's. In the League Stats section on mlsnet.com, they began to break down PK numbers in 1999. From 99-02, they included some details about the cause of the PK, i.e. who drew the foul, who committed it. In 03, they abandoned some of that info ... let's hope they bring it back. All 2003 pk's were coded as "G" or "S," but I'm assuming that a missed PK would be coded "M," or some such thinig.