beineke
27 Nov 2003, 01:17 PM
Squad lists are here
http://images.fifa.com/u20/2003/WYC_2003_sl-latest.xls
A few notes...
Convey is the only player with more than 6 senior caps, and he has a whopping 18.
At 210 pounds, the US's Knox Cameron is listed ~10 pounds heavier than any other player at the tournament.
The shortest player is Panama's Rodrigo Tello, at 5'1.
Canada has six players in US colleges, the US has nine. In total, Canada has players who are based in eight different countries, the most of any team.
I counted 246 players with birthdates in 1983, 173 born in 84, 41 in 85, 16 in 86, 2 in 87, and 1 in 89.
(I must have missed someone.)
------------------------------
Birthdates by Month
------------------------------
Jan 69
Feb 57
Mar 47
Apr 48
May 49
Jun 33
Jul 33
Aug 39
Sep 34
Oct 28
Nov 26
Dec 17
So we've got two phenomena:
(1) As a whole, the kids born in 1984 have almost caught up to the kids born in 1983.
(2) The kids born late in the year have not caught up to the kids born early in the year.
Taken in combination, these two effects are clear evidence of institutional bias in favor of kids who were born early in the year.
http://images.fifa.com/u20/2003/WYC_2003_sl-latest.xls
A few notes...
Convey is the only player with more than 6 senior caps, and he has a whopping 18.
At 210 pounds, the US's Knox Cameron is listed ~10 pounds heavier than any other player at the tournament.
The shortest player is Panama's Rodrigo Tello, at 5'1.
Canada has six players in US colleges, the US has nine. In total, Canada has players who are based in eight different countries, the most of any team.
I counted 246 players with birthdates in 1983, 173 born in 84, 41 in 85, 16 in 86, 2 in 87, and 1 in 89.
(I must have missed someone.)
------------------------------
Birthdates by Month
------------------------------
Jan 69
Feb 57
Mar 47
Apr 48
May 49
Jun 33
Jul 33
Aug 39
Sep 34
Oct 28
Nov 26
Dec 17
So we've got two phenomena:
(1) As a whole, the kids born in 1984 have almost caught up to the kids born in 1983.
(2) The kids born late in the year have not caught up to the kids born early in the year.
Taken in combination, these two effects are clear evidence of institutional bias in favor of kids who were born early in the year.