haven
11 Nov 2003, 08:04 PM
I've noticed that many of Utd's opponents get their best chances by attacking our defensive throw-ins. It seems very rare that Utd actually build possession after a defensive throw-in.
However, Utd often completely surrender defensive throw-ins by the other team, or bring only token pressure (just Ruud and maybe the AMC). Giving them a free ride seems like a mistake to me, especially when it pays dividents for the other side fairly frequently.
Good teams like Arsenal and Newcastle regularly pressure defensive throw-ins with success. Liverpool generated their best chance of the 1st half by pressuring a defensive throw-in in the last game.
Why does SAF do this?
However, Utd often completely surrender defensive throw-ins by the other team, or bring only token pressure (just Ruud and maybe the AMC). Giving them a free ride seems like a mistake to me, especially when it pays dividents for the other side fairly frequently.
Good teams like Arsenal and Newcastle regularly pressure defensive throw-ins with success. Liverpool generated their best chance of the 1st half by pressuring a defensive throw-in in the last game.
Why does SAF do this?