Goff Chat: Nov. 7th at 2:30 p.m

[sch2383]

Submitt questions here:

http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/zforum/03/submit_sp_sports_goff110703.htm

[Knave]

A link to the chat itself: http://discuss.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/zforum/03/sp_sports_goff110703.htm

[fatbastard]

Interesting chat - a few great lines in there too! "you deserve your money back" and the nod to Hristo maybe having some laying around was good, but my favorite had to be:
"Beckham? Does he play for Colorado?"

Very honest opinionating, thanx Mr. Goff for a deeper-than-your-stories-can-be chat.

[superdave]

His answer to my question about the team losing its concentration over a call implies that Ray doesn't do anything to correct the problem.

Which I suspected was the case.

[JoeW]

When you keep in mind that Goff can't afford to completely open up (players talk confidentially under promise that info not be revealed, staff talk about what they're thinking about but a decision hasn't been made yet, hints get dropped), SG was very up front and informative. Specific comments about how the team whines/gets distracted by refs, that a decision on Hudson hasn't been made (but alluding to the fact that both sides aren't exactly in love with each other), frank comments about players--all of that is probably about as specific as he could be. Good job SG.

[Jose L. Couso]

Originally posted by JoeW
When you keep in mind that Goff can't afford to completely open up (players talk confidentially under promise that info not be revealed, staff talk about what they're thinking about but a decision hasn't been made yet, hints get dropped), SG was very up front and informative. Specific comments about how the team whines/gets distracted by refs, that a decision on Hudson hasn't been made (but alluding to the fact that both sides aren't exactly in love with each other), frank comments about players--all of that is probably about as specific as he could be. Good job SG.

What he said.