View Full Version : Clint Mathis for DCU
MarioKempes
04 Nov 2003, 06:48 PM
All Cletus needs is a new environment. And we are now the bad boys of MLS, so he will fit in. Clint will provide the goals we need next year.
Jose L. Couso
04 Nov 2003, 06:50 PM
So, who do you trade for him?
greatscott
04 Nov 2003, 06:54 PM
Originally posted by MarioKempes
All Cletus needs is a new environment. And we are now the bad boys of MLS, so he will fit in. Clint will provide the goals we need next year.
leave him in the swamp. i dont want him
Funkfoot
04 Nov 2003, 06:55 PM
Originally posted by Jose L. Couso
So, who do you trade for him?
Etcheverry, Stoitchkov, Ivanov, Barclay, Alegria, Carroll, Perea. All of 'em. If need be, throw in Warren's new brother-in-law and a couple of towel boys.
MarioKempes
04 Nov 2003, 07:02 PM
Etch and Marco will be gone next year. We will be well under the salary cap. I dunno who we trade.
Sanguine
04 Nov 2003, 07:03 PM
Originally posted by MarioKempes
Etch and Marco will be gone next year. We will be well under the salary cap. I dunno who we trade.
Etch and Marco huh? He counts twice?
MikeLastort2
04 Nov 2003, 07:04 PM
Originally posted by MarioKempes
Etch and Marco will be gone next year. We will be well under the salary cap. I dunno who we trade.
Etch and Marco are the same person.
Treetaliano
04 Nov 2003, 07:28 PM
so, um yeah....i'm pretty sure he meant Stoich...
"typo smack" is pretty weak....
Sanguine
04 Nov 2003, 07:30 PM
Originally posted by Treetaliano
so, um yeah....i'm pretty sure he meant Stoich...
"typo smack" is pretty weak....
Stoitch is only making 50k a year.
doneshufflin
04 Nov 2003, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by Treetaliano
so, um yeah....i'm pretty sure he meant Stoich...
"typo smack" is pretty weak....
This post is pretty weak.
bofahey
04 Nov 2003, 07:45 PM
If the Mutts would seriously consider Mathis, it would definitely take at least either Kovalenko, Nelsen, Petke, Namoff, Olsen, Convey, Reyes, Stewart or an allocation.
Despite the fact that they specialize in waste management up there, there's no way they would take some combination of Ivanov, Marco, Hristo, Cerritos, Q1, Cheyo, Chino, Barclay, Stokes, Carroll.
JMMUSA8
04 Nov 2003, 07:47 PM
I think the question is who are you willing to give up to satisfy the Mutts into trading Mathis. The only player that comes to my mind is Convey. One Nat player for another Nat player, unless you got a good forward.
g bugout
04 Nov 2003, 07:48 PM
Originally posted by bofahey
If the Mutts would seriously consider Mathis, it would definitely take at least either Kovalenko, Nelsen, Petke, Namoff, Olsen, Convey, Reyes, Stewart or an allocation.
Despite the fact that they specialize in waste management up there, there's no way they would take some combination of Ivanov, Marco, Hristo, Cerritos, Q1, Cheyo, Chino, Barclay, Stokes, Carroll.
Eskandarian.
bofahey
04 Nov 2003, 07:53 PM
Originally posted by g bugout
Eskandarian.
Forgot Esky... but I think he would just be a throw in at this point. No way they trade Mathis straight-up for a bust #1 pick who is too short, slow and uncreative to ever be an impact player in this league.
sch2383
04 Nov 2003, 08:04 PM
Since his contract is up, do we have to give something up to get him? If he resigns with the MLS, couldn't he stipulate in his contract that he go to DC (if he wanted to), since he seems to be done in New York.
Sofia
04 Nov 2003, 08:05 PM
I might have to give up my season tickets if Mathis comes to DC. Don't like him- don't want him. Perish the thought. I thought we were trying to improve the attitude/work ethic. He had a new coach this year shouldn't that have contributed greatly to a new environment?
topcow
04 Nov 2003, 08:09 PM
Adu!
Barbara
04 Nov 2003, 08:18 PM
Originally posted by Sofia
I might have to give up my season tickets if Mathis comes to DC. Don't like him- don't want him. Perish the thought. I thought we were trying to improve the attitude/work ethic. He had a new coach this year shouldn't that have contributed greatly to a new environment?
Can you imagine if Etch and Marco (;)) are back next year AND we have the worthless Mathis?
Now that would be a train wreck I'd pay to see.
galperin
04 Nov 2003, 08:36 PM
We do not need Cletus. We need someone like Twellmen, but we'll never get him. We'd have to give up too much.
DoctorD
04 Nov 2003, 08:42 PM
Originally posted by BarbDett
Can you imagine if Etch and Marco (;)) are back next year AND we have the worthless Mathis?
Now that would be a train wreck I'd pay to see.
We'd have two forwards who like to play midfield and a midfileder who wants to play back. Ladies and gentlemen, I give you the 5-5-0 formation.