Beasley still lacking in some basics...

[Eliezar]

And who is MM10 shirt?

And, I wonder if there are any posts around with my old log in name!

[superdave]

sfs is an ex-pat from an Iron Curtain nation...I don't know which one. Probably one that values bitterness and anger.

[peledre]

sfs is an ex-pat from an Iron Curtain nation...I don't know which one. Probably one that values bitterness and anger.

Spurnedmanistan?

[Nutmeg]

if jri = golazo and golazo hates freddy adu (just read every freddy thread this year on him), but jri loves every US player then either

That would actually help explain the name change. jri was a lunatic Freddy hyper before. A reincarnation is much easier than an admission of error.

[giffenbone]

That would actually help explain the name change. jri was a lunatic Freddy hyper before. A reincarnation is much easier than an admission of error.

that would be option (iv)...which actually makes sense

i still prefer option (iii) = i'm drunk and it makes no sense.

[Craig P]

I'm not sure that it's a fruitful endeavor to attempt to connect one incarnation of a poster to another. It tends to lead to ad hominem reasoning and judgement, instead of focusing on what they're actually saying.

[peledre]

That would actually help explain the name change. jri was a lunatic Freddy hyper before. A reincarnation is much easier than an admission of error.

I wonder if he and Drsmoo got together and decided to turn the cold shoulder to Freddy.

[Easy Morning Rebel]

sfs is an ex-pat from an Iron Curtain nation...I don't know which one. Probably one that values bitterness and anger.

Does that rule any of them out?

[Nutmeg]

I'm not sure that it's a fruitful endeavor to attempt to connect one incarnation of a poster to another. It tends to lead to ad hominem reasoning and judgement, instead of focusing on what they're actually saying.

Depends on the fruit you're after. If it's intelligent discussion, maybe not. If it's knowing which posters are reinventing themselves because their previous incarnation posted itself into irrelevance so that you can add those posters to your IL to keep the noise down, it is helpful. If it's just speculation drawing lines to moronic posters who ignore facts to rehash their arguments 15 times a day to moronic columnists who ignore facts to rehash their arguments once a month, that's just fun fruit.

[Eliezar]

Depends on the fruit you're after. If it's intelligent discussion, maybe not. If it's knowing which posters are reinventing themselves because their previous incarnation posted itself into irrelevance so that you can add those posters to your IL to keep the noise down, it is helpful. If it's just speculation drawing lines to moronic posters who ignore facts to rehash their arguments 15 times a day to moronic columnists who ignore facts to rehash their arguments once a month, that's just fun fruit.

Ever kick anybody out of your car on the freeway before?!?

[BS Troll Hunter]

Golazo68 is JRI

They are the only two posters in the history of BigSoccer who have posted on the advantages of actually not watching games.

Read'em and weap...errr... laugh

http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showpost.php?p=10953669&postcount=34


I had already answered my opinion (viewing him), and wanted to address the question at hand (Actim/independent accounts of performance).

But I also think 'circumstantial' evidence is as strong and even stronger than 'eye witness accounts' in many cases. I'm not into this BS tenant, "I SAW him, therefore.....". I've met too many posters who don't know soccer use this to their advantage, when the evidence argues otherwise.

Seeing is not necessarily believing.








"I have an elephant's brain" :D

[Tonerl]

Ever kick anybody out of your car on the freeway before?!?

I guess if he doesn't respond you'll know you're on his ignore list. :)

[Tonerl]

I'm not sure that it's a fruitful endeavor to attempt to connect one incarnation of a poster to another. It tends to lead to ad hominem reasoning and judgement, instead of focusing on what they're actually saying.

Especially if you happen to be wrong about the poster's identity.

I mean, ad hominem arguments are reasonably logical (though not syllogistic) if you have an understanding of the person's larger philosophy and you limit yourself to argumentum ad hominem circumstantiae or argumentum ad hominem tu quoque, for example. But if you are wrong about the other poster's own philosophy on a subject (which this kind of speculation leads to), then you really just end up looking foolish.

[sidefootsitter]

is jri actually sidefootsitter? i just realized that.... :confused: :rolleyes:

is sidefootsitter really Jamie Treker?

That would be interesting... How many rolleyes am I allowed here?

Oh, and Trecker gets paid to write about soccer. I, unfortunately...