PDA

View Full Version : DestroyerDomingo- Flying without tailwings


DestroyerDaMarc
12 Feb 2008, 02:02 PM
Hey Big Soccer readers, writers, and bloggers. I've been a long time poster and believe that the best way to blog is to post on the main website, and recieve conjecture back from you the reader. The blog is an archieve for my work and not the main avenue, no the main thruway for my opinons and analysis but more specifically the USMNT.

Yes I could go on and on about Top Oss, or Wisla Krakow, dare me to speak about HJK, or if you want me to be bold Barnet is always an option. But for me and my opinons and beliefs the only team I support through the mud of trouble and the sands of hope is the USMNT.

But with that love and nuturing, like any good parent or fan; their is always room for conjecture; for criticism. This weekly blog that will come out every Sunday barring no internet or a vacation represents what I feel as a fan I need to point out and after the Mexico game which shook more heads then a Night at the Roxbury, there is no more gaping hole in the US then the depth or lack of at the wings.

This past game proved to us here at BS that Bob Bradley's empty bucket begins with good strong wing play. Without them, the ball becomes a stagnant elevator moving up and down across the pitch's width. When this happens the opposing team has an edge as the pattern continues this way looking for that magical run at the goal.

In the international game a winger's mindset should be defend first, attack as a thrid option Moore did this well but Corrales was moving too far up on some of the plays. Even more unbelievable is Corrales being as slow as a horse in quicksand, didn't contest crosses and was too far involved in the attack not supporting almost costing us on the fast counters. In the second half when we buttoned the hatch he added nothing and has a least two or three fouls to his name.

Corrales' day should of ended against a Swedish "B" side where he added nothing to the game defensively. He is one of thoes 110% on the practice field, but is out of sorts during the game. There's a reason he's leaving a Norwegian winning side and its not lack of quality in the league. His play is the mark of why we need a deffensive minded Pearce in their because he does what a winger is supposed to do, support the play. Bob not bringing him in adds to the shroud surronding his attitude but also the idea that Heath is too defensive.

On the right side we saw that Drew Moore is a life MLSer. We saw that unless a Bundesliga 3 team wants him in the comming years its going to be ok for Hoop fans to buy his number and not worry about him going anywhere. Drew was a solid benchmark for offense but that doesn't make up too inexcusible goals that with proper marking should not of happened.

For me anyway he showed us why that when Dolo is out, we are ruing at right back. Spector is one option but BB likes him on the left, Simek is hurt and Wynne is a U-23. RB is a Depth Charts nightmare as you have three solid guys and the rest are aby bismal.

I think for me and this formation, we need backs who can fit into it and well we have few who play at a high enough level to compete against Mexico. Until we have a world class lineup don't put in a MLS guy and a benched Norwegian player because it doesn't help us out when it comes down to protecting the lead which is what we should of done.

But just curious about the feedback.

mcnaulty21
12 Feb 2008, 07:12 PM
You completely forgot about Hejduk

DestroyerDaMarc
13 Feb 2008, 10:37 AM
You completely forgot about Hejduk

I feel that Frankie as well as anyone who will be 33+ by the next World Cup can officially say that their playing career with the nats is over. Frankie's inclusion in the Gold Cup was a move that luckily payed off, but if your not going to have the confidence in the younger guys then their's no point playing all these frendlies as your not building towards the future your laying your hope on the foundations of the past and just ask Bruce how that worked out.

mcnaulty21
13 Feb 2008, 04:21 PM
I feel that Frankie as well as anyone who will be 33+ by the next World Cup can officially say that their playing career with the nats is over. Frankie's inclusion in the Gold Cup was a move that luckily payed off, but if your not going to have the confidence in the younger guys then their's no point playing all these frendlies as your not building towards the future your laying your hope on the foundations of the past and just ask Bruce how that worked out.True, he won't be there in 2010. But you also said that "RB is a Depth Charts nightmare as you have three solid guys and the rest are aby bismal [sic]." If we are in such dire straits, why not use a vet who has proven himself more that capable until others step up to fill his spot. Until Frankie proves himself to have lost it, I put him either 2nd or 3rd on the depth chart, Simek being the other option. With Simek being injured right now (I believe he's still out), Frankie is still needed.

DestroyerDaMarc
13 Feb 2008, 11:51 PM
True, he won't be there in 2010. But you also said that "RB is a Depth Charts nightmare as you have three solid guys and the rest are aby bismal [sic]." If we are in such dire straits, why not use a vet who has proven himself more that capable until others step up to fill his spot. Until Frankie proves himself to have lost it, I put him either 2nd or 3rd on the depth chart, Simek being the other option. With Simek being injured right now (I believe he's still out), Frankie is still needed.

For me anyway I think the chart reads as follows with Simek out, Dolo is the obvious number one with Spector at two and a surprise at three, I'd like to see Parkhurst here. With the big bad guys in the center Parkhurst on the wings internationally makes a lot of sense.

mcnaulty21
13 Feb 2008, 11:58 PM
For me anyway I think the chart reads as follows with Simek out, Dolo is the obvious number one with Spector at two and a surprise at three, I'd like to see Parkhurst here. With the big bad guys in the center Parkhurst on the wings internationally makes a lot of sense.Against Euro teams, I might prefer Spector to Hejduk, but I think against CONCACAF sides, I'd take Frakie.

It's all a matter of opinion at this point. I wouldn't mind seeing Spector on the right, wouldn't mind Frankie on the right.

Parkhurst, I don't know. Has he played there with the Revs at all? Don't they typically play a 3-man backline?

passtheblizz
14 Feb 2008, 12:38 AM
Frankie is a robot and does not age like normal human beings... If he is healthy, which is a big question mark, I think he may book a trip to SA. He isn't a great player, but he is going up against a bunch of guys with almost no real international experience (not counting Dolo, who is #1). If he can contribute in qualifying I could see him making it all the way through. I honestly think that if he had been able to play vs Mexico we might have won. Drew Moor's man marking was terrible on the second goal, while Frankie would have been all over that guy. The assist doesn't make up for Moor's horrible defense on set plays.

DestroyerDaMarc
14 Feb 2008, 02:20 PM
Parkhurst, I don't know. Has he played there with the Revs at all? Don't they typically play a 3-man backline?

Yes they do and no he hasn't, however I feel that he can naturally be slotted to play in that part of the field. To me I think its dangerous if he plays in central defense due to his height disadvantage, however on the wing I feel this would negate it.

Frankie is a robot and does not age like normal human beings... If he is healthy, which is a big question mark, I think he may book a trip to SA. He isn't a great player, but he is going up against a bunch of guys with almost no real international experience (not counting Dolo, who is #1). If he can contribute in qualifying I could see him making it all the way through. I honestly think that if he had been able to play vs Mexico we might have won. Drew Moor's man marking was terrible on the second goal, while Frankie would have been all over that guy. The assist doesn't make up for Moor's horrible defense on set plays.

See the problem is though the health issues, for us all especially at left back this could be a huge problem and to me it makes no sense to have a guy who's known not to be healthy come World Cup time be in the back. For me until this year Simek could of been a starter, but well that was before his horrendous injury plagued season.

mcnaulty21
14 Feb 2008, 06:26 PM
Yes they do and no he hasn't, however I feel that he can naturally be slotted to play in that part of the field. To me I think its dangerous if he plays in central defense due to his height disadvantage, however on the wing I feel this would negate it.One more thing, does he have the pace to play there? Or would it be a non-factor?

DestroyerDaMarc
15 Feb 2008, 09:30 AM
One more thing, does he have the pace to play there? Or would it be a non-factor?

I'd say he could stay with most players, the super fast ones are the ones we have a hard time staying with but most in our region Parkhurst could stay with.