PDA

View Full Version : St. Louis Should be Successful Mid-Size Exception for MLS


Angus Podgorney
06 Sep 2007, 10:52 PM
Article from ussoccerplayers.com about viability of St. Louis bid.

St. Louis Should Be Successful Mid-Size Exception for MLS
09/06/2007 9:59 AM
By Kevin McGeehan

WASHINGTON DC (September 6, 2007) USSoccerPlayers -- In principle, I’m opposed to any additional Major League Soccer expansion in mid-size cities. The American game is at its strongest in a handful of major cities around the league, such as Washington, Toronto and Los Angeles. It should be a similar story in Chicago and North Jersey when the ownership and roster situations there stabilize. MLS must succeed in those cities for the league to grow.

There was an idea for a time that MLS might succeed in smaller cities where the attention of loyal fans isn’t distracted by more established or successful teams -- the long-promised MLS version of the Green Bay Packers. At Lamar Hunt’s urging, we ended up with teams in Kansas City and Columbus, and almost had teams in San Antonio and Cleveland. Not exactly Green Bay in terms of size, but not exactly first choice for any league with a dozen potential markets.

The problem is that cities like those require hands-on owners who are interested in spending money to promote and improve their clubs, and for a long time those teams floundered for a lack of such owners. Few things are worse than New York playing in front of friends and family at the Meadowlands, except the Wizards playing in front of the same at a minor league baseball stadium next year. The last thing the league needs is another club toiling away in anonymous mediocrity in the Midwest.

Serious fans of the game know all about St. Louis’ soccer history. Nearly half of the players in the United States team that upset England in the 1950 World Cup were recruited from St. Louis. St. Louis University has a rich tradition in college soccer, and the city was host to numerous international games before US soccer hit the big time following the 1994 World Cup. The city’s place in the game has never been in doubt, and if the world were fair, it’s where the Wizards would have been located from the start.

The ownership group seems to get it, though. Many of the new and potential owners that have come to MLS in the past three years have been real estate developers with a tangential interest in soccer. Some of them have picked up an interest in the game, as in Washington, but they’re not absorbing the losses that the league hands them for the good of the game. They’re here for the money.

Jeff Cooper and his St. Louis Soccer United group don’t seem like that sort of crowd. Sure, the city’s proposed $406 million soccer complex will include retail and community development, but what soccer-specific stadium could get built without these sweeteners attached to it? The important thing is that Cooper himself played soccer through college, and presumably understands the importance of the game in the city.

Cooper holds a seat on the board at Brentford Football Club, who play in England’s fourth division (League 2). In 1996, Brentford was bought out by Bees United, the club’s supporters’ trust. If Cooper can take some of the lessons that he’s learned about fan involvement at Brentford and transfer them to St. Louis, he’ll be ahead of many of the league’s established clubs. Cooper has followed Peter Wilt’s lead and reached out to the potential fans in St. Louis through the group’s website, so he’s off to a good start.

It can’t be all peaches and cream, though, and there are some potential problems ahead for St. Louis United. This is a market that lost an NASL team to Anaheim and an NFL team to Phoenix. The same situation could happen with the Blues if Dave Checketts continues his quest to wreck sports teams across America. Both the Cardinals and Blues have been cursed with cheap owners, so as long as Cooper can support the club financially, he should be in good shape.

St. Louis may also be home to Anheuser-Busch and Monsanto, but the list of big companies in the area is rather slim. The club has to ensure these sponsors are on board to support the club and buy the luxury suites the new stadium will certainly have. With Budweiser’s established interest in soccer, the club could be well-positioned for success. Without that big money, the club could be doomed.

Those are two small problems that can be overcome by the right management, and it looks like St. Louis may have it.

WerderBremenYank
06 Sep 2007, 11:10 PM
The article raises some good points. We need to court companies like Anheiser Busch to assure financial stablility

Basque21
06 Sep 2007, 11:47 PM
Dave Checketts is the best thing to happen to the blues in years,
and St. Louis is home to 8 fortune 500 companies thats more than most cities.
The only thing he got right is Cooper is the right man for the job, and our soccer history.

P@rick_STL
07 Sep 2007, 07:24 AM
It is true that St. Louis can be considered a mid-size city, but it's important to understand which other American cities are also mid-sized (say, arbitrarily, 4M or fewer in metro-area population): Seattle, Minneapolis, Phoenix, and San Diego, among others.

It is true that St. Louis lost its NFL franchise to Phoenix, but it's important to remember that LA lost its NFL team to St. Louis. Team movement is rarely about viability in a market, and more typically due to an owner's whim.

It is not true that the list of large companies in St. Louis is slim. Over the past ten years, merger and acquisition activity has tended to concentrate corporate HQs in NY, CA, and TX, and to be sure St. Louis has lost a number of HQs in this trend, but there are only 5 or so cities with more Fortune 500 HQs. In some cases, losing an HQ via acquisition has strengthened the local company (e.g., Boeing, AG Edwards). The regional economy overall is diverse, large, and stable, with most growth coming from growing, mid-sized companies created in the past 10 years.

In short, there are only a small number of cities in the U.S. that would be more favorable than St. Louis, if population and regional economy were the only factors considered.

jfranz
07 Sep 2007, 10:40 AM
I don't understand how St. Louis is considered "Mid-sized." It's the 18th largest Metro in the United States, with close to 3 million people.

NY, LA and Chicago are "Uber" or "Mega" markets, and pervert people's perception of the size/influence of America's smaller (but still very, very large) markets. For me, any area with over, oh, I don't know, 2.5 million people is a "Major Market," which, currently, is about 20 Metro Areas. In a country 3,000 miles across with over 300 million people, 20 "major markets" seems a reasonable number for the category. Especially when you consider that on the entire European Continent (with over 700 million inhabitants!) there are, likewise, only about 20 Metro Areas over 2.5 million people.

Anyway, it's all semantic, I suppose. And I shouldn't worry about it. But I grew up in Salt Lake - and that is a Mid-sized market. St. Louis is substantially larger that Salt Lake (even larger, almost, than the entire population of Utah), so to call it a "Mid-sized" market seems inappropriate to me.

Basque21
07 Sep 2007, 12:28 PM
The writer of the article has no clue about St. Louis and seems very cocky, like he giving MLS permisson to grant us a team even though were in the miserable midwest:rolleyes:.
another thing, the Blues are not going anywhere, I love hockey and the Blues are getting so much support because of the new ownership group.

East Side Boy
07 Sep 2007, 12:43 PM
It seems as if all the pieces are falling in place....I can't wait for the vote on Monday!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!