Dune
16 Aug 2007, 07:26 AM
The Derby County manager Billy Davies said at the press conference last night that ” We can't compete with the resources of Manchester City, so we have to do our best with the money we have”. While this of course is true, another just as true view could have been something as this: “We can’t compete with a club like Manchester City, who’s youth system is far superior to ours. We just don’t get that many good young players coming through the ranks which means we’ll have to rely on transfers to get the kind of players we need. This is of course more costly and makes it hard to compete for a team with limited resources like us”.
My point is that with all this publicity and attention that City’s transfer moves and new players have got, people seems to forget that City so far has started both matches in the league with 4 academy players on the pitch (Schmeichel, Richards, Johnson, Ireland) and against West Ham United 5 were on the pitch at the same time when Onuoha was brought on. All of these with the exception of Schmeichel will most likely feature a lot throughout the season even when more new players is brought in. At to that young players like Daniel Sturridge, Shaleum Logan and a few others who the club holds in high esteem and may very well see first team action during the season.
The high number of home grown players is even more impressive when one takes in consideration that troughout the years City has been forced to sell the most talanted. Wright-Phillips at Chelsea, Barton at Newcastle United and Etuhu at Sunderland are all City acadamy graduates who now play for other Premiership clubs.
I do not think it is wrong to say that in the last years the acadamy has been one of the biggest reasons that City still is a premiership side. In what shape would the clubs finances be without the huge transfer received for Wright-Phillips? And would City have survived in the league last season without the contributions of Barton and Richards?
Sven-Göran Eriksson now has a totally different transfer budget then then what his predecessor(s) had. But I hope he will continue to give chances to those coming up through the academy ranks. I am convinced that is something the club will benefit from over the years to come.
My point is that with all this publicity and attention that City’s transfer moves and new players have got, people seems to forget that City so far has started both matches in the league with 4 academy players on the pitch (Schmeichel, Richards, Johnson, Ireland) and against West Ham United 5 were on the pitch at the same time when Onuoha was brought on. All of these with the exception of Schmeichel will most likely feature a lot throughout the season even when more new players is brought in. At to that young players like Daniel Sturridge, Shaleum Logan and a few others who the club holds in high esteem and may very well see first team action during the season.
The high number of home grown players is even more impressive when one takes in consideration that troughout the years City has been forced to sell the most talanted. Wright-Phillips at Chelsea, Barton at Newcastle United and Etuhu at Sunderland are all City acadamy graduates who now play for other Premiership clubs.
I do not think it is wrong to say that in the last years the acadamy has been one of the biggest reasons that City still is a premiership side. In what shape would the clubs finances be without the huge transfer received for Wright-Phillips? And would City have survived in the league last season without the contributions of Barton and Richards?
Sven-Göran Eriksson now has a totally different transfer budget then then what his predecessor(s) had. But I hope he will continue to give chances to those coming up through the academy ranks. I am convinced that is something the club will benefit from over the years to come.