Zidane or Riquelme?

[phil80]

I have no idea what the hell he is talking about. Not just here but on other boards as well. The newbie should stop posting and talk some time to read first.
In the other thread you listed Ballack as one of the 50 best, did you not? And left out Zidane

[Teso Dos Bichos]

Indeed I did but that was ages ago and discussed to death. It also has nothing to do with this thread and the comparison between Zidane and Riquelme.

[phil80]

Ages ago?? May 2007 is not ages ago, bud. Your post has everything to do with this one because now youre trying to say riquelme (in addition to ballak, henry -both baffling) is better than zidane

[Teso Dos Bichos]

It's longer than you have been a member. It's also from a previous discussion that was finished. I also stand by everything I posted. If you cannot comprehend it or contribute to this discussion then leave.

[phil80]

Again your reply brings nothing to the discussion. You claiming that Ballack should be included in the top 50 of all time and not Zidane, and now stating Riquelme is also superior, is nonsense. (I dont even think Germans themselves would rate Ballack over Zidane, itll be tough topping that statement)

[phil80]

It's longer than you have been a member. It's also from a previous discussion that was finished. I also stand by everything I posted. If you cannot comprehend it or contribute to this discussion then leave.
Is someone upset that their foolish statement (in Ballack better than Zidane) is brought up again? Learn to stick up for your claims, no matter how nonsensical they are.

[Teso Dos Bichos]

Again your reply brings nothing to the discussion. You claiming that Ballack should be included in the top 50 of all time and not Zidane, and now stating Riquelme is also superior, is nonsense. (I dont even think Germans themselves would rate Ballack over Zidane, itll be tough topping that statement)

Try reading that old thread to get my explanation. It is you who has dragged what I posed ages ago into this thread and offered zero explanation as to why you did so, why you disagree and why you believe what you do about the current topic.

Is someone upset that their foolish statement (in Ballack better than Zidane) is brought up again? Learn to stick up for your claims, no matter how nonsensical they are.

See above. :rolleyes:

[phil80]

Try reading that old thread to get my explanation. It is you who has dragged what I posed ages ago into this thread and offered zero explanation as to why you did so, why you disagree and why you believe what you do about the current topic.



See above. :rolleyes:
What explanation do you need? It's your wild claims that Ballack is superior to Zidane, and now your claiming Riquelme is as well. Once again, learn to stick up for your ridiculous claims no matter when you said them

[Teso Dos Bichos]

I did explain and defend my post previously but you have obviously been incapable of comprehending what was posted. Try reading instead of whining for a change. Also try to contribute to threads instead of simply trying to attack me. We are still waiting for you to discuss this thread topic!

[phil80]

I have already done so. Just because you have embarrassed yourself with that foolish ballack statement and now claiming riquelme is better as well, doesnt mean you can throw a hissy fit when one calls out your ridiculous claims.

[Moishe]

I have already done so. Just because you have embarrassed yourself with that foolish ballack statement and now claiming riquelme is better as well, doesnt mean you can throw a hissy fit when one calls out your ridiculous claims.

You both have your own opinions and neither of you agree with one another so just let it go and move on.

[phil80]

Teso's approach is to attack people, so he can avoid the actual discussion and salvage himself from sounding foolish, he is apparently failing at that miserably, and is therefore not to be taken seriously.

[Teso Dos Bichos]

That's a funny story you have posted there because it perfectly describes your behaviour thus far in this thread and countless others. All of your posts in this thread have something to do with me and none contribute to the actual discussion about Zidane and Riquelme. Grow up and contribute instead of simply going around BS and whining about me.

[phil80]

Pretty pathetic, teso, jumps from post to post and responds wherever i have posted. Nothing imaginitive to post i suspect. Once again, not to be taken seriously

[Teso Dos Bichos]

Do you have any reason for being on BS other than to troll?

[Koby7STAR]

i feel this is going no where

[phil80]

Do you have any reason for being on BS other than to troll?
Yeah, after you have made it your aim to attack me (and failed miserably at doing so), my reason is to expose the useless filth you continually post. Keep popping them out cuz you have nothing useful to contribute anyways

[Teso Dos Bichos]

Look at your first post in this thread and all of the subsequent others. I rest my case. Now would you like to discuss either Zidane or Riquleme at all?

[phil80]

Look at your post you specifically directed at me in the "top 50 players-statistics" thread. You have made it your aim to find the threads ive posted in to attack me, which is consistent with your childish behavior. I rest my case. And about the thread, riquelme's in his late twenties and has nowhere near the accomplishments zidane has. I have never heard by any expert on the game even mention riquelme's name when discussing the best players of all time, while zidanes name is constantly thrown in the mix.

[Teso Dos Bichos]

So you are willing to ignorantly only consider what achievements a player has (which is an awful way to compare players and has little to do with player quality) and what hacks have to say?