PDA

View Full Version : Euro 2008


Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 04:28 PM
OMFG did you not read the damn post i wasnt arguing against i was saying the same thing you are ex Deco....One more thing where were PIRES' parents from.

The Mighty Frog
29 Jul 2007, 04:31 PM
OMFG did you not read the damn post i wasnt arguing against i was saying the same thing you are ex Deco....One more thing where were PIRES' parents from.

OK.

Sagy
29 Jul 2007, 04:31 PM
Explain how my argument is wrong.That statement was incorrect but was made as i said to get reaction and continuing the discussion which i reffered to in my "tool" comment.
Your original post seems to have come out of the blue (after two days of no posting in this thread) and it doesn't look like there is any reference to you before that post. The post/claim I was responding to is:
I dont understan how a team like HOlland are ALWAYS FAVOURITES they have never won ANYTHING EVER EVER EVER.Spain Holland and Englnd should have their "Favourites" card revoked until they win something.
The argument that a team has to "win something" before they can be considered Favorites is wrong on it's face. Some examples of favorites that made it to the final game before they "won something":

Brazil 1950
Hungary 1954
England 1966
Argentina 1978
Holland 1978
France 1984
Holland 1988
Portugal 2004

If we use your definition that you need to have won something in the last ten years we can add:

Italy 2006
France 1998
Brazil 1994
That's 3 of the last 4 WC champions. All started the WC as one of the favorites, all won and none won the WC or the Euro in the previous 10 years.

It is clear that in your original post, both statements are factuality wrong

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 04:40 PM
LOL what did you go research for a few hours and comeback.AGAIN YOU DIDNOT READ EVRYTHING. WHAT I MEANT BY WIN SOMETHING IS BEATING MAJOR TEAMS IN MAJOR TOURNAMENTS OR QUALIFYING WITHIN 10 YEARS...OK NOW GO BACK TO YOUR WEBSITES DO SOME MORE RESEARCH AND COME BACK TO ME....IF YOUR EXAMPLE IS GOING TO BE PORTUGAL 96-06 ID SUGGEST LOOKING SOMEWHERE BECAUSE 02 WAS THE ONLY DISSAPOINTMENT.
LOL AND STOP TRYING TO SOUND SMART IM STATING OPINIONS NOT JUST COLD HARD FACTS THATS WHAT PEOPLE DO ON FORUMS.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 04:42 PM
What Argentina Did In 1978 Has Absolutly No Relevance To Todays Team....your Going Be A Teams History Which Has Nothing To Do With Today Team.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 04:44 PM
To finalize my point show me how England Holland and Spain have done in the ;last 10 years not 20 30 or 40. then tell me if im FACTUALY INCORRECT.Theres something called taking comments out of CONTEXT and thats what your doing.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 04:47 PM
Your original post seems to have come out of the blue (after two days of no posting in this thread) and it doesn't look like there is any reference to you before that post.



Since for some reason you felt compelled to point out the fact that i didt post for two days thats because i work and dont have the time to be on this site everyday.

Sagy
29 Jul 2007, 04:54 PM
LOL what did you go research for a few hours and comeback.AGAIN YOU DIDNOT READ EVRYTHING. WHAT I MEANT BY WIN SOMETHING IS BEATING MAJOR TEAMS IN MAJOR TOURNAMENTS OR QUALIFYING WITHIN 10 YEARS...OK NOW GO BACK TO YOUR WEBSITES DO SOME MORE RESEARCH AND COME BACK TO ME....IF YOUR EXAMPLE IS GOING TO BE PORTUGAL 96-06 ID SUGGEST LOOKING SOMEWHERE BECAUSE 02 WAS THE ONLY DISSAPOINTMENT.
LOL AND STOP TRYING TO SOUND SMART IM STATING OPINIONS NOT JUST COLD HARD FACTS THATS WHAT PEOPLE DO ON FORUMS.

And your opinions are still factually wrong.

BTW, based on the above post, I can see why people are saying that you are a troll.

Sagy
29 Jul 2007, 04:58 PM
Since for some reason you felt compelled to point out the fact that i didt post for two days thats because i work and dont have the time to be on this site everyday.

Re-read my post, I said that your original post (the one that is factually wrong) were posted after two days of no posting in this thread (I wasn't talking about the rest of your posts). Therefor, your claim that it was done in a response to someone calling you a "troll" is questionable.

frasermc
29 Jul 2007, 05:01 PM
i've seen nothing from this guy other than anger that the fact that poor little portugal don't get the respect they deserve...in his eyes.

but who am i to argue with a graduate of boston university.

you can tell it's true by the way he uses capital letters to project anger..

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 05:12 PM
NO the reason ive been responding the way i have is because theres always people talking down on my country so if nooone else is going to stand up then i will.and if you whant to doubt my intelligence try me the way i speak has nothing to do with my education i was raised in Newark NJ in the slums so excuse me if not a "proper civilized european"....Wow MacIKNOWNOTHING you stopped posting after my last post now your back to try n gang up on me with the other guy.Funny.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 05:20 PM
WOW your 44 yrs old and you cant read to well or your just choosing certain things i said and changing them around to fit the convo.....I POSTED THE FIRST TIME IN RESPONSE TO SOMEONE CLAIMING HOLLAND TO BE FAVOURITES AND PORTUGAL WAS NOT. SO YOUR EITHER DUMB OR CONIVING WHICH IS IT.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 05:22 PM
1 last thing before i go I WAS NOT "FACTUALLY INCORRECT" AS YOU PUT IT THE ONLY MISTAKE I MADE WAS NOT CALRIFYING WHAT I MEANT BY WINNING SOMETHING.

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 05:25 PM
btw so we dont get things confused i was being extremly SARCASTIC when i said "Civilized Europeans" and by the way this is just how i type the fact the you resort to that shows how much you really have to say go fry some fish n chips k Scotty McGinger

frasermc
29 Jul 2007, 05:25 PM
NO the reason ive been responding the way i have is because theres always people talking down on my country so if nooone else is going to stand up then i will.and if you whant to doubt my intelligence try me the way i speak has nothing to do with my education i was raised in Newark NJ in the slums so excuse me if not a "proper civilized european"....Wow MacIKNOWNOTHING you stopped posting after my last post now your back to try n gang up on me with the other guy.Funny.

if that were the case then why bring it onto here??

i havent seen any derogatory posts about portugal on the thread before you joined it. then you started ranting and haven't stopped since...

ever wonder if it may be possible that you bring it on yourself...?

pablo85
29 Jul 2007, 05:32 PM
Jealousy in europe is crazy you guys are mad that we have the most exciting players in europe PERIOD.Oh and if you knew anything youd know that we play 4-5-1 or 4-4-1-1 there our goals come and always have come from Wingers (didnt ronaldo score 19 goals in the EPL?)and attacking mids not having a striker didnt seem to be a problem when we knocke england2x spain holland2x in the last 2 tournaments and would have beaten france had Quaresma been on the team and moutinho there to replace Deco against france people seem to forget we didnt have our PLAYMAKER in that game.

I've seen you play against belgium and other qualifying matches, you say you have a new generation, I hope they come soon, because this generation is starving. All those old boys can't do shit anymore.
But we can talk talk talk but we'll see.
And Nani had to prove himself I saw him at EC under 21, he was nowhere. Man.Utd paid far too much for him, I hope for him and manchester that I am wrong.

Prawn Sandwich
29 Jul 2007, 05:34 PM
I've seen you play against belgium and other qualifying matches, you say you have a new generation, I hope they come soon, because this generation is starving. All those old boys can't do shit anymore.
But we can talk talk talk but we'll see.
And Nani had to prove himself I saw him at EC under 21, he was nowhere. Man.Utd paid far too much for him, I hope for him and manchester that I am wrong.
Nani has shown a rather different side to him on tour with United this summer. We'll see how he does in competitive games but from what I saw the potential is there

pablo85
29 Jul 2007, 05:45 PM
To finalize my point show me how England Holland and Spain have done in the ;last 10 years not 20 30 or 40. then tell me if im FACTUALY INCORRECT.Theres something called taking comments out of CONTEXT and thats what your doing.

oh you where very very much better portugal 1996-2006
NL 3 semi finals/1 quarter final/1 eight final
Por 1 final/2 semi finals/1 quarter final/1 first round

that is really really better

PSousaSCP
29 Jul 2007, 05:45 PM
I've seen you play against belgium and other qualifying matches, you say you have a new generation, I hope they come soon, because this generation is starving. All those old boys can't do shit anymore.
But we can talk talk talk but we'll see.
And Nani had to prove himself I saw him at EC under 21, he was nowhere. Man.Utd paid far too much for him, I hope for him and manchester that I am wrong.
This coming from the guy who said la liga was way better than the Prem....How many la liga teams in CHampions Semis?Im assuming your spanish by your name and your opinions and if you are than how you seem to forget that your team is barely in 2 place with scotland having a game in hand oh yeah i forgot about 3-2 northern ireland and 2-0 sweden but that never happend right.Since where on the topic of you claiming Nani was overpayed ? what about Fernando Torres soon to be the most expensive bust EVER in europe hes so overrated its not even funny he was even that good in spain the only reason the transfer was so high was because they where desperate and Benetiz is spanish he has never shown 30m form. But wait thats not all i seem to remember Benitez trying to get 2 or 3 of our "shit" generation players but failed HAHAHHA.

pablo85
29 Jul 2007, 05:46 PM
Nani has shown a rather different side to him on tour with United this summer. We'll see how he does in competitive games but from what I saw the potential is there

I hope it I've got nothing against Portugal people in common