View Full Version : Sam's Army, I mean, Squadran, in Virginia
NJPsycho
08 Jun 2003, 01:29 PM
Did they even go to the game? I can't tell from ESPN.
RoverMax
08 Jun 2003, 02:54 PM
It surely doesn't look like they did. If they did, I would think we would see their sign.
sch2383
08 Jun 2003, 04:51 PM
We were there. About 40 yards behind the goal New Zealand was defending in the second half.
HeadHunter
08 Jun 2003, 07:36 PM
Definitly there. We filled up section A write behind the goal that the US attacked in the 2nd half
cliffkram
08 Jun 2003, 07:46 PM
Yeah today you could actually hear the Army...dont know if that was ESPN's doing or the Army just singing louder, but still not a real variety of songs and chants....hey all you Armyfolk...check out the first page of this thread for some tips... http://www.bigsoccer.com/forum/showthread.php?s=&threadid=51588
The Magpie
08 Jun 2003, 08:02 PM
Sam's Army, USA Supporters and others were in a corner section behind one of the goals. Unfortunately, the ESPN camera angle seldom afforded a view of them. That being said I did get a glimpse out of them on TV, and I could certainly hear them, and the numbers looked good considering the nature of the match.
The Magpie
TangerineDream
08 Jun 2003, 09:13 PM
I was there in Richmond in the East Stand, and it amazes me that Sam's Kiddies get the notoriety they do.
Constantly addressing the New Zealand goalkeeper with a "You suck, a--hole!" on his goalkicks certainly was a way to do the US proud. Sam's Kiddies veered away from gamesmanship towards verbal abuse there. Ironic that the England fans in the game against Serbia-Monetnegro were probably better behaved than this group.
But why should people expect more from a group that uses jingoistic and trite slogans in promoting their existence? "Expeditionary Force". "Let's Roll".
For my money, the fans in the West Stands across the way were far more effective in supporting the game in a sporting manner.
The only creative, gamesmanlike (non-abusive) chant I heard was the "Stick to rugby!" chant.
TangerineDream
08 Jun 2003, 09:31 PM
I spent a year living in Scotland in the 1990s and witnessed all sorts of racist abuse hurled at players, have been caught in the middle of an Old Firm brawl at a pub, and have seen terrace stampedes.
Sam's Army could be so much more productive (and probably effective) if they would drop the personal attacks. But since it is probably about "them" as much as it is the NATS, I am skeptical that anything will ever change.
Even the "El Norte" banner was an underhanded jab at the Mexicans.
copaantl98
08 Jun 2003, 09:33 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I was there in Richmond in the East Stand, and it amazes me that Sam's Kiddies get the notoriety they do.
Constantly addressing the New Zealand goalkeeper with a "You suck, a--hole!" on his goalkicks certainly was a way to do the US proud. Sam's Kiddies veered away from gamesmanship towards verbal abuse there. Ironic that the England fans in the game against Serbia-Monetnegro were probably better behaved than this group.
But why should people expect more from a group that uses jingoistic and trite slogans in promoting their existence? "Expeditionary Force". "Let's Roll".
For my money, the fans in the West Stands across the way were far more effective in supporting the game in a sporting manner.
The only creative, gamesmanlike (non-abusive) chant I heard was the "Stick to rugby!" chant.
Please explain all the riots the England fans have caused compared to what Sam's Army has done. Please explain the racist chants that occur in Europe.
tame1999
08 Jun 2003, 09:36 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I spent a year living in Scotland in the 1990s and witnessed all sorts of racist abuse hurled at players, have been caught in the middle of an Old Firm brawl at a pub, and have seen terrace stampedes.
Sam's Army could be so much more productive (and probably effective) if they would drop the personal attacks. But since it is probably about "them" as much as it is the NATS, I am skeptical that anything will ever change.
Even the "El Norte" banner was an underhanded jab at the Mexicans.
you friggin moron, the LA NORTE banner is an DC United Supporters Group flag. get your fax straight before you go taken underhanded jabs(whatever that is) at people.
TangerineDream
08 Jun 2003, 09:38 PM
My fault.
But you prove my point with the name-calling. Why such hostility? Who wronged you in your life?
adam
08 Jun 2003, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I spent a year living in Scotland in the 1990s and witnessed all sorts of racist abuse hurled at players, have been caught in the middle of an Old Firm brawl at a pub, and have seen terrace stampedes.
Sam's Army could be so much more productive (and probably effective) if they would drop the personal attacks. But since it is probably about "them" as much as it is the NATS, I am skeptical that anything will ever change.
Even the "El Norte" banner was an underhanded jab at the Mexicans.
wow...
TangerineDream
08 Jun 2003, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by copaantl98
Please explain all the riots the England fans have caused compared to what Sam's Army has done. Please explain the racist chants that occur in Europe.
I was referring to the most recent England game.
I was not defending Europe in any way. Where do you get that?
TangerineDream
08 Jun 2003, 09:41 PM
Originally posted by adam
wow...
too cool . . .
adam
08 Jun 2003, 09:44 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
too cool . . .
Thanks. I do what I can.
cafrine
08 Jun 2003, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
My fault.
But you prove my point with the name-calling. Why such hostility? Who wronged you in your life?
Hmm, you're offended so far by the words "moron" and "asshole" and you believe Sam's Army to be harsh and abusive. Forgive us if we fail to take you seriously.
HeadHunter
08 Jun 2003, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I was there in Richmond in the East Stand, and it amazes me that Sam's Kiddies get the notoriety they do.
Constantly addressing the New Zealand goalkeeper with a "You suck, a--hole!" on his goalkicks certainly was a way to do the US proud. Sam's Kiddies veered away from gamesmanship towards verbal abuse there. Ironic that the England fans in the game against Serbia-Monetnegro were probably better behaved than this group.
But why should people expect more from a group that uses jingoistic and trite slogans in promoting their existence? "Expeditionary Force". "Let's Roll".
For my money, the fans in the West Stands across the way were far more effective in supporting the game in a sporting manner.
The only creative, gamesmanlike (non-abusive) chant I heard was the "Stick to rugby!" chant.
First off I would like to say that as someone who has been to a number of US matches that today was my first time sitting with Sams Army. It was without a doubt one of the most amazing experiences I have had at a soccer match. To actually address your points.
1) West Stands ???? Im not sure exactly what group you are refering to, but I saw no other group of supporters standing and chanting throughout the match.
2) All comments including those not suitably G rated for your tender ears are all in good fun. The interaction between the keeper and the Army was hillarious.
3) Personally I thought the "You wish you were Australian" was the best chant.
4) Someone back me up on this but doesn't El Norte refer to a DC fan group that sits in the north end of RFK? As many of the people in the section had come down from D.C. I would suggest that this is a more plausable explanation than your search for hidden insults.
5) Jingoistic? Offensive? Grow up. It was a fun experience that harmed noone and allowed us to display the pasionate support that can help elevate the Nats even in rather meaningless friendlies
copaantl98
08 Jun 2003, 09:55 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I was referring to the most recent England game.
I was not defending Europe in any way. Where do you get that?
This name calling stuff is for good fun and humor. I brought several soccer haters into sitting with such supporters and they loved it. Sam's Army makes the atmosphere ten times better.
dfb547490
08 Jun 2003, 10:05 PM
Originally posted by TangerineDream
I was there in Richmond in the East Stand, and it amazes me that Sam's Kiddies get the notoriety they do.
Most of us weren't "Sam's Kiddies", as you put it.
Constantly addressing the New Zealand goalkeeper with a "You suck, a--hole!" on his goalkicks certainly was a way to do the US proud.
Maybe they don't do it at Carolina Courage games, but it's SOP for men's games in this country. And the Kiwi keeper didn't seem to mind.
Sam's Kiddies veered away from gamesmanship towards verbal abuse there.
Again, most of us who were there today aren't part of Sam's Army.
Ironic that the England fans in the game against Serbia-Monetnegro were probably better behaved than this group.
It's a supporters section. If you're virgin ears can't handle it, get the ******** out (sorry, get the "fudge" out).
But why should people expect more from a group that uses jingoistic and trite slogans in promoting their existence? "Expeditionary Force". "Let's Roll".
Don't forget "Don't Tread On Me". Good thing you weren't at the Jamaica qualifier at Foxboro in 2001, we were singing "******** Bin Laden" for about a solid hour before kickoff. Your head might've exploded. And again, it's not Sam's Army you're talking about.
For my money, the fans in the West Stands across the way were far more effective in supporting the game in a sporting manner.
That must be why the entire US team and 2 New Zealand players (Ryan Nelsen and the keeper) acknowledge the West Stands after the match.
The only creative, gamesmanlike (non-abusive) chant I heard was the "Stick to rugby!" chant.
As the person who started that chant (ripped off the "stick to cricket" chant we do when we play Jamaica and Trinidad), let me cordially tell you to kindly ******** off.
I spent a year living in Scotland in the 1990s and witnessed all sorts of racist abuse hurled at players, have been caught in the middle of an Old Firm brawl at a pub, and have seen terrace stampedes.
You big hard man you.
Sam's Army could be so much more productive (and probably effective) if they would drop the personal attacks.
Get with the program. Sam's Army's influence among the hardcore US fan base is dwindling every day precisely because they DON'T generally do stuff like this.
But since it is probably about "them" as much as it is the NATS, I am skeptical that anything will ever change.
They're not small annoying bugs are they? Then don't call them the "Nats".
Even the "El Norte" banner was an underhanded jab at the Mexicans.
As Tomas mentioned, La Norte is the name of a DC United supporters group, who many of the guys who were there today belong to.
Good thing you weren't with me on the way out when I saw 2 guys wearing Mexico shirts and started yelling "Dos a cero!" at them repeatedly.
HeadHunter
08 Jun 2003, 10:12 PM
Hey dfb were you the guy wearing the BC hat?
On a different note can someone clear up the issue between USA supporters/Sams Army? I loved the atmosphere and was happy to add my 2 cents worth of help to it so I want to be connected with which ever or both of the groups that was most involved today. Especially the people who came up with the chants that our Orange loving "friend" so objects to