PDA

View Full Version : Opinions on breaking into the top four


Pages : [1] 2

United Pumps
13 May 2007, 09:15 AM
This will undoubtedly become a flame fest, as all topics do on this board, or end up being ignored.

How likely do people think it is that Tottenham, or any other club, could break into the top four in the next few years?

I can't forsee any other club than Tottenham having a chance. I'd say the second and third most likely would be Everton, who've done it before but don't really seem to have the quality to remain there and Newcastle, who have a good youngster or two, cash, some quality players and should soon have a quality manager.

Everton don't appear to have the cash necesary to break into the top four on a regular basis. Moyes has done brilliantly with what he has been given, with signings like Arteta and Johnson, and is utilising the youth that gets through to him. I think that they will maintain a position just outside of the big four in the next couple of years and will probably drift away from them in quality because of the lack of cash. They don't really have a weakness, they're just not strong enough overall.

Newcastle can't even break into the top 10 at the moment but that is probably because of the legacy of poor managers and an injury crisis. Considering Newcastle's current weaknesses (forwards/strikers and defenders) Big Sam, with his ability to make teams with very good defenses, should be perfect. If he uses Newcastle's money wisely and brings in a couple of quality defenders - preferably not Boumsong, that problem should go away pretty quickly. With Ameobi and Owen getting back to full fitness, Newcastle look to have a trio of quality strikers at their disposal. I can't really predict where they'll end up next year but if they spend wisely it should be in the UEFA Cup places. They still have a long way to go to be near the top four.

Moving on to Tottenham. As I stated earlier I believe, as well as most others, that if anybody is going to break into the big four it will be them. They have a brilliant manager, who is probably top of the list to succeed Mourinho if he got fired from Chelsea. They have cash. They have lots of young talent and a good squad. I don't think they'll sell Berbatov this summer as he doesn't want to go and they don't need the cash. Nobody is really willing to pay £30,000,000+ for him, which would probably end up being the asking price. Their strike force is immense. Berbatov and Keane make an awesome partnership and Defoe is quality as well. They have a strong midfield. I've been very impressed with Zokora, obviously Lennon is an awesome talent, Jenas can be very good and Malbranque is no slacker. They have a very good goalkeeper, despite the occasional slip up. They've been plagued by defensive problems this season but when you look at the players they have then you can see they aren't exactly weak in that department either: King, Dawson, Chimbonda and Lee. Saying that, this is probably the worst area of their squad and they've let in far too many goals this season (even counting the injury problems). They have had the fourth best attack and the fourteenth best defense.

Considering the money at their disposal and Jol knowing that they're weak at the back it looks likely that he'll act this summer and probably bring in some great young defenders (he wanted Bale but he seemed to want United).

Speaking an hour and a quarter before kick-off on the final day of the season it seems likely that they'll finish fifth. They have City to play, at home, whereas Everton, who're level on points with them, have to travel to Stamford Bridge. Upon hearing that they're fifth you'd naturally think that they aren't far from breaking into the top four but as we all know the points difference is huge and the significance is even greater. It is unusual that there is a gap of ten points anywhere in the table but because of Champions League money this is happening much more regularly.

Chelsea and United are obviously out of reach of Tottenham. Although they have a strong squad all around the step up in quality is obvious. Liverpool and Arsenal, however, are within reaching distance and Tottenham proved that last season as they were pipped to the post on the last day by Arsenal in quite freakish events. There is a growing chance, although it is still minute, that now Dein has left Arsenal will lose Wenger. This would be a phenomenal blow to them and would probably lead to them losing Henry and Cesc as well as the squandering of the squad's future. If Wenger left then I'd say it would be more than likely that Spurs would overtake them but I don't believe that he will leave. Liverpool appear to be level with Arsenal, yet this is more because of them fielding a pub team for their matches since reaching the CL final. Also, with the new owners and Champions League money Liverpool will probably end up vastly improving their squad, which would only take a quality winger and forward. I can't forsee Liverpool catching up with United and Chelsea but they'll most likely move away from Arsenal.

Considering all of this, Arsenal seems the only realistic target for Tottenham to overtake - which could make the North London feud even more interesting. With the exception of their ancient goalkeeper, Arsenal have a very young squad. Their other main sources of age are Henry, Llungberg, Gilberto and Gallas. Henry seems plagued with injuries although he is still possibly the best player in the world. Gallas has not had the effect that Wenger desired of him and will most likely leave in the summer following arguments with younger members of the Arsenal squad. Ljungberg doesn't necesarily hold down a starting place anymore although he is still an integral cog in the machine. Nearly all of the young players surrounding them are class, Cesc being amazing. Yet there are still some players who don't quite appear up to standard with the rest. It'll be interesting to see what happens with the Reyes/Baptista deal this summer as both want to stay where they are now.

The two squads match up like this:
Lehmann, Eboue, Toure, Gallas (likely to leave), Clichy, Fabregas, Gilberto, Rosicky, Hleb, Van Persie and Henry.
Robinson, Chimbonda, King, Dawson, Lee, Lennon, Zokora, Jenas, Malbranque, Berbatov and Keane.
On the bench Arsenal have more depth in quality but from the starting line-up you can see that Arsenal aren't miles ahead. Take out Gallas and possibly Henry through injury and you'll have a very even match up.

Arsenal aren't known for their big spending and Wenger isn't the type. There is apparently money available but Wenger hasn't found a use for it yet. Arsenal still aren't very well off because of their stadium move and are resisting a take-over. They are unlikely to improve their squad much and age won't be kind to Henry's style of play. The most likely improvement will come in the form of the squad recieving more experience and developing further. Tottenham have been known to splash the cash and it is obviously there to be splashed. Berbatov may play even better next season, King may not get injured and Lennon may improve as well. Jol will probably get a few players in as well.

My conclusion from all of this is that over the next season or two we shall be seeing Tottenham break into the big four or at least making it competitive once again. There are two outside factors that should be taken into account, both unlikely. If Wenger leaves Arsenal then they'll most likely plummet. If Jol succeeds Mourinho at Chelsea then Tottenham will drop back into mediocracy. However, neither really looks like it shall be happening anytime soon.

Also, hello.

leg_breaker
13 May 2007, 12:17 PM
No chance, teams just can't compete with the power of the Champions League, both in attracting players and paying them. This season the fifth place team was closer to tenth than fourth. The gap is getting bigger.

United Pumps
14 May 2007, 06:24 AM
This will undoubtedly become a flame fest, as all topics do on this board, or end up being ignored.
v_v

michael_91
14 May 2007, 08:10 AM
where did you hear the rumor that Jol was going to succeed Mourinho. I never thought Jol could do much except splash the cash, correct me if i am wrong.

United Pumps
14 May 2007, 08:16 AM
where did you hear the rumor that Jol was going to succeed Mourinho. I never thought Jol could do much except splash the cash, correct me if i am wrong.
Guardian during the New Year period. The Sun/other ************ tabloids everytime Tottenham do well in a match.

Ian Daglers
14 May 2007, 10:02 AM
Guardian during the New Year period. The Sun/other ************ tabloids everytime Tottenham do well in a match.

But all the papers are constantly speculating about Mourinho's replacement, and I think you hear a lot of other names more often: Guus Hiddink, Frank Rijkaard, Marcelo Lippi, even Mark Hughes (:p ). Is there something that makes the Jol story seem especially credible to you?

I realize this isn't what the thread is about, I'll try posting something on topic later.

United Pumps
14 May 2007, 10:26 AM
But all the papers are constantly speculating about Mourinho's replacement, and I think you hear a lot of other names more often: Guus Hiddink, Frank Rijkaard, Marcelo Lippi, even Mark Hughes (:p ). Is there something that makes the Jol story seem especially credible to you?

I realize this isn't what the thread is about, I'll try posting something on topic later.
I can't see Hiddink becoming manager of Russia and Chelsea as if he did crap at one and got fired he'd still be Roman's bitch in the other. I've never seen Rijkaard speculation but that does seem pretty likely to me. Lippi - maybe. Mark Hughes, I can't see it happening. I think after Arnesen moved from Spurs the connection with Jol was strengthened in my mind.

j.fisher
14 May 2007, 05:51 PM
It's easy to get into the top 4 of the Premiership... $$$.

United Pumps
14 May 2007, 05:52 PM
The problem with that is all of the big four have loads of cash as well.

act smiley
14 May 2007, 06:34 PM
I think one of the sides with the best potential is Newcastle if they get Big Sam. Despite Shepherd, they do have a big fanbase and can afford to pay reasonably, they have a good midfield and strikeforce and if anyone can get a defense playing well, its Allardyce. I think that next season they'll be back into the UEFA Cup, the season after, maybe they'll stand a chance of getting 4th, but its unlikely.
I think O'Neill is good enough to get Villa into the UEFA Cup, but I don't know about breaking the big 4 - he'd be given money, but lets face it the big 4 have even more.
Tottenham though, I doubt it. They're seriously overrated. Their defense is as leaky as Newcastle's, they have some talent but generally, I don't think they're much better than average at the moment and I don't see them being able to go much further than they are at the minute, perennial UEFA Cup entrants. Everton, even less likely. They had one good season, I don't think the depth, the talent or the cash is there to really do it again.

This is why the premiership is rubbish.

benni...
14 May 2007, 07:30 PM
I think if Newcastle can get a decent manager, they will be the most likely. They are a big club, and they have the funds. Im nto sure what their funds are compared to Spurs, but they've been wasting tons of money in the past couple of seasons.

If Big Sam [only saying that because I dont know how to spell his last name] got the job, there is a possibility of him taking them back up there. he did well with a limited budget at Bolton.

Spurs are the next in line for me, as they are building a nice squad to take them places. They are challenging for Europe and they have class players like Keane, Berbatove and Ledley King.

Pigs
15 May 2007, 03:04 PM
The idea of "breaking into the top four" is a myth.

Since the year 2000, these are the seasons that Arsenal, Man United, Liverpool and Chelsea all finished in the top four.

The seasons are in bold.

2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007


Leeds used to be the team up there, Newcastle used to be the team up there. Everton broke into the top four in 2005. While Tottenham were 4th all season in 2006 until the final day of the season.

Infact I'll go as far as saying, that I'm convinced next season. Arsenal, Man United, Chelsea, Liverpool will not ALL finish in the top four.


Remember when Man United couldn't stop winning titles? They won 8 titles in 11 years. And everyone said "Just who can stop Man United?"

Then Arsenal came about and won the title the following year. Winning it without losing one game. That season they were known as invincible. While Man United finished 3rd, their weakest season in 13 years. So in 2004, everyone was saying...."who can stop Arsenal?".

Then the following year, Chelsea won the title and they accumilated five more points than Arsenal the previous year. Only losing one game. They also won it the following season. The media always referred to Mourinho as the special one, and everyone witnessed the demise of Man Utd. Everyone said "Who can stop Chelsea?"

And then so the following year, everyone (apart from me) thought that the title race was between everyone but United. Even Liverpool with their amazing signings of Bellamy and Pennant :D where being considered title contenders, every redsh1te was so confident that they would top Chelsea. And so who won the title.......who was so dominant and won it in a stylish way and played the most exciting football? Manfookin United.

Nothing is set in stone in football, maybe Newcastle united trophies are since they won them in pre-historic times. But next season they could very well be challenging for the 3rd spot, let alone 4th. Tottenham are getting stronger every year, and if Moyes can add depth to the Everton squad than expect them not to be far away (our goal difference would be plus 23 had we not played Man Utd this season :D ) and we performed better than when we finished 4th in 2005. Although under Moyes our seasons are far from consistant, so i'm not getting too carried away.

Ian Daglers
15 May 2007, 03:57 PM
Ok, so the emergence of the big four is a relatively recent phenomenon. That doesn't make breaking in any less difficult. The fact remains that all four of Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Man United have qualified for Champions League four years running. That's intimidating. Yes, Everton finished fourth in 04/05, but they only took 61 points. It just happened that Liverpool sucked that year and only got 58 themselves. If Liverpool did that badly this year, they would have finished behind Everton again (and Spurs as well). But I don't think this is as much about waiting for one of the big four to suck as it is about asking if one of the other clubs can raise their game enough to put in a genuine CL-quality performance on their own. And I think if we look at the past examples, they seem to confirm what the OP claimed: that only the richest of the remaining clubs have a real chance (basically, Newcastle or maybe Spurs). If you look at the league table from anytime in the past decade, the only other clubs appearing in the top four are Newcastle (the league's fifth richest club) and Leeds (who also spent loads of cash).

However, I think certain things are changing that may allow some of the "semi-big" clubs to compete. Mainly the TV money. Yes, the rich clubs are getting even richer, but it's not like they can actually buy everyone. The relative wealth of the smaller clubs will increase, and the gap in quality between the big four and everyone else should decrease, as the lesser Premiership clubs are able to sign more and more high-quality foreign players. AND as a result of this increase in the quality of the average Premiership side, the days of the big four clubs expecting to average 80 points a season should also come to an end. This will tighten up the race for the top spots, even if the big four still have the most money. Expect the table to look less like Scotland and more like Spain in the future. Sure, it's going to be harder for the smaller clubs to win games too, but the gap to cross is going to shrink, which means there is at least the opportunity for a less talented or expensive squad to outplay their rivals for a CL place. If you need to get 3 or 4 more wins in a season than people expected from you, that's doable (as opposed to 7 or 8, which is really a different story). So I'm optimistic that the league will be more competitive in the near future.

punkman
21 May 2007, 10:22 AM
Arsenal is a very potential team, last year they are in the final of champions league. Even they didn't have funds to sign star players, they will always become one of the competitors, both on Premiership and Champions League. I don't think they will thrown away from the big four next season.

Derrida
21 May 2007, 05:30 PM
Since the year 2000, these are the seasons that Arsenal, Man United, Liverpool and Chelsea all finished in the top four.

The seasons are in bold.

2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007

This is true but somewhat misleading. Chelsea has only been *Chelsea* for a few years, so of course they won't show up in the top 4 with regularity before that.

As someone pointed out, the "big 4" have all qualified for the Champions League for 4 straight years, despite Everton barely making it in 2005.

As for the other years, in 2003, Newcastle managed 3rd but was miles away from the top two. In 2002, the top 3 were Arsenal, Liverpool, and Man U. Same thing for 2001 (and England only had 3 Champions League spots at this point). The lowest any of the "big 4" have finished in that whole time is sixth, and that was only Chelsea before the big spending days.

The answer seems to be "get a Russian quadrillionaire to bankroll you" or be resigned to occasionally challenging but mostly being shut out.

Finally, it may only be the four most recent years, but it is four consecutive years of data. There is strong reason to believe there is a significant change in the trends over that time. As a general rule, when you are predicting future events, you gather as much data as possible but heavily weight the most recent information. What happened five years ago matters, but certainly not as much as the last couple, especially when there are a lot of reasons to think the situation has changed significantly in ways that fit the new pattern.

punkman
22 May 2007, 09:15 PM
Tottenham and Newcastle can be problems next year. But I think the big four(Arsenal, Chelsea, Man Utd, Liverpool) will still dominating the league

ChinaDan
29 May 2007, 10:46 AM
Tottenham at the minute look like the only team in the league close to breaking into the Top4 sides, but I'd think Aston Villa and Portsmouth and maybe Newcastle now with big Sam in charge are all possible as well.

Villa and Portsmouth have now got the plenty of financial backing and Newcastle always seem to back their managers with the money, hasn't always worked in their favour but I think big sam can work his magic there like he did with an unfancied side like Bolton.

dm3mdgtr
29 May 2007, 02:12 PM
Arsenal is a very potential team, last year they are in the final of champions league. Even they didn't have funds to sign star players, they will always become one of the competitors, both on Premiership and Champions League. I don't think they will thrown away from the big four next season.




We've got the cash. We just never spend it on star players very often.

Barton8
30 May 2007, 02:12 AM
I have a feeling with a bit more consistency, Spurs may break into the big 4 next season.

I'm getting tired of the same top four every year. I hope a non-top four team suprises everyone and breaks into the top 4 next year. Preferably Pompey:D .

Ian Daglers
30 May 2007, 10:14 PM
Interesting article from today's Guardian about why some knowledgable experts also think the top four is going to become more penetrable:

New riches may lift Premiership also-rans to the fore
Premiership to cash in on overseas television deals
Gulf with Championship will widen, says report
(http://football.guardian.co.uk/News_Story/0,,2091781,00.html)

Some choice quotes:

"When you look forward a few years and ask yourself where the growth in the Premiership is going to come from, it's the overseas television rights. They are divided equally between the clubs and that will help level the playing field. I am not as doom-laden about this being the new order, with the top four there forever. Football, in all its guises, has a habit of surprising you."

...

"If there was an auction, it used to be possible for pretty much all the Champions League clubs across Europe to compete for them," Jones said. "But now there are five or six other clubs in the Premiership who have a very good chance of getting someone at what they would consider to be a reasonable price. As we know from the Deloitte European money league, Real Madrid, Barcelona, Milan and - now that they will be back in Serie A - Juventus will always be up there in terms of revenue. But the sixth- or seventh-placed Spanish and Italian teams fall off that scale. There is a big opportunity there for the Premiership clubs."