View Full Version : Do you want to see Bonds break the home run record?
Pages :
[
1]
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
flippin269
07 May 2007, 04:32 PM
http://www.click2houston.com/sports/13271928/detail.html
Didn't think much of the question until I saw this article. What do ya'll soccer fans think? Wanna see him break the American record, the world record, or none at all?
Matt in the Hat
07 May 2007, 04:41 PM
Which American record? He's not gonna pass Josh Gibson who hit over 800 and certainly not Sadaharu Oh who had 858.
I have no problem with him beating Aaron because A-Rod is gonna beat Bonds in 10 years.
flippin269
07 May 2007, 07:45 PM
Which American record? He's not gonna pass Josh Gibson who hit over 800 and certainly not Sadaharu Oh who had 858.
I have no problem with him beating Aaron because A-Rod is gonna beat Bonds in 10 years.
My bad. I mean Aaron's MLB record, or Oh's record.
hangthadj
08 May 2007, 09:09 AM
Go Barry, Go!
DoctorJones24
09 May 2007, 04:02 PM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
Matt in the Hat
09 May 2007, 11:09 PM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
I consider myself true baseball fan and I want it. Besides, I don't find 755 the granddaddy of baseball records. I have far more respect for 56, 2632, 4256 and 7.
Homers are overrated, IMO
flippin269
10 May 2007, 12:54 AM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
I'm a true baseball fan too, and I wanna at least see him break the MLB record, though I doubt that he'll ever get near the baseball record. People can't slam the dude for MLB not making steroids illegal and enforcing it like they are now. Hell, they didn't to McGuire, and he was a national hero when he passed Roger Maris's single-season record.
There's no asterisk to Bonds' career accomplishments.
655321
10 May 2007, 10:43 AM
It's gonna happen. Get used to it. He'll be in the hall of fame because he deserves it and he won't have any asterisks next to his name. He's part of a ********ed up league that is awash in all sorts of mis-doings and the idea that he's some great stain that's ruining an otherwise upstanding sport is just ridiculous and naive. The only difference between him and most players out there is that he's much, MUCH better than them (or was for most of his career).
655321
10 May 2007, 10:51 AM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
Yea, because professional baseball has been so clean and pure up until now.
hangthadj
10 May 2007, 05:25 PM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
Wow. Perhaps the silliest statement ever uttered on Big Soccer.
Congrats.
Walter3000
10 May 2007, 06:06 PM
The saddest thing about Bonds is that he was arguably the most talented all around player without cheating(him or Griffey), but it wasn't good enough for him.
I also think it's extremely naive to think all of baseball is dirty, all the all stars are, and it makes it somehow ok for barry.
He is a hall of famer, but do I want him to break one of the sports greatest records? Hell no.
In the end who cares, he'll be justifiably remembered more for the controversy and cheating then for how great he was. Could have been the greatest LF ever, and a minority probably think he is, but the majority will always consider him a cheat.
DoctorJones24
10 May 2007, 09:58 PM
Wow. Perhaps the silliest statement ever uttered on Big Soccer.
Congrats.
Thanks!
Now go defend OJ. And Pete Rose never bet on baseball.
blue32828
10 May 2007, 10:04 PM
Wow. Perhaps the silliest statement ever uttered on Big Soccer.
Congrats.
Go to the Politics Board. There's all kinds of stupid, silly crap written on there every minute.
DoctorJones24
10 May 2007, 10:12 PM
Go to the Politics Board. There's all kinds of stupid, silly crap written on there every minute.
He knows. He's just being really unclever in his put-downs.
Matt in the Hat
10 May 2007, 10:44 PM
He knows. He's just being really unclever in his put-downs.
Sorry, but who is the one that came out of the box being insulting?
christopher d
11 May 2007, 09:07 AM
No true baseball fan wants it. I get that some SF fans have blind spots--fine. But there's no doubt the record will be tainted until ARod/Pujols come along and clean it.
Hi! Real baseball fan here.
I'd like to see Bonds hit number 756. It's a record; it's made to be broken. Plus: you say "Steroids", and I say "Integration". And last I remember, no one asked to put an asterix by any of Ruth's records just 'cause he didn't have to hit Satchel Paige or pitch to Cool Papa Bell. Of course Bonds is a self-important jerk. So, was the stolen base record "tainted" during the decades that Ty Cobb held it? And Bonds may or may not have lied to the public. Too bad that Baseball took 500 hits away from Pete Rose so he'd never touch Hank Aaron or Ty Cobb. Oh, wait.
Baseball records are too important for this conversation. Pete Rose hit safely 4,256 times, and nothing in the world is going to change that. Likewise Barry Bonds. Someday he's going to retire with 775-800 home runs. And no one can challenge that, 'cause in some box of official scorer's sheets somewhere, one can find that many little pencil diamonds with the letters "HR" inside next to Bonds's name. And at the end of the day, that's all that matters.
riverplate
11 May 2007, 10:12 AM
Not to dump on the extraordinary talents of Satchel or Cool Papa, but they didn't face the likes of Stan Musial or Bob Feller, either. Nor did they play in a league that was interested in maintaining verifiable records. So many of their alleged accomplishments are the stuff of legend, not necessarily fact.
Anyway, I don't believe any of that pertains to the current pros and cons concerning people's feelings about Bonds' breaking the home run record. He'll have the record with no asterisk--the same as he has the single season mark with no asterisk.
And for what it's worth, I think Pete Rose belongs in the Hall of Fame for what he did on the field. I'm old enough to have remembered him during practically his entire playing career. I was watching on TV when he destroyed Ray Fosse at home plate during the All-Star Game. A really big deal at the time which is still talked about and came to personify Rose. He was a great player.
DoctorJones24
11 May 2007, 01:44 PM
And Bonds may or may not have lied to the public.
I forgot to add the caveat that you CAN be a true baseball fan and want Bonds to break the record IF you're completely clueless about the mountain of evidence against him.
The guy cheated. Hardcore. This isn't a Lance Armstrong "hearsay" case. They've got his freaking drug regimen on file, for chrissakes. They've got his injestion calendar, eye witnesses, it's a slam dunk. Not to mention his joke of a bodily transformation in the past decade.
Again. You can be a true baseball fan and just selectively choose to be silly/naive about Bonds' steriods use, I guess.
In any case, this is just message board banter. He IS going to break the record, after all, no matter what anyone "wants" or not. It's not going to ruin my day when he does, though I'll probably get annoyed at ESPN for covering it like it's some sort of remotely interesting event. Especially if they cut away from a real ball game I'm watching like they did last year.
Matt in the Hat
11 May 2007, 01:52 PM
I forgot to add the caveat that you CAN be a true baseball fan and want Bonds to break the record IF you're completely clueless about the mountain of evidence against him.
The guy cheated. Hardcore. This isn't a Lance Armstrong "hearsay" case. They've got his freaking drug regimen on file, for chrissakes. They've got his injestion calendar, eye witnesses, it's a slam dunk. Not to mention his joke of a bodily transformation in the past decade.
Again. You can be a true baseball fan and just selectively choose to be silly/naive about Bonds' steriods use, I guess.
In any case, this is just message board banter. He IS going to break the record, after all, no matter what anyone "wants" or not. It's not going to ruin my day when he does, though I'll probably get annoyed at ESPN for covering it like it's some sort of remotely interesting event. Especially if they cut away from a real ball game I'm watching like they did last year.
Bonds was juiced hitter going aginst juiced pitchers. That just seems even to me.
BocaFan
11 May 2007, 02:14 PM
Bonds was juiced hitter going aginst juiced pitchers. That just seems even to me.
umm.. it doesn't work like that. I think being a juiced hitter helps out a lot more than being a juiced pitcher or a juiced fielder. I could be wrong. I don't know enough about baseball to say for sure, but you simply can't make the blanket statement that you just did.
It's like saying steroids would help Ronaldinho's game as much as it would help a Ukrainian weightlifter.