View Full Version : Top 5 Players in EPL to you?!?!
Pages :
1
2
3
4
[
5]
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Joelzinho
20 Jan 2008, 05:13 PM
Cesc is much better than the first two...as for Essien maybe
Much better then Mascherano, yes....Scholes and Essien...debatable.
rochester rhinos
20 Jan 2008, 05:31 PM
Much better then Mascherano, yes....Scholes and Essien...debatable.We are talking about best right now? Because if were talking about right now I find it hard for someone to debate that Scholes is as good as Cesc.
Grinners89
20 Jan 2008, 06:57 PM
Much better then Mascherano, yes....Scholes and Essien...debatable.
Just because Masch isnt an attacking midfielder and therefore doesnt get the goals/assists, doesnt mean he is worse than Cesc...he hasnt had a bad game this season and he monstered Cesc when Liverpool played Arsenal.
We are talking about best right now? Because if were talking about right now I find it hard for someone to debate that Scholes is as good as Cesc.
I think youve all been influenced by the media's hype of Cesc. Yes he is good, but their are midfielders in the EPL and the world who are much better than him.
rochester rhinos
20 Jan 2008, 07:17 PM
Just because Masch isnt an attacking midfielder and therefore doesnt get the goals/assists, doesnt mean he is worse than Cesc...he hasnt had a bad game this season and he monstered Cesc when Liverpool played Arsenal.
I think youve all been influenced by the media's hype of Cesc. Yes he is good, but their are midfielders in the EPL and the world who are much better than him.Ok point taken but is he not better than 34 year old paul scholes?
Grinners89
20 Jan 2008, 07:19 PM
Ok point taken but is he not better than 34 year old paul scholes?
Its debatable right now because Scholes is injured, but last season, Scholes contributed more to Man Utd than what Cesc has contributed for Arsenal this season.
rochester rhinos
20 Jan 2008, 07:39 PM
Its debatable right now because Scholes is injured, but last season, Scholes contributed more to Man Utd than what Cesc has contributed for Arsenal this season.That is debatable.Last year Scholes scored 6 goals in 30 matches.Cesc scored 6 goals in 7 games this season.While Scholes role is more defensive this shows that just by the role he plays he contributes less to man utd than cesc does Arsenal.Also the season is only half over:rolleyes:
Joelzinho
20 Jan 2008, 08:54 PM
Just because Masch isnt an attacking midfielder and therefore doesnt get the goals/assists, doesnt mean he is worse than Cesc...he hasnt had a bad game this season and he monstered Cesc when Liverpool played Arsenal.
I think youve all been influenced by the media's hype of Cesc. Yes he is good, but their are midfielders in the EPL and the world who are much better than him.
Yeah, and Mascherano is not one of them.
Grinners89
20 Jan 2008, 11:59 PM
That is debatable.Last year Scholes scored 6 goals in 30 matches.Cesc scored 6 goals in 7 games this season.While Scholes role is more defensive this shows that just by the role he plays he contributes less to man utd than cesc does Arsenal.Also the season is only half over:rolleyes:
Again...its not all about the goals and stats...scholes didnt just kick 6 balls and scored 6 goals, he contributed to everything.
Yeah, and Mascherano is not one of them.
Why?
rochester rhinos
21 Jan 2008, 12:59 AM
Again...its not all about the goals and stats...scholes didnt just kick 6 balls and scored 6 goals, he contributed to everything.
Why? Cesc contributes more than Scholes does not including the goals if you wanna go that way.
rochester rhinos
21 Jan 2008, 01:00 AM
Again...its not all about the goals and stats...scholes didnt just kick 6 balls and scored 6 goals, he contributed to everything.
Why?While Scholes role is more defensive this shows that just by the role he plays he contributes less to Man Utd than Cesc does Arsenal.
Grinners89
21 Jan 2008, 06:04 AM
While Scholes role is more defensive this shows that just by the role he plays he contributes less to Man Utd than Cesc does Arsenal.
Firstly, why did you need bold...you think im blind?
And secondly, thats very ignorant of you if you think so. So does Mascherano or Makelele contribute less to the team because they perform superbly at their role? Try again...
rochester rhinos
21 Jan 2008, 02:18 PM
Firstly, why did you need bold...you think im blind?
And secondly, thats very ignorant of you if you think so. So does Mascherano or Makelele contribute less to the team because they perform superbly at their role? Try again...My point is that Cesc does defend as he is a CM but Scholes most of what he does is play behind Carrick.I mean everytime you watch Arsenal Cesc is playing a throughball near the box.
rochester rhinos
21 Jan 2008, 02:22 PM
Firstly, why did you need bold...you think im blind?
And secondly, thats very ignorant of you if you think so. So does Mascherano or Makelele contribute less to the team because they perform superbly at their role? Try again...Put it this way who contributes more to their team Gerrard and Lampard or Makalelee and Mascherano?
Grinners89
21 Jan 2008, 03:57 PM
Put it this way who contributes more to their team Gerrard and Lampard or Makalelee and Mascherano?
Depends on who plays better...if Masch plays better than Gerrard than he will contribute more
rochester rhinos
21 Jan 2008, 04:11 PM
Depends on who plays better...if Masch plays better than Gerrard than he will contribute moreOk what about over a whole season.Maybe if Masch was Patrick Viera or Essien I would agree with you but Masch and Scholes?
rpmrg11
21 Jan 2008, 05:07 PM
1. Cristiano Ronaldo
2. Theiry Henry
3. Steven Gerrard
4 Frank Lampard
5. Paul Scholes
Joelzinho
21 Jan 2008, 06:12 PM
1. Cristiano Ronaldo
2. Theiry Henry
3. Steven Gerrard
4 Frank Lampard
5. Paul Scholes
Ummmm......Henry doesn't practice his trade in the EPL any longer.
Grinners89
22 Jan 2008, 05:22 AM
1. Cristiano Ronaldo
2. Theiry Henry - LOL
3. Steven Gerrard
4 Frank Lampard - LOL
5. Paul Scholes
Btw...its 2007/08...not 2005/06
Teso Dos Bichos
24 Jan 2008, 10:45 AM
1. Ronaldo: EASY #1. He's #3 in the world right now as well.
2. Drogba: Say what you want, he's a beast.
3. Fabregas: Best midfielder in the Premier League.
4. Gerrard: Class.
5. Torres: Unbelievable.
1. He should have been #1 as a world.
2. A beast with a poor scoring record.
3. Laughable.
4. There are better.
5. I agree, it is unbelievable that you included him over other options.
The_ChelseaSupporter
24 Jan 2008, 06:24 PM
1. He should have been #1 as a world.
2. A beast with a poor scoring record.
3. Laughable.
4. There are better.
5. I agree, it is unbelievable that you included him over other options.
I agree with your comment on #1. Ronaldo is the best player in the world right now. Though I'll say that he does slack off a bit under pressure.
Drogba has a poor scoring record? That's news to me.
Fabregas is good but does not merit a #3 spot.
Who I better than Gerrard at this spot in the EPL? Rooney? :rolleyes:
Torres is awesome. As much as I hate him and Liverpool, this Spaniard is a natural.