PDA

View Full Version : Essential "Historical Literacy" Films


Pages : [1] 2

DoctorJones24
01 Aug 2002, 10:38 PM
I just caught "All the President's Men" on tv, and was thinking what a valuable film that is for helping educate the younger generation on American history. As every available measurement tells (not to mention personal experience) the youth today is the least informed, least engaged generation in the history of the republic. Now a huge part of this, IMO, is that we are living through a shift from written to visual literacy; quite simply, few young people read much anymore. However, I'm not interested in bemoaning this, since nothing can change it. So given the reality that images are what "work" in getting messages to today's youth, what 5 films would you say are "essential" to helping kids understand their place in our culture, world, history, etc.?

Here's five off the top of my head. All fall under the "history lessons at the movies" cateory:

1) All the President's Men
First, it's probably one rare pre-90s film that will keep students' attention, as it is pretty fast paced and riveting at times.

2) Schindler's List
Even with its flaws, still the most important Holocaust feature film made to date.

3) Separate But Equal
Fairly paint-by-numbers account of the famous Brown v. Board of Ed. case, and it's overlong, but it is held together Sidney Poiteir as a young Thurgood Marshall.

4) Missing
A major aspect of US history rarely mentioned in history books: our criminal political/military involvement in Central America over the last half of the 20th century. This film touches on the case of Chile.

5) Matewan
John Sayles' movie dealing with a coal miner's strike in West Virginia.

For documentaries, I'd choose:
Manufacturing Consent
The Battle of Algiers

Alberto
01 Aug 2002, 10:52 PM
I would add:

McCabe & Mrs. Miller: captures what it must have been like to live in the real west.

Black Robe: captures what it was like to live in 17th century French territory in the New World.

Saturday Night Fever: Quintessential 1970's pop culture in Queens, NY.

The Grapes of Wrath: Growing up in the depression area dustbowl.

more later....

Ghost
01 Aug 2002, 11:44 PM
There's actually a book related to this called Past Imperfect, which contains essays by historians about historical depictions in the cinema. Each one took one film and examined it for its historical content. Eric Foner wrote on Matewan with much praise, which is to be expected, i suppose. I think Sayles inherently thinks more like an historian than like a dramatist, and his cinematic language is best considered in this light. THis film is better history than it is cinema.

ON the other hand ...

And, in anticpating the upcoming laudatory essay from Gringo Tex, last of the Mohicans gets sliced up, based on historical content. Basically, the criticism is that the Iroqouis practices, rituals and everything else are out of place are out of time. He compared its accuracy to the statement: "It is like having George Washington throw out the first ball for the 1843 Washington Senator' season opener." Each thing existed,, but not at the same time. But it's historical liberties don't make it a bad film.

spejic
01 Aug 2002, 11:49 PM
A little known film I would like to recommend is "The Wind and the Lion" starring Sean Connery as a sheik who kidnapps an Amercian woman in 1904, and gets president Teddy Roosevelt involved. Based on real events, and and interesting view of how outsiders see the US.

Smiley321
02 Aug 2002, 02:49 AM
Let's not forget Ben Hur, great fiction from the days of ancient Rome

The Longest Day and The Battle of the Bulge are good WW2 movies. Judgement at Nuremberg, too.

Doctor, if you liked the "All the President's Men" movie, read the book, also. That was a memorable book, it gives all sorts of trivia about Nixon's shenenigans not in the movie.

Lastly, "The Spy Who Came in From the Cold" is a great cold war spy story without the James Bond gimmicks.

bungadiri
02 Aug 2002, 12:58 PM
I'll toss this one in for now because Gringo Tex mentioned it on another thread and I've been thinking about it.

Age of Innocence is a great film about the kind of political power that used to exist in the so-called "domestic" domain, that was dominated by women, prior to the extensive changes wrought by the industrial revolution. (An interesting history book about this, but focusing on the domestic economy of the early New England colonies/states is "Good Wives" by Laurel Ulrich (I think)). Wharton, is one of at least 3 women writers, along with Jane Austen, and George Eliot who would have made great cultural anthropologists.

krolpolski
02 Aug 2002, 01:55 PM
Originally posted by DoctorJones24


2) Schindler's List
Even with its flaws, still the most important Holocaust feature film made to date.



You're going with American history flicks, and then you added this one, which has a peripheral relation to American history. So here I would suggest, instead of the flawed Shindler's List, to go with a film by Andrzej Wajda (one of Spielberg's heros) called Korczak.

It's about Dr. Korczak who ran an orphanage for Jewish children in Warsaw and he does everything in his power to keep these children safe and alive in the hell the Nazis created in Warsaw. Despite an offer by the Polish underground army to smuggle him out of the Warsaw Ghetto when the Germans begin their roundups, Korczak stays with the children until the bitter end.

As far as other films about WWII:

* Tora, Tora, Tora - A much better film about what happened at Pearl Harbor than Pearl Harbor.

* A Bridge Too Far - Shows how British arrogance cost a lot of lives for nothing.

* Battle of Britain - A great film about the decisive campaign in the western theater of the war.

Other history:

* The Killing Fields - A wonderful example of the consequences of American foreign policy gone bad.

evilcrossbar
02 Aug 2002, 06:52 PM
As a history grad student, the most accurate (and best) historically-based movie made that I've seen is "The Return of Martin Guerre". Its about as close as you'll get to understanding what life was like in an early 16th century village in southern France. And the movie is actually very good too (French production with subtitles).

The screenplay and the book were both written by historian Natalie Zemon Davis and is based on a true court case in the early 1500s love, marriage, deceit, lies, and death.


WARNING, do not mistake it for 'Sommersby', the Hollywood remake monstrosity starring Ricahrd Gere and Jodi Foster taking place during the Civil War. Not only is this full of lousy acting (no ***************, its got Richard Gere) but its about as historically 'accurate' as that piece of crap: 'Bravehart'.

Doctor Stamen
02 Aug 2002, 06:56 PM
U-571 :D :D.

nicodemus
02 Aug 2002, 06:58 PM
If you want to know all the history in the world, you just need to watch every episode of Blackadder and you will learn all you need about the middle ages, world war II, and everything else you might want to know to be historically literate.

Doctor Stamen
02 Aug 2002, 07:07 PM
I second that.

GringoTex
02 Aug 2002, 07:10 PM
Documentaries:

"Land Without Bread"(1951) - Bunuel's short film about homeless children in Mexico.

"Salesman" (1967) - Albert Maysle's look at door-to-door bible salesmen.

"The Sorrow and the Pity" (1973) - Ophuls' exploration of French collaboration with the Nazis.

"Letter From Waco" (1995) - Don Howard's piece on football, death and religion in Texas.

"Close-Up" - Kiarostami's analysis of a regular guy who goes on trial in the Iranian justice system for impersonating a famous filmmaker.

Oh yeah, and Ken Burns sucks.

nicodemus
02 Aug 2002, 07:16 PM
Koyaanisqatsi

GringoTex
02 Aug 2002, 07:17 PM
Originally posted by Doctor Stamen
U-571 :D :D.

So Mathew McConnaughey cant do a British accent- what's the big deal?

Doctor Stamen
02 Aug 2002, 07:24 PM
Wrong people (i.e. Americans), wrong story (wasn't as action packed), even the wrong sub (it was U-110). It's amusing in the sense that it is so inaccurate.

GringoTex
02 Aug 2002, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by Doctor Stamen
Wrong people (i.e. Americans), wrong story (wasn't as action packed), even the wrong sub (it was U-110). It's amusing in the sense that it is so inaccurate.

details, details - I think you're being a tad too picky.

nicodemus
02 Aug 2002, 07:29 PM
You could show Black Hawk Down. I think it would be a good example of what happens when technology encounters determination.

Doctor Stamen
02 Aug 2002, 07:31 PM
Hmmmm, I daresay a British victory at Midway would cause a bit of a stir, as would a film portraying Thomas Jefferson as a guy with a fondness for sexually abusing slaves. Never mind, as long as people don't take these films as gospel truth.

It wasn't a bad action film, altough I hear Das Boot is better (haven't seen that one).

evilcrossbar
02 Aug 2002, 07:59 PM
Originally posted by Doctor Stamen
It wasn't a bad action film, altough I hear Das Boot is better (haven't seen that one).

Das Boot is the best submarine movie (and one of the best German movies) ever made. Its a bit long however - after the third hour of the depth charging I got somewhat fatugued. But it still tops at portraying what life was like abord submarines prior to nuclear power.

pething101
02 Aug 2002, 08:44 PM
I guess this is not the thread to bring up Mel Brooks' History of the World Part I. :)

How about Gettysburg, Gallipoli and even though it has some historical errors, Amistad.