MLS Club Logos Question

[usbfc]

What teams currently have the same crest today that they used in the inaugural season, '96 (or '98)? And, if anyone has some of the earlier ones, I would love to see some of them again.

Here's my guess.

Chicago Fire
LA Galaxy
KC Wizards
Columbus Crew
NE Revolution

Is this correct?

[KdaleB]

I know KC is different -- in 1996 they were just the Wiz (no ards).

[CFCsupporter99]

Here is a link to a website that has all the MLS logos past and present. Enjoy

http://www.sportslogos.net/index.php

[Marquez]

^
|
|
|
That's actually a pretty cool site all around, not just MLS. :)

[Stan Collins]

According to that site, Rev, Fire, Crew have never changed. The Gals changed the color of their lettering.

[kebzach]

^
|
|
|
That's actually a pretty cool site all around, not just MLS. :)

I agree.

[Soccerglue]

I think the Revs should change their logo. I was thinking it should look something like this http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/park/yfh45/brisrvlo.gif

[CFCsupporter99]

New England Rev current logo screams for an update.

[Cashcleaner]

^
|
|
|
That's actually a pretty cool site all around, not just MLS. :)

I've got to agree with you big on that one. Used to use the forums there quite a bit back in the day.

[KingJames]

I think the Revs should change their logo. I was thinking it should look something like this http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/park/yfh45/brisrvlo.gif

that's cool, i always liked their logo though

[peabrainedidiot]

that's cool, i always liked their logo though

just needs something to frame it. It's a cool logo with a cheap presentation.

[Parrish]

Perhaps it's too obvious, but I'd also mention ...

Real Salt Lake
Chivas USA
Toronto FC

... and possibly Hoston, depending on your view of the franchise as a continuation of the Earthquakes, or as a later interpretation of 1836.