View Full Version : Questions.
mrslam
30 Aug 2006, 01:04 AM
Im a relatively new Chivas fan. Im not too sure how the bussiness stuff works around here. Is sabah property of chivas? If chivas choses to take him back after the season, can they do so?
Also, What was the bottom line with the whole Bravo thing.
Is he still going to leave once his contract is up, in two years? Cause if so, I suggest Chivas sells him to a Spain team after this year is up.
Various Styles
30 Aug 2006, 06:47 AM
Is sabah property of chivas? If chivas choses to take him back after the season, can they do so?
I believe Sabah is playing on loan, because there was never any news on a transfer to Cruz Azul. Therefore, Chivas can indeed get Sabah back.
Also, What was the bottom line with the whole Bravo thing.
Bravo was frustrated because Chivas didnt accept any of the offers the low bottom La Liga clubs madce for him. Most of these offers were for a loan deal and offered Chivas very little loan fee, making the deal quite ridiculous. No club should give away one of their top players for free.
Bravo then started acting gay and bashed the Chivas directives in an interview calling them liars ect, showing that he didnt have the best interest of the club in mind, even if he threw in that bit about wanting a league title with Chivas. Bravo cant realistically expect Chivas, who have invested so much money in him to let another club take him for peanuts.
If Bravo leaves after his contract is up remains to be seen. Not sure how much this incident damaged the player/directive relations. We should have a better idea by the end of the season.
I suggest Chivas sells him to a Spain team after this year is up.
IMO, Bravo is not La Liga material. He is a good player in the MFL but Internationaly he hasnt proven to be as good as he is with Chivas. He misses to many sitters and I dont think he would fair well in a more physical league.
mrslam
30 Aug 2006, 11:22 AM
I believe Sabah is playing on loan, because there was never any news on a transfer to Cruz Azul. Therefore, Chivas can indeed get Sabah back.
Bravo was frustrated because Chivas didnt accept any of the offers the low bottom La Liga clubs madce for him. Most of these offers were for a loan deal and offered Chivas very little loan fee, making the deal quite ridiculous. No club should give away one of their top players for free.
Bravo then started acting gay and bashed the Chivas directives in an interview calling them liars ect, showing that he didnt have the best interest of the club in mind, even if he threw in that bit about wanting a league title with Chivas. Bravo cant realistically expect Chivas, who have invested so much money in him to let another club take him for peanuts.
If Bravo leaves after his contract is up remains to be seen. Not sure how much this incident damaged the player/directive relations. We should have a better idea by the end of the season.
IMO, Bravo is not La Liga material. He is a good player in the MFL but Internationaly he hasnt proven to be as good as he is with Chivas. He misses to many sitters and I dont think he would fair well in a more physical league.
Thanks dude.. you awnsered them all..
UNION_1906
30 Aug 2006, 12:40 PM
Bravo then started acting gay
lol. dude that was funny, didnt see it coming. But hopefully his gayness has resided and he can return to doing what he does best, whatever that may be... i guess angerig the fans maybe? or at least confussing the ******** out of em.
mrslam
01 Sep 2006, 12:59 PM
Another Question..
How come Chepo dosent start Bravo and Medina at the same time??
I personally prefer Medina over Santana any time. How come that never goes down?
Differ
01 Sep 2006, 02:57 PM
Another Question..
How come Chepo dosent start Bravo and Medina at the same time??
I personally prefer Medina over Santana any time. How come that never goes down?
It has happened, but usually late in games, the do play well together don't get me wrong.
Santana hustled and earned a starting spot, lately however, he's been rather timid when finishing so that might earn him a spot on the bench again seeing as how Venado Medina was doing real well during Bravo's suspension.
Problem with having both on the field is you pretty much rule out any form of "air game". Bravo might be able to finish some headers if left alone, but fighting for a cross has never been his forte. Especially if playing against some taller defenders which, in comparison to Bravo, are in the majority.
Banner or Hulk?
01 Sep 2006, 03:45 PM
Im a relatively new Chivas fan. Im not too sure how the bussiness stuff works around here. Is sabah property of chivas? If chivas choses to take him back after the season, can they do so?
Sabah didnt do squat in his time with the Chivas. Dont be misled by his four goals in five games, there is a reason why he was loaned out. Id take Bravo, Medina, Borboa, and Santana over him any day.
UNION_1906
01 Sep 2006, 07:44 PM
what sabah did bring though was an urgency to play and to prove himself and etc. unlike bofo who sometimes ni se le ve que le heche ganas... but bofo obviously beats him out in technical aspects. y pues querer y poder son dos cosas differentes. im happy that things are working out with him in cruz azul, because he wasnt getting anywhere here with us.