PDA

View Full Version : "Within a mile of home..."


Pages : [1] 2

The Magpie
18 Aug 2006, 09:02 PM
It’s difficult to put a finger on just where the New England Revolution season got off track, but to that end, some might question whether the Revolution's season has ever actually gotten on track.

Concerns began to surface when the Revolution (again) gave away their home advantage in the CONCACAF Champions Cup earlier this year, when Clint Dempsey departed for World Cup duty, while any number of key players rotated in and out of the body n’ fender shop. Factor in the impact of an ever-dwindling fan base, with the club’s average home attendance the worst in team history, and at present, also the worst in the League, the Revolution find themselves an average club left wanting for answers.

Let’s put a fine point on it, the New England Revolution are a little better than a .500 team that’s showing a bigger hand that it really has, and as the season goes on, opponents are finding it easier to call the Revolution’s bluff. The players are frustrated, the supporters are frustrated, and the coaching staff seems frustrated, yet the front office continues to operate with what might might be described as benign ambivalence, operating in a fashion that appears neither progressive nor committed, beholden to an operational philosophy that runs the club lean, chosing to "nickel and dime" from a busienss standpoint, rather than taking necessary steps (i.e., spending $$$) to finally turn the bridesmaid into a bride.

Pundits like ESPN the Magazine’s Jeff Bradley seem removed from such concerns, subscribing to the opinion that the Revs will turn it on late... that they'll make the playoffs, and perhaps go on from there, but seasoned supporters in new England would beg to differ, fidning themselves both angst-ridden and frustrated, undcerstanding that the team, in and of itself, isn't bad, but isn't performing up to their potential and/or ability.

This begs the question, just what the ******** is wrong in New England?

For one thing, the Revolution have failed to address a key personnel concern stretching back to last season: the lack of an effective flank midfielder on the left side of the field. While Steve Nicol auditioned both Cassio (Brazil) and Ricardo Phillips (Panama) for the position last season, neither player seemed capable of filling the need at that position, with Cassio only looking comfortable in reserve matches playing with countryman Marcos Romanerio, while Phillips just looked overmatched from a physical standpoint. Granted, perhaps Nicol felt that he had adequate cover at that position going into the off-season, with both Khano Smith and Marshall Leonard having performed adequately (or better) wide left in 2005, but with Leonard's blown achilles, and Smith's slow recovery from a serious knee injury, the Revolution have had to make due with placeholders on the wing, the situation exasperated by Pat Noonan's injury concern's.

In addition, the Revolution have yet to address the issue of an aging Steve Ralston wide right, who, while still an effective player, no longer has the wheels to beat defenders and gain separation.

In short, the Revolution are woefully weak on the wings, and when understanding this, it should come as no surprise that the Revolution offense has struggled this season. Taylor Twellman, as mercurial a forward as they come in MLS, has certainly suffered from the situation, carrying the burden of the attack in the absence of any number of attacking players, and while seemingly beholden to the frustration that stems from this, is also concerned with the immediate future post-2006 season, perhaps looking for a move abroad (MLS is rumored to have passed on a $1.2 million offer from VfB Stuttgart for Twellman) when considering the frustration he's experienced (at least as suggested in press reports) in working with the Revolution to secure a new, more lucrative contract with MLS.

Considering the above, one might ask "why don't the Revolution endeavour to make additions that would resolve this concern," especially considering that New England has both the cap and roster space to sign a player of some note. Well, Nicol has prove himself a good coach when it comes to molding a team, he is neither inclined, nor particularly adept at evaluating existing talent. While other MLS clubs can seemingly track and sign prospects at will, the Revolution take to the evaluation of foreign talent like a 3rd grader to homework, and one suspects that Nicol would sooner endure a series of Tetanus shots than beat the bushes to find an established player who might contribute a considerable, positive impact to the club.

Remember, this is a coach who championed Steve Howey, who at last check, was trying to catch on with any number of lower division clubs in the English League while also dealing with a DUI charge in the U.K.

So what do you do to improve a team when:

* The head coach seems incapable or uninterested in identifying existing talent...

* The front office operates with a modus operandi that puts the bottm line, rather than the finish line first...

* The players themselves aren't focused on the present, find themselves frustrated, or are otherwise distracted by issues not related to play on the pitch?

Here are my recommendations to shake things up relative to the current situation:

1. Trade Taylor Twellman: If the rumors are true, Twellman's begging for a better MLS contract is more an effor to protect the player than seeking additional $$$: Taylor plans to jump ship this off-season for Europe no matter the sound-bytes offered to the press, and the Revolution (considering their business model and their needs going into next season) would be wise to dangle him as trade-bait before the end of the season, but in such a way as to get fair-value for him. Trade Twellman to a club that could legitimately accommodate him from a cap standpoint with a significant raise from the League, but in the Western Conference, should he actually stay with the club. If not, trade him to a club like Kansas City: they're first in line for an allocation, need help in attack, and might be willing to part ways with a useful attacking player like Dave Van Den Bergh. If Twellman stays with KC, he'd have a good strike partner in Johnson, while the Revs get first dibs at an allocation, and a versatile player in the Dutch import.

Granted, this is about as likely as Paris Hilton agreeing to give up her American Express Black Card.

2. Send a number of promsing young players on loan for the off-season including Jeff Larentowicz, Andy Dorman, and Michael Parkhurst. Let them get some exposure to another professional environment, and let them get some matche play, especially considering how we're currently between World Cup cycles.

3. Be aggressive in the transfer market: look for good players who’d be up for a switch, could subscribe to Nicol’s philosophy, all while understanding that this is isn't a retirement league or a cake-walk. Also, don’t look to south or Central America (no matter the contacts the club might have there, or the pressure club officials may impart to explore these regions.) The club doesn’t need something interesting out of the bargain bin, they need to spend some money and get something off the regular rack.

4.. The club needs to define the role of Sunil Gulati, which might mean eliminating his involvement with the club in any official capacity. As President of U.S. Soccer, it presents a conflict of interest for him being involved with any particular MLS club anyway, and as it stands, the Revolution is need of some strong, progressive, and transparent leadership in the front office. Sunil might otherwise be able to provide this (if the Kraft's let him), but his priority has to be U.S. Soccer, and holding onto him as some ill-defined consultant or officer won't help the Revolution. Let him do his new job, hire someone who can assume his position within the Revolution organization, while providing a clear, transparent description of what his responsibilities are. Likewise, give him free reign to make changes; don't let the bottom-line dictate the club's operational philosophy, at least from a competitive standpoint.

5. Don’t interfere with Nicol and Mariner’s coaching philosophy, and if anything, encourage it. That being said, understand that a team’s success is only realized when the players believe in themselves, the system, and the club they play for. When any player begins to break from either of these, it’s a situation that need be addressed immediately. I.e., the club needs to address issues as they arise, and not simply put off acting until it suits the front office; breakdowns in internal communication can only affect the club and its players negatively.

6. Let the honor of team captain owe more to leadership than loyalty.

7. Dump Daniel Hernandez: he's one of the highest paid players on the team, is unlikely to beat out Andy Dorman for his old position, and has been more of a burden than a boon for the club considering his fitness/injury issues.

The fact of the matter is this: the Revolution aren't a bad club, but they're closer to that than being a great club, and much of the reason lies with the players' inability to overcome their frustration and inconsistency, as well as the club's lack of a progressive attitude when it comes to being competitive, both on and off the pitch.

The Revolution don’t need a dressing down… they don’t need to hang their heads in frustration at the end of the match, they don’t need to put the last match behind them… they need to find the answer within themselves, because help’s not coming, and the only way the club is going to break free of their slump is to free themselves… free themselves from self-doubt, self-centeredness, self-pity, and they need to offer up a giant middle finger to the status quo and every comfort it may provide...

... the Revolution should no longer be content with being the bridesmaid. They need to elbow the other single women in the ribs, grab that damn bouquet, drink champagne from the bottle, dance with the hottest man in the room, flirt with the groom, take over the turntable, and cut some killer moves on the dance floor, because if they don't, theyn they'll just be another miserqable party guest who's just happy to be there.

The Magpie

Minutemanii
18 Aug 2006, 09:45 PM
Boy, you sure do have a lot of time to invent this glass half empty stuff.

Do me a favor: Shaaddduuup!

The Revs will be fine.

Just go away. Go away.

Edited - No need to quote the entire post....

Shaneo
18 Aug 2006, 09:48 PM
thanx magpie, i agree except for the part about TnT, if he must go than i would like to see a true striker rather than another attacking midfielder i mean we already have argueably 3 of those in the starting lineup (Dorman, Demps, Noonan) and although noonan does play in the striker role for the revs, if Tnt does go than we would have no true strikers on the team, However if he must go here are some of the replacements I would like to see: Chris Rolfe, Chad Barrett, kenny cooper, Jovan Kirovski, jason garey

Chowda
18 Aug 2006, 09:49 PM
Boy, you sure do have a lot of time to invent this glass half empty stuff.

Do me a favor: Shaaddduuup!

The Revs will be fine.

Just go away. Go away.
Intelligent, well thought out response.

Echo Bravo good buddy.

Autogolazo
18 Aug 2006, 10:05 PM
Why is it Ricardo Phillips looked "overmatched from a physical standpoint" but continues to score goals for Panama at the international level?

Hmmmmm.

What needs to be added to that long ramble is Nicol's inability to utilize the Latin player.

Or perhaps mistrust is the correct word.

If he doesn't get "stuck in", then he can't possibly do your team any good is the thinking.

I'm no fan of DC, but they are absolutely setting the mold with their Argentine bonanza--and now have Donnet coming in, as well. That's how it's done--bring guys in to create an atmosphere of inter-relation.

As far as player acquisition is concerned, Nicol has proven himself to be both focused and narrow-minded, two sides of the same coin. He's generally good at identifying draft talent, generally bad at getting the Revs the foreign players they need.

Sachin
18 Aug 2006, 10:06 PM
Nice Flogging Molly reference.

patfan1
18 Aug 2006, 10:25 PM
Boy, you sure do have a lot of time to invent this glass half empty stuff.

Do me a favor: Shaaddduuup!

The Revs will be fine.

Just go away. Go away.
That's good ... for all the good points Magpie made, that's your only response? Wow.

Magpie, some scary stuff in there ... a lot of it that I've been worried about since the season started. This team, IMHO, is most likely paddling in the deep end, desperately trying to find footing. They're running out of time to do so.

szazzy
18 Aug 2006, 11:18 PM
van den Bergh probably isn't much faster than Ralston is right now (they play on opposite wings however), but his game won't suffer as much as Steve's has, as he's gets older. He doesn't rely on speed to create space and give quality service.

I'd take Twellman here in KC, but the two of those players together would make a great combo. Twellman makes better runs than most players, and VDB hits possibly the best cross in the league. EJ doesn't seem as instinctive at seeing that run early.

Dan B
18 Aug 2006, 11:28 PM
Well written. While I have to disagree on a few points, I think you make a compelling argument.

I think you make a number of great points that show that the problem with the team is with the Ownership and Management. But then you turn around, and recommend that the players be shopped to change things around.

I believe that when a soccer player is wanted in a higher league, and that league offers a greater challenge (and salary), then the lower league should sell the rights to that player. This is natural (and right) in the soccer world. If this is the reason to get rid of players, then I am all for it. If the reason is that Management has alienated these players (by action or inaction), and now they can no longer play with this team at this level, then you have made a great case for removing the management. I think this is the case.

Unfortunately, the levels of management that have shown that they are unworthy seems to go from the top to the bottom.

It's because of this that I am no longer the fan that I used to be. I am still a great fan of the players, but I am no longer a fan of the team if that team includes the management and the ownership.

I also feel that the entertainment value of the team has gone way down, and I'm not alone. With their abysmal attendance numbers, many fans have shown that the product is not worth their entertainment $ either.

It indeed may all come together at the end of the year for the Revs. They may put together a win streak, and compete for some silverware at season's end, but the damage has already been done to this listless organization.

Dan Loney
19 Aug 2006, 04:07 AM
That's good ... for all the good points Magpie made, that's your only response? Wow.Yeah, but at least he quoted Magpie's whole post, so we'd read it twice.

CLEATS
19 Aug 2006, 07:26 AM
Talk about overanalyzing.You know what they say about opinions.

KevTheGooner
19 Aug 2006, 09:10 AM
Thanks Magpie, for saying what's been on everyone's mind. That some major investment is necessary for this team to salvage the season and, perhaps, even salvage the franchise.

The Magpie
19 Aug 2006, 09:29 AM
Talk about overanalyzing.You know what they say about opinions.

Everyone has one, like an asshole, right? ;)

Look, forgive me if I don't walk around with blinders on, or if I chose to examine what I and some others believe are critical issues, but there are some serious concerns that the Revolution have to face, and sooner rather than later. Like it or not, the Revolution "have issues."

That doesn't necessarily mean I see the glass as half-empty. Believe me, there's a lot that's right with this club, from the coaching pair of Nicol and Mariner, to the brand of soccer the team plays when they're mentally focused, healthy, and self-motivated.

However, the Revolution are their own worst enemy at this point, and only time will tell whether they do turn it on as Jeff Bradley's suggested.

I just have reservations about that.

Also, here's a bit of context for those wearing the rose-colored glasses:

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2006/writers/grant_wahl/08/18/dempsey.beasley/

The Magpie

Minutemanii
19 Aug 2006, 09:57 AM
That's good ... for all the good points Magpie made, that's your only response? Wow.

Magpie, some scary stuff in there ... a lot of it that I've been worried about since the season started. This team, IMHO, is most likely paddling in the deep end, desperately trying to find footing. They're running out of time to do so.


It was more of a reaction, Monty. I just got sick of the negativity. One could write something similar about any team. That was my point. The initial stance in that piece was to be negative. Every team has flaws. I just believe the Revs will be ok. They are in the playoff hunt. I believe they will be just fine with some home cooking. I just don't have 30 minutes to list why I feel that way.

My only frustration is that they keep suspending Demps. I haven't gotten to see him play live since the spring.

doublerunner
19 Aug 2006, 01:02 PM
Just because someone writes a piece explaining their opinion does not mean they know what they are talking about. I've listened to a lot of people who just ramble on and on and on as though they have to talk constantly to make it sound as though they know what they are talking about. Just because a team is losing does not mean you have to shake everything up. The owners and the coaches have proven themselves to be successful. Fans in New England become easily bored. We have great coaches and some very good players. The injuries have taken a serious bite out of their game. So while going out and breaking the bank to bring a name player may attract some fans...probably for the short term...it may not be the best answer. How many people heard of Twellman or Dempsey or Reis or Shalri, etc before they came to New England to play. Yes they are struggling compared to how we know they can play. It happens. And the finicky fans in New England are not going to games. New England fans just want to win. No matter how it happens. True fans will stay with their team. While I do agree some moves need to be made I think we just need some patience as injured players come back and we start to gel again.

miked9
19 Aug 2006, 02:53 PM
Great post, Magpie. Repped.

The point is, we've won SIX games all season. Six out of twenty two. S-i-x. The Galaxy twice, Chivas once, Dallas once, Red Bull once, and Chicago once. Exactly two of those teams have a record over .500.

For comparison, in 2005 we won 6 out of our first 7 matches.

The Revs just aren't performing this year, and things aren't looking good on the horizon. Dempsey's definitely on his way out, Twellman might be, and Ralston is fading fast. Noonan hasn't scored in almost a year. Shalrie hasn't looked like the best DM in the league all year, either. Yes, we've had injuries. Yes, we've had suspensions. But we've also done nothing to improve since last year. At some point, results matter. And this team isn't getting it done, and aren't looking like they're GOING to get it done.

Six wins isn't enough. That's the bottom line. We need to demand better from our organization, because we all know the potential is so much more. I'm not convinced that the entire organization (particularly the front office) is committed to winning, and that's frustrating as hell.

the stranger
19 Aug 2006, 03:21 PM
Nice post. The only point I have more than a mild disagreement with is number 7. I am not a huge Hernandez fan, but having him in the game moves Dorman to the wing. This effect cannot be underestimated IMO. Whatever his personal preference may be, Dorman is mediocre in the center, but one of the league's better players on the outside. Given the team's weakness there, I am baffled that Dorman is not outside every time.

(Actually I suppose it is not THAT surprising, considering Nicol MUST have Franchino on the field somewhere. That is my major complaint right there)

Dan B
19 Aug 2006, 04:09 PM
... Every team has flaws. I just believe the Revs will be ok. They are in the playoff hunt. I believe they will be just fine with some home cooking. ...Sure ... and we in New England know flaws. Just think back to what the Krafts paraded in front of us for the first few years.

But we came to the games back then. We knew we had a crap team, but every now and then they played above their abilities, and it was great to watch.

This team is a very good team, with very good players. With a little tweaking and improving this was going to be another great year, not one where we had to limp towards the playoffs. But someone decided to stand pat in a league that keeps improving. We knew it, and the players knew it too.

So we now have a team that is playing far below it's capabilities. Nobody wants to pay to watch that, except maybe our opponents.

Baysider
19 Aug 2006, 06:30 PM
It’s difficult to put a finger on just where the New England Revolution season got off track, but to that end, some might question whether the Revolution's season has ever actually gotten on track.

...





Nice post.


The question I have about Twellman is would he be willing to sign for MLS "max" (300K)? If he isn't, then no team will trade for him. If he is, then wouldn't NE want to keep him? If I were running the Galaxy, I would love to have a Twellman and I could certainly clear 300k in cap room for him.

Matrim55
19 Aug 2006, 07:37 PM
I question the sanity of anyone who'd call the Krafts a "successful" ownership group. I was attending UConn when the league was founded and for the first few years I went to about a half-dozen Revs games per season. Back then the whole lower bowl of Foxboro was filled with what were, at the time, the best fans in the league.

It took a lot to kill that team, but the Krafts did it by nickel-and-diming them to death. Just as they're doing to the Patriots now, by the way.

I think the obvious point from this article is that the Revs are doomed for as long as Kraft holds onto them. There's no academy, no SSS, no international scouting, and once Dempsey and Twellman leave, not many wins in your future. It's a shame because in 1996 no place in the league rocked like Foxboro.