View Full Version : Transfer Thread #4 2006
Dead Fingers
21 Jun 2006, 01:12 PM
#4...already?!?!?!?!?!
:D
BMike86
21 Jun 2006, 01:26 PM
Im with you Bmike we should just let someone else deal with Cruz. After this season if that focker just as so much gets a headache we should sell him. I mean common its been how long 3/4 years? (stats guy correct me if wrong)
He's been with us since 1999 but has been injured just about every year!!! An even more interesting stat would be how many times he was injured each year?? He is talented but he's been injured several times a year its like he needs to drink more milk or somethin:p
Duncan Idaho
21 Jun 2006, 02:04 PM
Lahm can go if price is right - Beckenbauer
Hamburg - Bayern Munich left-back Philipp Lahm can leave if the price is right, club president Franz Beckenbauer was quoted as saying on Wednesday amid reported interest from English champions Chelsea. "It depends on the price. You normally must keep such a player but you have to sit down and discuss it if the transfer sum is huge," Beckenbauer told the Sport Bild weekly. Lahm, 22, is one of Germany's leading players at the World Cup. He has a contract in Munich until 2009, but Chelsea are reportedly ready to dish out at least €15-million (about R133-million) for him. The Premier League giants have already snapped up his former Munich team-mate and Germany captain Michael Ballack on a free transfer and reportedly dished out €48-million to get Ukraine star Andriy Shevchenko from AC Milan. "Not even Milan were able to keep a star like Shevchenko because (Chelsea's Russian owner) Roman Abramovich paid so much," said Beckenbauer. - Sapa-dpa
Funny, that the Sportbild invention gets so much attention! :rolleyes:
btw: Franz hasn't to do anything with transfers ;)
ForeverRed
21 Jun 2006, 02:14 PM
Yea I was wondering why Franz would even consider that, it would be absolutley insane to sell the best performer at the WC so far.
Oh yea, I still say the Ruud move won't go through.
bayern_man
21 Jun 2006, 02:46 PM
If Bayern bought RVN and sold anyone else but Makaay it would be a big mistake. RVN and Makaay are just too similar,i know you guys have fond memories of Makaay,as do i,and he is a really great person,but if RVN and Makaay were on the field at the same time it would be a disaster. They are both goal poachers who don't really work much for the team and often have dips in form,it just wouldnt work. You can say what you like about Santa Cruz being injured a lot,but what about Deisler? he has been injured a lot nobody would even think about selling him,Scholl was injured a lot and everybody loves him,just give Santa Cruz a chance,he has been unlucky to be injured a lot
AllReD
21 Jun 2006, 03:32 PM
Dip in form my arse, Makaay has been with us for 3 season and only surffered 1 dip in form and he still bagged the most goals on the team. (stats guy can we have the figure).
As Bmike pointed out SC has been with us for 7years now, i have thongs that are older and more reliable than that. (im wearing one now :D )
As for Deisler we gave SC 7years we can atleast give him 4 cus after this year his arse should be fitter than Mr.T if he wants to stay.
makkay
21 Jun 2006, 05:18 PM
please stop with the makaay thing. i would take makaay over RvN any day of the week.
1. RvN is selfish and the king is definitaly not
2. RvN bitches too much the king never
3. RvN never scores from outside the area and the king does
4. this season is the only season in the past four that RvN has scored more goals than the king(4 less) ( you can check that if you want) and we all know the cause for the king not scoring as many as he normaly does.
5 the king is a much nicer person and he plays for bayern and that alone makes him better.
please would you let go of the makaay thing it is getting annoying.
as for Lahm, that was one stupid comment from the kaiser. Lahm is not for sale. none of our players is for sale. what the fock are we gonna do with the money. we have enough to buy the players we want it is just that not a lot of good players want to come to munich. i will be pissed if Lahm left.
BMike86
21 Jun 2006, 05:40 PM
please stop with the makaay thing. i would take makaay over RvN any day of the week.
1. RvN is selfish and the king is definitaly not
2. RvN bitches too much the king never
3. RvN never scores from outside the area and the king does
4. this season is the only season in the past four that RvN has scored more goals than the king(4 less) ( you can check that if you want) and we all know the cause for the king not scoring as many as he normaly does.
5 the king is a much nicer person and he plays for bayern and that alone makes him better.
please would you let go of the makaay thing it is getting annoying.
as for Lahm, that was one stupid comment from the kaiser. Lahm is not for sale. none of our players is for sale. what the fock are we gonna do with the money. we have enough to buy the players we want it is just that not a lot of good players want to come to munich. i will be pissed if Lahm left.
i can now rest happily knowing that you are on Makaay's side. Otherwise i don't know where you go from here especially with your username :p I wish we could bring in Simao he had a pretty good showing today against Mexico. I finally had a chance to watch one of his matches and I agree w/Duncan in that we should go after him. If we go after Simao it should be same price as Ruud if not less!
makkay
21 Jun 2006, 05:45 PM
i can now rest happily knowing that you are on Makaay's side. Otherwise i don't know where you go from here especially with your username :p I wish we could bring in Simao he had a pretty good showing today against Mexico. I finally had a chance to watch one of his matches and I agree w/Duncan in that we should go after him. If we go after Simao it should be same price as Ruud if not less!
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i'm a bayern fan first. i only like makaay because he plays for us and that is the only reason.
as for simao he is a good option. even if he is more expensive tha Ruud. he is someone we need. and we don't need Ruud but if Ruud were to come to munich i would just like him because he plays for bayern.
Duncan Idaho
21 Jun 2006, 05:49 PM
please stop with the makaay thing. i would take makaay over RvN any day of the week.
1. RvN is selfish and the king is definitaly not
2. RvN bitches too much the king never
3. RvN never scores from outside the area and the king does
4. this season is the only season in the past four that RvN has scored more goals than the king(4 less) ( you can check that if you want) and we all know the cause for the king not scoring as many as he normaly does.
5 the king is a much nicer person and he plays for bayern and that alone makes him better.
please would you let go of the makaay thing it is getting annoying.
the only thing you are afraid of is a new nick :p
DemmahoM
21 Jun 2006, 06:05 PM
please stop with the makaay thing. i would take makaay over RvN any day of the week.
1. RvN is selfish and the king is definitaly not
2. RvN bitches too much the king never
3. RvN never scores from outside the area and the king does
4. this season is the only season in the past four that RvN has scored more goals than the king(4 less) ( you can check that if you want) and we all know the cause for the king not scoring as many as he normaly does.
5 the king is a much nicer person and he plays for bayern and that alone makes him better.
6.RVN performes well during the big matches, the "king" never does.
I'm sorry but I had to put that, I think the main reason why the Bayern management is even considering RvN is because he's a proven striker, that CAN score goals in the big matches.
Makaay though I love him never EVER does this.
Juventus
Chelsea
Arsenal
AC Milan
It's frustrating.
Don't get me wrong, for 2 seasons Makaay had the goal scoring burden. But You have to admit..he never scores when it's needed the most.
ForeverRed
21 Jun 2006, 09:11 PM
hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
i'm a bayern fan first. i only like makaay because he plays for us and that is the only reason.
as for simao he is a good option. even if he is more expensive tha Ruud. he is someone we need. and we don't need Ruud but if Ruud were to come to munich i would just like him because he plays for bayern.
Where would be play Simao anyways? He's a winger, not a forward/striker.
Plus, management would never go after him, neither would Benfica sell him, at least not to us.
Dr.Phil
21 Jun 2006, 11:36 PM
Selling Lahm would be stupid he is 22-23 and becoming the best LB
BayernWake
21 Jun 2006, 11:57 PM
I don't know what the Kaiser is thinking. Right now, Philip Lahm is priceless.
baka_tenshi
22 Jun 2006, 12:26 AM
I don't know what the Kaiser is thinking. Right now, Philip Lahm is priceless.
May be he try to emphasize IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT to scare off (THE FOCKING) suitor.
Well, move on to the good news,
http://home.skysports.com/list.asp?hlid=396943&CPID=22&clid=156&lid=9&title=Bayern+look+to+Bojinov
Hmm all the roumour lately is about striker. Wondering if Magath is finally thinking to employ 3 striker upfront. Damn, then he should consider Kerlon.
baka_tenshi
23 Jun 2006, 02:04 AM
Hah I just read this article
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com/06/en/060608/1/77m3.html
He said, Rensing is quite good to play as left back.
BayernWake
23 Jun 2006, 10:15 AM
Interesting, I didn't know Schweini had a brother in the 3rd division.
Dr.Phil
24 Jun 2006, 07:14 PM
http://soccernet.espn.go.com/news/story?id=372378&cc=5901
Ruud is going to return to Man U preseason training
balla
25 Jun 2006, 03:09 AM
What about Maxi Rodriguez from Atletico Madrid?Playing wonderfully for Argentina scoring brilliant goals....I think we could get him from Atletico Madrid.
Memento
25 Jun 2006, 05:20 AM
I think Maxi Rodriguez is very inconsistent.
But ,oh well, two or three good games in a WC can make the people think you are the next Johann Cruyff these days.