View Full Version : Best Starting Line Up
farenhorst is very weak metzelder is a bench warmer, neuville now? you prefered podolski in the other forum, you lack stand and you depend on romours to judge players IMO
Could you please not bring your differencies from another forum to this board please.
Camilo
03 Apr 2006, 02:49 PM
................................... ......Kahn
............................Metzeld er......Mertesacker
Friedrich.......................... ................................... ......Lahm
................................Fri ngs...........Kehl
................................... ....Ballack
Neuville........................... ................................... ....Schweni
................................... .....Klose
Nodoby like this one ???....i think if perfect......strong MD and a strong Offensive....the defence with the comun problems.....bu those 4 are the best we have
arthur d
03 Apr 2006, 02:53 PM
Could you please not bring your differencies from another forum to this board please.
Who are these romours though that can help you judge things? That was one of his more interesting posts.
Bayerntone
03 Apr 2006, 03:51 PM
Damn this fixture has "danger' written all over it.
Seriously, why DO countries play friendlies against countries like these. Confidence boosters? :confused:
When you look at the match in isolation, it doesn't make much sense.
But if you see them in a whole set:
27.05.2006 Deutschland - Luxemburg, Freiburg
30.05.2006 Deutschland - Japan, Leverkusen ARD
02.06.2006 Deutschland - Kolumbien, Mönchengladbach ZDF
There is a clear message written all over the schedule.
poorvi
03 Apr 2006, 03:58 PM
metzelder! a substitute! mertesacker who is too tall and very week, then this forum is full of kids
Huth is also a substitute at Chelsea. Metzelder ges more playing time in a month than Huth. Thats a fact. Mertesacker is tall, and slow. I don't know why you are calling him weak? Lanky yes, but weak? :confused:
There is no need to call me a kid. I refrain from calling you a fool, even when your posts make it quite obvious that you are one.
Bayerntone
03 Apr 2006, 04:02 PM
Ha ha, VH is way tooooo old! :p
Mehr
03 Apr 2006, 06:35 PM
farenhorst is very weak metzelder is a bench warmer, neuville now? you prefered podolski in the other forum, you lack stand and you depend on romours to judge players IMO
You make zero sense. In the other forum, you stated that Fahrenhorst should play right back!!!
Btw, I decided Neuville should play as I think he and Klose have a better understanding than Podolski. No to mention Neuville was pure class against the U.S.
Ulf Kirsten19
03 Apr 2006, 10:09 PM
-------------Lehmann
---------------Kehl
--------Friedrich---Metzelder
--Lahm--------Borowski--------Jansen
----------Schweini-------Ballack
-----------Klose-------Kiessling
Kiessling is obviously not under consideation of Klinsi. I think his patner may possibly be Poldi or Asamoah in WC 2006. Kuranyi, Neuville, Hanke, Lauth, and Odonkor all have similar abilities but different strengths.
3-5-2 allows us to play with our best available players. players like Poldi, Frings, MErtesacker as our main backup. Frings can be our RWB or CM if Lahm or Borowski cant play. and Poldi can either play as CF or AM .........
Ulf Kirsten19
03 Apr 2006, 10:20 PM
1.enke
2.lahm -should be switched from left to right
3.jansen
4.huth
5.brnzeka
6.kehl
7. freir
8.ballack
9.pig(scweini)
10.klose
11. neuville/lauth
Nice to see u here computerthug..........i m coldplay
Psychosis hsv
04 Apr 2006, 10:47 AM
Nice to see u here computerthug..........i m coldplay
thank you, lets keep matters at hand here
cheers Chris Martin
Psychosis hsv
04 Apr 2006, 10:50 AM
You make zero sense. In the other forum, you stated that Fahrenhorst should play right back!!!
Btw, I decided Neuville should play as I think he and Klose have a better understanding than Podolski. No to mention Neuville was pure class against the U.S.
JUST LIKE THE OTHER FORUM YOU HAVE STARTED IT AGAIN. PLEASE DON'T REPLY TO MY POSTS. I WON'T REPLY TO YOUR POSTS EITHER
DEAL?
Psychosis hsv
04 Apr 2006, 10:58 AM
-------------Lehmann
---------------Kehl
--------Friedrich---Metzelder
--Lahm--------Borowski--------Jansen
----------Schweini-------Ballack
-----------Klose-------Kiessling
Kiessling is obviously not under consideation of Klinsi. I think his patner may possibly be Poldi or Asamoah in WC 2006. Kuranyi, Neuville, Hanke, Lauth, and Odonkor all have similar abilities but different strengths.
3-5-2 allows us to play with our best available players. players like Poldi, Frings, MErtesacker as our main backup. Frings can be our RWB or CM if Lahm or Borowski cant play. and Poldi can either play as CF or AM .........
INTERESTING LINE-UP
KIESSLING! HAVE DOUBTS. METZELDER IS NOT CONVINCING, FRIEDRICH IS GOOD BUT LACKS PACE, THE OTHERS ARE OK, BUT I WOULD HAVE PREFFERED PODOLSKI IN THE LEFT HAND SIDE OF MIDFIELD.
DEFENSE IS THE MAIN THING HERE
Psychosis hsv
05 Apr 2006, 12:00 PM
Who are these romours though that can help you judge things? That was one of his more interesting posts.
all posts here are romours, ie when one say lehmann is good you second that if you have never even watched him play